
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: March 11, 2015

Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comAs we previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law News Blog, President Barak Obama recently unveiled a plan to ease the Cuban embargo. Ultimately, economic and diplomatic changes to the Cuban Assets Control Regulations and the Export Administration Regulations may lead to new opportunities for U.S. businesses.
While current statistics are unavailable, U.S. companies had registered 4,000 trademarks within the Republic of Cuba as of 2002, according to the U.S.-Cuba Trade and Economic Council, Inc. Well-known brands include Starbucks Coffee, Home Depot and MasterCard.
Those who may think it’s too soon to protect their intellectual property in Cuba need only look to the legal issues U.S. corporations have experienced in China. Many international corporations, including Tesla, Pfizer and Apple, have expanded into the Chinese market only to discover that so-called trademark “squatters” had already registered their brands. As a result, they have been forced to enter protracted legal battles or pay significant sums to buy back their trademarks.
Cuba also has a “first to file” system under which trademark rights are generally bestowed on the first entity to file an application. Accordingly, there is incentive for brand counterfeiters and hijackers to pursue trademark rights ahead of U.S. companies.
For multi-national businesses, registering your trademark may be relatively easy. If you have already registered your trademark internationally under the Madrid Protocol, you simply need to add Cuba as one of the designated jurisdictions in which you want to seek protection. Companies that have not yet taken advantage of the ability to register trademarks in multiple countries under the international treaty can also pursue this avenue; however, the process will be slightly more complex.
The other option to protect your trademark in Cuba is to file a national Cuban trademark application with the Oficina Cubana de la Propiedad Industrial (OCPI). Under existing regulations enacted during the Clinton Administration, U.S. businesses are authorized to pay expenses for intellectual property protection in Cuba. Accordingly, companies can pay filing fees and retain local agents in Cuba to pursue trademark protection.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!