
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: October 13, 2021

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comThe Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is proposing a massive increase in the production quotas of cannabis, psilocin, and psilocybin (“magic mushrooms”) for research purposes, with the intent of aiding in the development of new federally approved therapeutic medications. The proposal highlights the growing acceptance that Schedule I substances like marijuana and psilocybin may hold great medical promise as therapeutics.
Psilocybin is a naturally occurring psychedelic prodrug compound produced by more than 200 species of fungi. Psilocybin and other psychedelics are on Schedule 1 of the federal Controlled Substances Act (CSA), just like cannabis. The designation is given to substances having “no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse.”
Nonetheless, studies have shown that psilocybin has the potential to treat a variety of psychiatric and behavioral disorders, including depression, obsessive-compulsive disorder, smoking cessation, alcohol and drug addiction, cluster headaches, and cancer-related or other end-of-life psychological distress. Cancer-related psilocybin therapy is widely regarded as the most promising areas of research for the drug.
Given its potential benefits, efforts are underway to decriminalize the drug and make it easier to pursue further medical research. Decriminalization of psychedelics via local/municipal legislation is already gaining momentum. Notably, New Jersey Gov. Phil Murphy signed legislation in February reducing penalties for possession of up to an ounce of psilocybin mushrooms by reclassifying the infraction to a disorderly person’s offense.
Section 306 of the CSA requires the Attorney General to establish aggregate production quotas (APQs) for each basic class of controlled substance listed in schedules I and II and for the list I chemicals ephedrine, pseudoephedrine, and phenylpropanolamine. The Attorney General has delegated this function to the Administrator of DEA.
The DEA’s recent proposal calls for significant increases to the APQs of the schedule I substances psilocybin, psilocin, marihuana, and marihuana extract. According to the DEA, the proposed increases are “directly related to increased interest by DEA registrants in the use of hallucinogenic controlled substances for research and clinical trial purposes.” The proposal further states: “DEA firmly believes in supporting regulated research of schedule I controlled substances. Therefore, the APQ increases reflect the need to fulfill research and development requirements in the production of new drug products, and the study of marijuana effects in particular, as necessary steps toward potential Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of new drug products.”
While the DEA regularly adjusts APQs, the language used by the DEA is notable, as it expressly highlights the prospect of new drug products using the substances. The extent of the increases is also significant. The DEA is proposing to increase production of marijuana to 2 million grams (approximately 4,400 pounds), which represents a 500,000-gram increase from its initial APQ for 2021. The DEA is also seeking to manufacture 500,000 grams of cannabis extract, which is more than twice its original APQ. With regard to psilocybin and psilocin, production will also expand significantly under the DEA proposal. The APQ for psilocybin would increase to 1,500 grams, which is a 2,900 percent increase. The DEA is proposing to produce 1,000 grams of psilocin, up from its initial 2021 proposal of 50 grams.
The DEA proposal was published in the Federal Register on September 2, 2021, and interested parties had 30 days to submit comments. Based on comments received in response to the proposal, the DEA Administrator may hold a public hearing on one or more issues raised.
While cannabis legalization continues to dominate headlines, psychedelics have the potential to be cannabis 2.0 – not because of their recreational use, but for their increasingly confirmed efficacy in medical treatment of mental health issues like PTSD, depression, anxiety (including end-of-life anxiety), and addiction, which may result in inevitable legalization. Scarinci Hollenbeck’s Cannabis Law Group is closely monitoring this rapidly evolving area of law.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact Dan McKillop or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!