The U.S Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is Taking Steps to Regulate PFAS in Drinking Water
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is taking steps to regulate the levels of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), which are also known as PFCs. EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt announced the agency’s plans at a two-day National Leadership Summit dedicated to the two chemicals.
“It’s clear that this issue is a national priority,” Pruitt told attendees, which included representatives of 35 states, 20 agencies, 3 tribes, and dozens of other interested parties. “I’ll work with you to make sure we take action and not just raise awareness over these next couple months.”
Potential Hazards Posed by PFAS
In his remarks at the summit, Pruitt acknowledged the growing concern about PFAS’s “persistence, their durability, [sic] getting into the environment and impacting communities in an adverse way.” The chemicals, which were used in non-stick products, firefighting foam, and food packaging, have been linked to cancer, low birth weight, and other health conditions.
While U.S. manufacturers no longer use the chemicals, they can still be found in many public and private water systems. In a report that coincided with the summit, EWG concluded that an estimated 1,500 U.S. drinking water systems that supply 110 million people could have levels of PFAS that exceed what EWG deems safe. In some cases, contamination is higher than the lower standard currently offered by the EPA.
While the federal government does not currently regulate PFAS, the EPA’s health guidelines recommend a health limit of 70 parts per trillion of PFOA and PFOS combined. Many states have also implemented local regulations that set lower levels. In New Jersey, where high concentrations of the chemicals have been found, the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) set a “Maximum Contaminant Limit” of 14 parts per trillion (ppt) for PFOA in 2017. It is currently the strictest standard in the United States.
EPA’s Four-Step PCAS Plan
At the summit, Pruitt announced that the EPA is preparing to take four “critical” steps to address PCAS. Below is the agency’s plan:
EPA will initiate steps to evaluate the need for a maximum contaminant level (MCL) for PFOA and PFOS. We will convene our federal partners and examine everything we know about PFOA and PFOS in drinking water.
EPA is beginning the necessary steps to propose designating PFOA and PFOS as “hazardous substances” through one of the available statutory mechanisms, including potentially CERCLA Section 102.
EPA is currently developing groundwater cleanup recommendations for PFOA and PFOS at contaminated sites and will complete this task by fall of this year.
EPA is taking action in close collaboration with our federal and state partners to develop toxicity values for GenX and PFBS.
Notably, the EPA’s plan will establish regulatory limits on the amount of PCAS allowed in drinking water under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). “We will take the next step under the Safe Drinking Water Act process to evaluate the need of a maximum contaminant level for PFOA and PFOS,” Pruitt stated. “It’s something that has been talked about for a number of years. The process needs to begin. The determination of an MCL is something that we will begin in earnest.”
It is also significant that the EPA is considering categorizing the two chemicals as “hazardous substances” under the federal Superfund law. Among other legal repercussions, bringing PCAS under CERCLA will create a federal cause of action to hold responsible parties liable for environmental remediation costs linked with PFAS releases.
What’s Next?
Given that the federal government hasn’t established any new drinking water standards in more than two decades, it is still uncertain whether the EPA’s plans will come to fruition. Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Environmental Law Group will continue to monitor the EPA’s actions on this issue and post updates as they become available.
If you have any questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, at 201-806-3364.
What to Do If You Are Impacted by a Retailer Bankruptcy Part 2
Over the past year, brick-and-mortar stores have closed their doors at a record pace. Fluctuating consumer preferences, the rise of online shopping platforms, and ongoing economic uncertainty continue to put pressure on the retail industry. When a retailer seeks bankruptcy protection, a myriad of other businesses are often impacted. Whether you are a supplier, customer, […]
The Current Administration's Proposals for the Financial Services and Banking Industries Will Affect Your Business
Since his inauguration two months ago, Donald Trump’s administration and the Congress it controls have indicated important upcoming policy changes. These changes will impact financial services policies and priorities. The changes will particularly affect cryptocurrency, as well as banking rules and regulations. Key Regulatory Changes in Cryptocurrency For example, in the burgeoning cryptocurrency business environment, […]
Tips for Commercial Landlords Impacted by Wave of Retailer Bankruptcies Part 1
The retail sector has experienced a wave of bankruptcy filings over the last year. Brick-and-mortar businesses in financial distress include big-name brands like Big Lots, Party City, The Container Store, and Vitamin Shoppe. When large retailers seek bankruptcy protection, they are not the only businesses impacted. Landlords can be particularly hard hit. While commercial landlords […]
How Understanding Bankruptcy Trends Can Benefit Your Business
The bankruptcy legal landscape presents both challenges and opportunities for businesses navigating financial distress. Understanding current bankruptcy trends can help businesses make more informed and strategic decisions. Corporate Bankruptcy Filings Trending Upwards Bankruptcy filings continued to trend upwards in 2024. According to statistics released by the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts, personal and business […]
SEC Takes Actions Against Issuers for Failure to File Form D
In December, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced charges against two privately held companies for failing to file a Form D notice, which is generally utilized for exempt securities offerings. Here, the SEC’s enforcement sends a strong message: compliance with regulatory requirements is not optional and failure to comply can have significant consequences. […]
Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda
On February 14, 2025, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued Memorandum 25-05, “New Process for More Efficient, Effective, Accessible and Transparent Case handling.” The Memorandum rescinds nearly all of the Memoranda issued by his direct predecessor, Jennifer Abruzzo, setting the […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
