Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 24, 2016
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe Department of Labor recently issued its final regulations to alter the definition of a fiduciary under ERISA effective Apr. 10, 2017. These “conflict of interest” rules will expand ERISA protections for participants by broadening the personnel treated as fiduciaries which render fee-based investment advice.
With the new rules, the DOL intends to redefine fiduciary investment advice by requiring advisers for ERISA-governed retirement plans and IRAs to act within the definition of ERISA. This move was also intended to summarize the code of conduct for investment advisers specific to provisions for ERISA plan sponsors.
While the final regulations are geared toward investment advisers, they will significantly affect plan sponsors themselves.
Advisers are categorized as fiduciaries rendering investment advice when they offer suggestions to plans, plan fiduciaries, participants, beneficiaries and IRA account owners. According to the National Law Review, these recommendations from advisers are deemed investment advice when there are specific suggestions to engage or avoid certain investments. When investment communication is tailored to an individual, it is more likely to be considered a recommendation – particularly in exchange for fee or other forms of direct or indirect compensation.
Some of these exclusions include employees of plan sponsors, plan fiduciaries, employee benefit plans, affiliates or employee organizations. This is true so long as these entities receive normal compensation for work performed.
Any programs that do not have an investment component, such as health and welfare plans, are also exempt.
The same applies for platforms of investment alternatives. These are exempt so long as advisers present these platforms to plan fiduciaries as impartial suggestions or explain that the advice is not intended as investment recommendations.
Asset valuations are also exempt from the fiduciary definition under the new rules. However, the DOL has stated that it will seek to address asset valuation issues with further regulations.
While the regulations will be effective Apr. 10, 2017, advisers will have until Jan. 1, 2018 to ensure compliance with the “best interest contract exemption”. This provision enables advisers to provide investment recommendations as long as they give “advice in the client’s best interest, charge only reasonable compensation, and avoid misleading statements about fees and conflicts of interest.”
The exemption requires advisers to disclose all conflicts of interest and remove any financial incentives for investment advice that may not be in the client’s best interest.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!