
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: May 13, 2013

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe Senate passed The Marketplace Fairness Act (the “Act”) and sent the bill for consideration to the House. The Act provides that internet retailers must collect sales tax on out-of-state transactions reversing the holdings of cases and interpretations of statutes that protected out-of-state sellers for decades.

There is a long history of case law that prevented out-of-state businesses from being subject to taxation or collecting taxes unless the business had “sufficient contacts” with the state to justify this jurisdiction. Prior to the internet, jurisdictional issues arose out of travelling salesmen, title passage rules and drop shipments. More sophisticated questions arose out of intercompany fees for licensing intangibles, leased employees and order fulfillment centers. States, however, could not exert jurisdiction over a non-resident seller who took orders over the internet. Instead, states relied on their citizens to pay use tax on out-of-state purchases.
In order for a state to obtain the privileges of the Act, the state must either adopt the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement or adhere to a more simplified sales tax measure. The key measure in either case is that the location of the buyer determines the sales tax rate and state to which it is paid. This will create a more level playing field between brick and mortar retailers and internet retailers. It will certainly help states to collect revenue.
If this precedent is overcome, it will not be long before a VAT could be imposed. European countries impose a VAT on sales of goods and services. The proponents of a VAT cite the sophistication of software to do the reporting and tax calculation. I predict that we will do the same to capture more transactions in the tax net.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!