Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 9, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comCryptology provides the means to keep electronic information secure by protecting the electronic system as a whole, and by securing individual pieces of information (“bit”), even if the system itself is compromised. However, the Achilles heel to all data protection methods is that none is mathematically perfect. That is, no protection algorithm, even removing the computer from an Internet connection, guarantees data security.

Encryption is an element of cryptography. Cryptography is the most utilized method of data security and the primary focus of this series. At a basic level, encryption is easy to understand. It is just the process of using a cypher.
For example, if I want to exchange a written note with someone, but I don’t want others to be able to read it, I will use a cypher. Let’s say that I want to send my classmate a message, “This class is boring.” My classmate and I agree on the method that every letter in the message will be moved one letter over in the alphabet and “z” will be “a.” This is called the encryption “key.” So the message would read, “Sijt dmbtt jt cpsjoh.” Because my classmate also knows the key, he can decypher the message, and, no doubt, promptly agree.
This is a “symmetric-key algorithm,” because both my classmate and I must know the same key in order to use the cypher. Computer networks generally find this system completely unfeasible, because one has to manage all of these private keys and remember what key belongs to what message. Moreover, the number of keys grows exponentially with the number of network members. So, only 100 network members requires 10,000 different keys, all of which must be kept secret and correctly assigned.
The “public-key algorithm” solves this problem by giving a user a “public key” and a “private key.” Anyone wishing to send a message would find a readily accessible public key and apply it to the message before sending it to a user. Thus, anyone who wants to send a user an encrypted message can do so. However, to decrypt the message that user needs to use his or her private key.
Beyond the obvious problem of someone stealing the private key in either scenario is the problem that someone can figure it out. If someone looks at the message I sent earlier, “Sijt dmbtt jt cpsjoh,” through a simple process of guess-and-check, one might figure out that all I did was move each letter over one spot in the alphabet. Computers can perform a guess-and-check regime against encryption to “crack” the secret key. Therefore, to make the keys secure, computer encryption relies on “mathematical hardness,” or that the math involved to crack the key is so involved that not even a supercomputer, working at the problem for years, can crack it.
This is the basic idea behind encryption and keeping data secure. However, any method, including those not discussed here, has either mathematical weaknesses or practical weaknesses. In short, no system is truly secure. The consequences can be devastating. However, good practice and knowledge of both lawful protections and lawful remedies can minimize risk and maximize efficiency for operating in an ever-increasing digital world.
Related Article:
Cyber Insecurity: Ashley Madison Encrypted Passwords Cracked.
Survey Reveals Many Business Executives Lack Cybersecurity Confidence
Top Cybersecurity Threats Unveiled by Hackers – Is Anyone Safe?
Additional information and resources:
Cyber Security And Data Protection Group
Intellectual Property And Technology
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!