
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comPartner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comThe Supreme Court heard oral arguments in a case in which a Wisconsin woman and a bankruptcy trustee are battling over the rights to the $293,000 IRA that the woman inherited from her mother, according to The Wall Street Journal. Heidi Heffron-Clark, 35, and her husband feel that the IRA that Heffron-Clark’s mother passed down to her in 2001 is off-limits to the trustee who was appointed by the Office of the United States Trustee after Heffron-Clark and her husband filed for protection under Chapter 7 of the bankruptcy law in 2009.
This case gives the Supreme Court the chance to clarify language on the matter, which has been described as unclear, according to the news source. Bankruptcy law allows a person to keep up to $1.3 million in retirement funds saved in an IRA, but there is little indication as to whether Congress intended for this rule to apply to IRA money that was inherited, rather than accumulated by the debtor herself.
Justice Steven Breyer explained in court that the case was a difficult one, because common sense hadn’t brought him any closer to finding a solution, according to Bloomberg. He noted that the exemption for IRAs is the only one not limited by the words of the statute to property of the bankrupt, suggesting that Congress may have intended the exemption to apply to IRAs regardless of who established the account. Justice Elena Kagan, on the other hand, suggested that it would be strange for the exemption to apply to an inherited IRA, because the bankrupt party cannot make contributions to the account.
The Wall Street Journal noted that this issue is important to resolve now, before the generation of aging baby boomers begins leaving more IRAs to its children. A decision from the Supreme Court is expected before the end of June.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!