Use It or Lose It! USPTO Enacting Trademark Audit Regarding Usage of Registered Trademarks
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has been seeking to clean up the federal trademark register by removing trademark registrations that are no longer in use. As part of this effort, the USPTO may now require a trademark audit seeking additional proof of use to verify the accuracy of claims that a trademark is in use in commerce in connection with particular goods/ services identified in the trademark registration.
Trademark owners have always been required to take steps to keep their registrations in force, namely by filing specific documents with the USPTO at regular intervals. The first such trademark filing, called a Declaration of Use, is due before the end of the 6-year period after the registration date or within a 6-month grace period thereafter. A Declaration of Use consists in part of a sworn statement that the registered trademark is in use in commerce due to special circumstances that excuse such nonuse and is not due to any intention to abandon the trademark registration.
Federal trademark registrations issued on or after November 16, 1989, remain in force for 10 years and may be renewed for 10-year periods. Accordingly, between the 9th and 10th year after the registration date and every 10 years thereafter, the owner must file a Combined Declaration of Use or Excusable Nonuse and Application for Renewal. Failure to file the required IP maintenance documents during the specified time periods will result in the cancellation of the U.S. trademark registration.
Additional Requirements Under the New Rules
To show continued use, registered owners were previously required to provide a list of the goods/services recited in the trademark registration on or in connection with which the trademark is in use, as well as a single specimen of the trademark per class of goods or services. Under the amended regulations, the USPTO may require the submission of information, exhibits, affidavits or declarations, and such additional specimens of use as may be reasonably necessary for the USPTO to verify the accuracy of claims that a trademark is in use in commerce in connection with all of the goods or services listed in the registration.
In support of the heightened scrutiny, the USPTO cites a two-year audit program that suggested that many registered marks were not actually being used in connection with the goods or services identified in the registrations. The USPTO randomly selected 500 registrations for which Declarations of Use and Renewal affidavits were filed. In 51 percent of the registrations selected for the pilot, the trademark owners failed to supply additional verified proof of use on specific goods or services for which use in commerce was initially claimed.
As the USPTO explained in the , the changes will help facilitate the USPTO’s ability to assess and promote the integrity of the trademark register.
Trademark Audit Program
The USPTO is also launching a new audit program to conduct random audits of Declaration of Use and Renewal affidavits in which the mark is registered for more than one good or service per class. The agency initially plans to conduct random audits of up to approximately 10 percent of the affidavits received each year and may increase the percentage going forward. If flagged for trademark audit, owners may be required to provide additional proof of use in the nature of information, exhibits, affidavits or declarations, and specimens showing use in commerce.
In light of the amendments, trademark registrants should be prepared to provide evidence of use for all claimed goods and services when filing a Declaration of Use or Renewal application. Accordingly, it is recommended to keep accurate records of use of each covered goods or services and to periodically review the sufficiency of such evidence.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, David Einhorn, at 201-806-3364.
High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies
Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights
Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?
New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
