Recently introduced legislation would establish a national standard for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS)...
Recently introduced legislation would establish a national standard for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Under the PFAS Action Act of 2021, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) would be required to take several regulatory actions regarding PFAS, which are often called “forever chemicals” because they take so long to break down.
Growing Concerns Over PFAS
In the past, PFAS were frequently used in a wide-range of products, including non-stick cookware, firefighting foam, and food packaging. However, studies have found that the chemicals are linked to a number of health conditions, including cancer and low birth weight.
While many U.S. manufacturers have stopped using PFAS in favor of safer alternatives, prior discharges have resulted in very high levels of PFAS in many public and private water systems. According to EWG, more than 320 military sites across the U.S. have PFAS contamination, and more than 200 million Americans may be drinking contaminated water.
While states like New Jersey have been proactive in setting limits for PFAS, the EPA has not yet taken official action. On February 14, 2019, the EPA released its much-anticipated action plan for addressing PFAS. While the EPA’s PFAS Action Plan outlines both short-term and long-term initiatives, final regulations have yet to be introduced, and the federal government has been criticized for dragging its feet.
PFAS Action Act of 2021
The PFAS Action Act was introduced in U.S. House of Representatives on April 13, 2021 with bipartisan support. The legislation has also been endorsed by several consumer and environmental advocacy groups, including Environmental Working Group, Union of Concerned Scientists, Consumer Reports, Green Science Policy Institute, League of Conservation Voters, Environmental Law & Policy Center, National Wildlife Federation, Natural Resources Defense Council, Food & Water Watch, Safer Chemicals, Healthy Families, and Southern Environmental Law Center.
Among other provisions, the PFAS Action Act would:
Require the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to establish a national drinking water standard for PFOA and PFOS within two years.
Designate PFOA and PFOS chemicals as “hazardous substances” under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) within one year and requires EPA to determine whether to list other PFAS within five years.
Designate PFOA and PFOS as “hazardous air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act within 180 days and requires EPA to determine whether to list other PFAS within five years.
Require EPA to place discharge limits on industrial releases of PFAS and provides $200 million annually for wastewater treatment.
Prohibit unsafe incineration of PFAS wastes and places a moratorium on the introduction of new PFAS into commerce.
Require comprehensive PFAS health testing.
Create a voluntary label for PFAS in cookware.
Likelihood of Passage
In 2020, the House passed a similar version of PFAS Action Act by a vote of 247-159. However, it failed to advance in the Republican-controlled Senate. The current bill’s likelihood of passage is much higher with Democrat majorities in both the Senate and the House. Whether or not it ultimately becomes law, the PFAS Action Act puts pressure on the EPA and the Biden Administration to take steps to address PFAS contamination, particularly with respect to establishing national drinking water standards. Accordingly, businesses should be prepared for additional PFAS regulations in the near term.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Teddy Eynon, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney
What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract
Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?
Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One
For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Monmouth County's Next Development Wave: What Developers and Investors Need to Know
Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Are Your Conversations with AI Shielded from Discovery? Courts Are Split
Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
