
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: September 6, 2013

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThere is a difficult and uneasy relationship between the Federal Income Tax (FIT) and the New Jersey Gross Income Tax (NJGIT). Despite the fact that the income for FIT purposes is the starting point for NJGIT purposes, there are significant differences. One observation is that NJGIT is unfriendly when it comes to the types of deductions allowed, the ability to carry losses to other years, and offsetting income and losses from different categories.
In Warsal v. Director, the differences between a FIT non-business bad-debt loss and NJGIT treatment is readily apparent. Although NJGIT permits some losses to be recognized, it does not provide for federal treatment to carryover to New Jersey in every case. The issue was whether the bad debt owed by a family member was a sale or disposition for NJGIT purposes. The court held that it was not and therefore was not deductible. Although the debt was deductible for federal purposes as a non-business bad debt that theory was not recognized for NJGIT. The taxpayer advanced the theory that the debtor’s non-payment constituted a “disposition” under state law which permitted the taxpayer to recognize gain or loss.
A second issue was whether the federal treatment of the bad debt constituted a “method of accounting” that the state must follow for NJGIT purposes. The court stated that it was not a method of accounting to be imported into state law.
A second issue involves losses from S corporations. State Tax Bulletin GIT – 9S provides that: In no case can you adjust your New Jersey adjusted basis in the stock below zero. S corporation losses which you are unable to use for New Jersey gross income tax purposes to offset income from another S corporation in the year the losses are incurred may not be used to offset S corporation income in any other taxable year. However, such unused losses will be used to adjust your New Jersey adjusted basis when calculating your gain/loss from the disposition of your shares of the S corporation
N.J.S.A.54A:5-2 only permits losses to offset income of the same class incurred in the same year. The state required taxpayers to reduce their state basis even when they were unable to use the losses and such a view prevailed until the a defeat in court.
In the aftermath of 2008, many businesses generated losses. Unfortunately, the losses from prior years were of no help for NJGIT purposes when the major asset was sold. One taxpayer recognized gain for NJGIT paid state income tax but did not for FIT. In net economic terms, the taxpayer lost money even with the proceeds of sale. Planning is imperative.
New Jersey and taxpayers are not perfect together.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!