
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: March 19, 2014

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe 2015 plan includes six new measures to plug leaks in the tax code that multinationals are using to avoid paying the 35 percent federal corporate tax rate imposed by the U.S. government – the highest in the industrial world.

Both sides of the debate want changes to the tax code. Corporate executives have been arguing for years for a reduction in the tax rate, but those in favor of the President’s plan argue that most multinationals don’t pay the 35 percent rate anyway, by exploiting loopholes in the tax code. GE, for example, reported that it only paid an effective tax rate of 4.2 percent in it’s most recent annual filing, according to the news source.
MSN Money explained that the plan isn’t likely to find any traction in a congress that has trouble agreeing even on general tax policy, let alone specifics. Manal Corwin, national leader of the international tax practice at KPMG LLP in Washington, explained to the news source that, in actuality, the plan is intended to set down a marker in the national tax debate.
“I don’t know that anybody’s predicting that we’re suddenly going to see tax reform happen,” said Corwin. “There are certain themes that seem to be repeating themselves.”
Under the current tax code, U.S.-based multinationals face a full 35 percent tax rate for income they make around the world after the tax they pay to local governments. As other countries have reduced their tax rates, businesses have stockpiled an estimated $2 trillion in untaxed, offshore profits. While some feel that the U.S. should lower its tax rates in order to encourage businesses to repatriate their money, others feel that the loopholes through which these businesses are avoiding the tax should be closed.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!