Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 11, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) is further extending the time to file certain patent and trademark-related documents and to pay certain required fees in light of the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. Deadlines have now been extended to June 1, 2020, for those impacted.
As discussed in greater detail in a prior article, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security (CARES) Act authorized the USPTO to extend the statutory filing deadlines in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. On March 31, the USPTO exercised that authority by providing the possibility of a 30-day extension of certain due dates in patent and trademarks matters that had an original due date between March 27 and April 30, 2020. On April 28, 2020, the USPTO granted additional relief to trademark and patent owners.
The USPTO’s patent relief is set forth in a notice titled “Notice of Extended Waiver of Patent-Related Timing Deadlines Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and Other Relief Available to Patent Applicants and Patentees.” For deadlines in patent applications, reexamination proceedings, and proceedings before the PTAB, other than trial proceedings, if an eligible document or fee was or is due between (and inclusive of) March 27, 2020, and May 31, 2020, the filing will be considered timely if filed on or before June 1, 2020, provided that the filing is accompanied by a statement that the delay in filing or payment was due to the COVID-19 outbreak.
A delay is “due” to the COVID-19 outbreak when the outbreak materially interfered with the filing of a paper or fee. Circumstances that qualify as materially interfering include, without limitation, office closures, cash flow interruptions, lack of access to files or other materials, travel delays, personal or family illness, or other similar circumstances. The person affected by the outbreak may be a practitioner, applicant, patent owner, petitioner, third-party requester, inventor, or other person associated with the filing or fee.
For a trial proceeding before the PTAB, if an eligible filing was or is due between (and inclusive of) March 27, 2020, and April 30, 2020, the filing will be considered timely if made within 30 days of the original due date, provided that the filing is accompanied by a statement that the delay in filing or payment was due to the COVID-19 outbreak. For filings due after April 30, 2020, parties must contact PTAB for a request for relief.
The USPTO also extended certain trademark filing and payment deadlines, as set forth in its “Notice of Extended Waiver of Trademark-Related Timing Deadlines Under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act and Other Relief Available to Trademark Applicants and Trademark Owners.”
If an eligible document or fee was or is due between (and inclusive of) March 27, 2020, and May 31, 2020, the filing will be considered timely if filed on or before June 1, 2020, provided that the filing is accompanied by a statement that the delay in filing or payment was due to the COVID-19 outbreak. The following filings are eligible for the period of relief:
For trademark applications that were abandoned and registrations that were canceled/expired due to an inability to timely respond to a Trademark-related Office communication having a due date of May 31, 2020, or earlier as a result of the effects of the COVID-19 outbreak, the USPTO has waived the petition fee to revive the abandoned application or reinstate the canceled/expired registration.
According to the USPTO, it will continue to evaluate the evolving situation around the COVID-19 outbreak and the impact on the USPTO’s operations and stakeholders. If the USPTO further extends the CARES Act relief, we will provide updates here.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, David Einhorn, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

Before buying property, it is critical to determine whether local zoning laws may affect your plans. If you plan to redevelop the property, you will want to confirm that local zoning regulations permit development as intended. If acquiring property that is already developed, you must verify that the use is permitted in the underlying zoning […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

For parents of a child with a disability, estate planning raises concerns that go well beyond deciding who will inherit their assets. Parents may spend years making sure their child has the right care, services, and support. Eventually, they must also confront a difficult question: Who will take over when they can no longer do […]
Author: George McGowan

Before buying a New Jersey rental property, an investor should verify realistic operating numbers, the property’s legal and regulatory status, lead-based paint and flood compliance, the existing leases and tenant protections, and the right ownership structure. A rental property is more than a piece of real estate; it is an operating business subject to legal, […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

In New Jersey, an irrevocable trust can sometimes be modified even though its name suggests otherwise, and one of the primary tools for doing so is a process called decanting. Whether decanting is available depends on the specific terms of the trust and the discretion given to the trustee. Key takeaways: New Jersey has no […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Author: Jay McDaniel
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!