No one would want to complete the process of applying for a patent only to find out that it has already been claimed.
There generally are two types of inventors: the individual inventor/small company and the large, corporate research and development (R&D) groups.
R&D groups generally have a significant advantage over smaller entities because they are well-connected in the intellectual property community and they have ample capital.
Individual inventors have to function with fewer resources and a smaller network of colleagues.
The good news for the individual inventor is that they can “level the playing field” with the use of a professional patent search.
There are dozens of companies that are dedicated to performing exhaustive patent searches for individual investors and small businesses. Because a searcher has access to the same proprietary databases as the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), he or she can notify inventors of any previous iterations of the invention-otherwise known as prior art. Something is considered prior art if it consists of other patents, applications, or publications that have been published and are “out there” already.
A patent search adds an additional expense to the process, but it is one that is well worth it.
Evaluating a patent searcher’s report offers a glimpse into the mind of the USPTO and what a Patent Examiner is going to consider when reviewing an application. This level of insight can be invaluable given that most patent applications are denied the first time they are filed and you can know what the overall “patent landscape” looks like when drafting and prosecuting a patent application.
“Prosecuting a patent” is the term given to the sometimes long and arduous back-and-forth process between the inventor and the USPTO regarding what should be protected, how the invention is different from prior art, and the breadth of protection that should be granted. As the name implies, prosecuting a patent is a semi-adversarial process.
Boiled down to basics, prosecuting a patent often involves examining the components of an invention and asserting the uniqueness of one or more of those components. For instance, if an existing product is composed of components A + B + C, an inventor may successfully prosecute a patent using the components A2 + B + C. In other words, it is prudent to methodically develop the new, innovative variations applied to an established patent (A2 in this example).
Investing in a patent search helps inventors identify any potential problems they may encounter during the prosecution of a patent. Once the weakness is known, we can begin to focus on the solution, whether it be changing a component of the invention or using different language in the drafting process. It’s always good to know what is out there and what the possibilities are, and a search can provide that understanding.
Redefining Labor Relations: NLRB's Pivot from Abruzzo’s Memoranda
On February 14, 2025, the Office of General Counsel (OGC) of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) under Acting General Counsel William B. Cowen issued Memorandum 25-05, “New Process for More Efficient, Effective, Accessible and Transparent Case handling.” The Memorandum rescinds nearly all of the Memoranda issued by his direct predecessor, Jennifer Abruzzo, setting the […]
If you purchase real property from a foreign person or entity, you may be required to withhold taxes from your payment to the seller under the Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). The federal tax law is designed to ensure that foreign sellers pay any applicable capital gains tax on profits realized from […]
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
The Benefits Of A Patent Search Are Worth The Cost
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
No one would want to complete the process of applying for a patent only to find out that it has already been claimed.
There generally are two types of inventors: the individual inventor/small company and the large, corporate research and development (R&D) groups.
R&D groups generally have a significant advantage over smaller entities because they are well-connected in the intellectual property community and they have ample capital.
Individual inventors have to function with fewer resources and a smaller network of colleagues.
The good news for the individual inventor is that they can “level the playing field” with the use of a professional patent search.
There are dozens of companies that are dedicated to performing exhaustive patent searches for individual investors and small businesses. Because a searcher has access to the same proprietary databases as the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), he or she can notify inventors of any previous iterations of the invention-otherwise known as prior art. Something is considered prior art if it consists of other patents, applications, or publications that have been published and are “out there” already.
A patent search adds an additional expense to the process, but it is one that is well worth it.
Evaluating a patent searcher’s report offers a glimpse into the mind of the USPTO and what a Patent Examiner is going to consider when reviewing an application. This level of insight can be invaluable given that most patent applications are denied the first time they are filed and you can know what the overall “patent landscape” looks like when drafting and prosecuting a patent application.
“Prosecuting a patent” is the term given to the sometimes long and arduous back-and-forth process between the inventor and the USPTO regarding what should be protected, how the invention is different from prior art, and the breadth of protection that should be granted. As the name implies, prosecuting a patent is a semi-adversarial process.
Boiled down to basics, prosecuting a patent often involves examining the components of an invention and asserting the uniqueness of one or more of those components. For instance, if an existing product is composed of components A + B + C, an inventor may successfully prosecute a patent using the components A2 + B + C. In other words, it is prudent to methodically develop the new, innovative variations applied to an established patent (A2 in this example).
Investing in a patent search helps inventors identify any potential problems they may encounter during the prosecution of a patent. Once the weakness is known, we can begin to focus on the solution, whether it be changing a component of the invention or using different language in the drafting process. It’s always good to know what is out there and what the possibilities are, and a search can provide that understanding.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
