Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comKey Contacts
Back
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case in which a Wisconsin woman and a bankruptcy trustee are battling over the rights to the $293,000 IRA that the woman inherited from her mother, according to The Wall Street Journal. Heidi Heffron-Clark, 35, and her husband feel that the IRA that Heffron-Clark’s mother passed down to her in 2001 is off-limits to the trustee who was appointed by the Office of the United States Trustee after Heffron-Clark and her husband filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law in 2009.
This case gives the Supreme Court the chance to clarify language on the matter, which has been described as unclear, according to the news source. Bankruptcy law allows a person to keep up to $1.3 million in retirement funds saved in an IRA, but there is little indication as to whether Congress intended for this rule to apply to IRA money that was inherited, rather than accumulated by the debtor herself.
Justice Steven Breyer explained in court that the case was a difficult one, because common sense hadn’t brought him any closer to finding a solution, according to Bloomberg. He noted that the exemption for IRAs is the only one not limited by the words of the statute to property of the bankrupt, suggesting that Congress may have intended the exemption to apply to IRAs regardless of who established the account. Justice Elena Kagan, on the other hand, suggested that it would be strange for the exemption to apply to an inherited IRA, because the bankrupt party cannot make contributions to the account.
The Wall Street Journal noted that this issue is important to resolve now, before the generation of aging baby boomers begins leaving more IRAs to its children. A decision from the Supreme Court is expected before the end of June.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Supreme Court to rule on inherited IRAs
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
The Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case in which a Wisconsin woman and a bankruptcy trustee are battling over the rights to the $293,000 IRA that the woman inherited from her mother, according to The Wall Street Journal. Heidi Heffron-Clark, 35, and her husband feel that the IRA that Heffron-Clark’s mother passed down to her in 2001 is off-limits to the trustee who was appointed by the Office of the United States Trustee after Heffron-Clark and her husband filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law in 2009.
This case gives the Supreme Court the chance to clarify language on the matter, which has been described as unclear, according to the news source. Bankruptcy law allows a person to keep up to $1.3 million in retirement funds saved in an IRA, but there is little indication as to whether Congress intended for this rule to apply to IRA money that was inherited, rather than accumulated by the debtor herself.
Justice Steven Breyer explained in court that the case was a difficult one, because common sense hadn’t brought him any closer to finding a solution, according to Bloomberg. He noted that the exemption for IRAs is the only one not limited by the words of the statute to property of the bankrupt, suggesting that Congress may have intended the exemption to apply to IRAs regardless of who established the account. Justice Elena Kagan, on the other hand, suggested that it would be strange for the exemption to apply to an inherited IRA, because the bankrupt party cannot make contributions to the account.
The Wall Street Journal noted that this issue is important to resolve now, before the generation of aging baby boomers begins leaving more IRAs to its children. A decision from the Supreme Court is expected before the end of June.