Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
When Can a Tweet Lead to Criminal Prosecution?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: March 4, 2014
Key Contacts
Back
In Spain, Alba González Camacho was recently convicted of inciting terrorism. While such allegations are far from rare in today’s world, her modus operandi—social media.
As reported in The New York Times, prosecutors contend that Camacho’s Twitter posts, which called on the disbanded terror group Grapo to kill several Spanish politicians, crossed the free speech line into illegal behavior. Prosecutors argued specifically that the “messages [contained] an ideological content that was highly radicalized and violent” and, hence, violated a provision of the Spanish Constitution that prohibits any apology for or glorification of terrorism. Camacho, 21, was sentenced to one year in prison, but will not serve jail time under the terms of a plea agreement.
While many Americans may think that something like this could not happen in the United States, it already has. An Alabama man is currently in jail for threatening to kill President Barak Obama via Twitter. His tweets included: “Free speech? Really? Let’s test this! Let’s kill the president”; “I’m going to finish this, if they get me, they get me! #ohwell”; I” think we could get the president with cyanide. #MakeItSlow”; and “Barack Obama, I wish you were DEAD!”
In 2013, Jarvis M. Britton, 26, pleaded guilty to violating a federal law that makes it a felony to knowingly and willfully convey a communication making “any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States.” Unlike other statutes criminalizing threatening behavior, prosecutors do not have to prove that defendant intended to carry out the threats under this Threats Against President statute. Several other social media users face similar prosecution.
These cases highlight the tension between freedom of expression and public safety. While the First Amendment guarantees our right to free speech, true threats fall outside Constitutional protection. Determining whether a threat is legitimate or simply political discontent is left up to the courts. Unfortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court has offered limited guidance regarding when speech crosses the line from protected speech into unprotected threats.
Determining whether social media rants amount to legitimate threats adds yet another layer to this complex area of law. While Twitter provides a platform for users to speak their mind, 140 characters or less could also land you in a courtroom, or worse – jail.
If you have any questions about these cases or would like to discuss the issues involved, please contact me, Fernando Pinguelo, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouseWatch and Cyber Jurist.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
Commercial Zoning: What Every Business Owner Needs to Know
If you operate a business, you need to understand how commercial zoning rules may impact you. For instance, zoning regulations can determine how you can develop a property and what type of activities your business can conduct. To ensure that you aren’t taken by surprise, it is always a good idea to consult with experienced […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
When Can a Tweet Lead to Criminal Prosecution?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
In Spain, Alba González Camacho was recently convicted of inciting terrorism. While such allegations are far from rare in today’s world, her modus operandi—social media.
As reported in The New York Times, prosecutors contend that Camacho’s Twitter posts, which called on the disbanded terror group Grapo to kill several Spanish politicians, crossed the free speech line into illegal behavior. Prosecutors argued specifically that the “messages [contained] an ideological content that was highly radicalized and violent” and, hence, violated a provision of the Spanish Constitution that prohibits any apology for or glorification of terrorism. Camacho, 21, was sentenced to one year in prison, but will not serve jail time under the terms of a plea agreement.
While many Americans may think that something like this could not happen in the United States, it already has. An Alabama man is currently in jail for threatening to kill President Barak Obama via Twitter. His tweets included: “Free speech? Really? Let’s test this! Let’s kill the president”; “I’m going to finish this, if they get me, they get me! #ohwell”; I” think we could get the president with cyanide. #MakeItSlow”; and “Barack Obama, I wish you were DEAD!”
In 2013, Jarvis M. Britton, 26, pleaded guilty to violating a federal law that makes it a felony to knowingly and willfully convey a communication making “any threat to take the life of, to kidnap, or to inflict bodily harm upon the President of the United States.” Unlike other statutes criminalizing threatening behavior, prosecutors do not have to prove that defendant intended to carry out the threats under this Threats Against President statute. Several other social media users face similar prosecution.
These cases highlight the tension between freedom of expression and public safety. While the First Amendment guarantees our right to free speech, true threats fall outside Constitutional protection. Determining whether a threat is legitimate or simply political discontent is left up to the courts. Unfortunately, the U.S. Supreme Court has offered limited guidance regarding when speech crosses the line from protected speech into unprotected threats.
Determining whether social media rants amount to legitimate threats adds yet another layer to this complex area of law. While Twitter provides a platform for users to speak their mind, 140 characters or less could also land you in a courtroom, or worse – jail.
If you have any questions about these cases or would like to discuss the issues involved, please contact me, Fernando Pinguelo, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work. To learn more about data privacy and security, visit eWhiteHouseWatch and Cyber Jurist.