Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: May 21, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
There generally are two types of inventors: the individual inventor/small company and the large, corporate research and development (R&D) groups.
The good news for the individual inventor is that they can “level the playing field” with the use of a professional patent search.
There are dozens of companies that are dedicated to performing exhaustive patent searches for individual investors and small businesses. Because a searcher has access to the same proprietary databases as the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), he or she can notify inventors of any previous iterations of the invention-otherwise known as prior art. Something is considered prior art if it consists of other patents, applications, or publications that have been published and are “out there” already.
Evaluating a patent searcher’s report offers a glimpse into the mind of the USPTO and what a Patent Examiner is going to consider when reviewing an application. This level of insight can be invaluable given that most patent applications are denied the first time they are filed and you can know what the overall “patent landscape” looks like when drafting and prosecuting a patent application.
“Prosecuting a patent” is the term given to the sometimes long and arduous back-and-forth process between the inventor and the USPTO regarding what should be protected, how the invention is different from prior art, and the breadth of protection that should be granted. As the name implies, prosecuting a patent is a semi-adversarial process.
Boiled down to basics, prosecuting a patent often involves examining the components of an invention and asserting the uniqueness of one or more of those components. For instance, if an existing product is composed of components A + B + C, an inventor may successfully prosecute a patent using the components A2 + B + C. In other words, it is prudent to methodically develop the new, innovative variations applied to an established patent (A2 in this example).
Investing in a patent search helps inventors identify any potential problems they may encounter during the prosecution of a patent. Once the weakness is known, we can begin to focus on the solution, whether it be changing a component of the invention or using different language in the drafting process. It’s always good to know what is out there and what the possibilities are, and a search can provide that understanding.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!