
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: May 13, 2013
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe Senate passed The Marketplace Fairness Act (the “Act”) and sent the bill for consideration to the House. The Act provides that internet retailers must collect sales tax on out-of-state transactions reversing the holdings of cases and interpretations of statutes that protected out-of-state sellers for decades.
There is a long history of case law that prevented out-of-state businesses from being subject to taxation or collecting taxes unless the business had “sufficient contacts” with the state to justify this jurisdiction. Prior to the internet, jurisdictional issues arose out of travelling salesmen, title passage rules and drop shipments. More sophisticated questions arose out of intercompany fees for licensing intangibles, leased employees and order fulfillment centers. States, however, could not exert jurisdiction over a non-resident seller who took orders over the internet. Instead, states relied on their citizens to pay use tax on out-of-state purchases.
In order for a state to obtain the privileges of the Act, the state must either adopt the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement or adhere to a more simplified sales tax measure. The key measure in either case is that the location of the buyer determines the sales tax rate and state to which it is paid. This will create a more level playing field between brick and mortar retailers and internet retailers. It will certainly help states to collect revenue.
If this precedent is overcome, it will not be long before a VAT could be imposed. European countries impose a VAT on sales of goods and services. The proponents of a VAT cite the sophistication of software to do the reporting and tax calculation. I predict that we will do the same to capture more transactions in the tax net.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Senate passed The Marketplace Fairness Act (the “Act”) and sent the bill for consideration to the House. The Act provides that internet retailers must collect sales tax on out-of-state transactions reversing the holdings of cases and interpretations of statutes that protected out-of-state sellers for decades.
There is a long history of case law that prevented out-of-state businesses from being subject to taxation or collecting taxes unless the business had “sufficient contacts” with the state to justify this jurisdiction. Prior to the internet, jurisdictional issues arose out of travelling salesmen, title passage rules and drop shipments. More sophisticated questions arose out of intercompany fees for licensing intangibles, leased employees and order fulfillment centers. States, however, could not exert jurisdiction over a non-resident seller who took orders over the internet. Instead, states relied on their citizens to pay use tax on out-of-state purchases.
In order for a state to obtain the privileges of the Act, the state must either adopt the Streamlined Sales and Use Tax Agreement or adhere to a more simplified sales tax measure. The key measure in either case is that the location of the buyer determines the sales tax rate and state to which it is paid. This will create a more level playing field between brick and mortar retailers and internet retailers. It will certainly help states to collect revenue.
If this precedent is overcome, it will not be long before a VAT could be imposed. European countries impose a VAT on sales of goods and services. The proponents of a VAT cite the sophistication of software to do the reporting and tax calculation. I predict that we will do the same to capture more transactions in the tax net.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!