Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case in which a Wisconsin woman and a bankruptcy trustee are battling over the rights to the $293,000 IRA that the woman inherited from her mother, according to The Wall Street Journal. Heidi Heffron-Clark, 35, and her husband feel that the IRA that Heffron-Clark’s mother passed down to her in 2001 is off-limits to the trustee who was appointed by the Office of the United States Trustee after Heffron-Clark and her husband filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law in 2009.
This case gives the Supreme Court the chance to clarify language on the matter, which has been described as unclear, according to the news source. Bankruptcy law allows a person to keep up to $1.3 million in retirement funds saved in an IRA, but there is little indication as to whether Congress intended for this rule to apply to IRA money that was inherited, rather than accumulated by the debtor herself.
Justice Steven Breyer explained in court that the case was a difficult one, because common sense hadn’t brought him any closer to finding a solution, according to Bloomberg. He noted that the exemption for IRAs is the only one not limited by the words of the statute to property of the bankrupt, suggesting that Congress may have intended the exemption to apply to IRAs regardless of who established the account. Justice Elena Kagan, on the other hand, suggested that it would be strange for the exemption to apply to an inherited IRA, because the bankrupt party cannot make contributions to the account.
The Wall Street Journal noted that this issue is important to resolve now, before the generation of aging baby boomers begins leaving more IRAs to its children. A decision from the Supreme Court is expected before the end of June.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights, Corporate Transactions & Business, Bankruptcy Litigation, Tax and Trusts & Estates
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, New York City, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
What Founders Can Learn From Start-up Suits
High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Corporate Governance Reviews: A Practical Guide for New Jersey Companies
Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck
What to Do After Being Served with a Lawsuit: Steps to Protect Your Legal Rights
Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
Will 2026 Be a Banner Year for SPACs? Understanding the Risks and Opportunities
Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Why Compliance Monitoring Matters for NY and NJ Businesses
Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher
When Are New Jersey Business Owners Personally Liable for Corporate Debt?
New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.