Enforcement actions initiated by whistleblowers tend to be more costly than others, according to a recent study. Researchers also found that the complaints of whistle blowers have influenced the severity of financial penalties, length of prison sentences, and duration of the actions.
The study examined the effect of employee whistleblowers on the consequences of financial misrepresentation enforcement actions brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) between 1978 and 2012. The data revealed that of the 1,133 firms subject to financial misrepresentation enforcement actions between 1978 and 2012, 145 are associated with at least one whistleblower complaint. To isolate the impact of whistleblowers, researchers controlled for a number of other variables, such as the number of executives involved.
“Even after holding all those things constant, we see that whistleblowers have a very big effect,” said Nate Sharp, an associate professor at Texas A&M University and one of the co-authors of the paper.
Below are several specific findings of note:
The involvement of a whistleblower increased the likelihood of an enforcement action.
Whistleblower involvement is associated with $90.16 to $92.88 million greater firm penalties than if no whistleblower was involved.
Fines assessed against executives and other employees averaged $50.22 to $56.50 million more than if no whistleblower was involved.
When whistleblowers are associated with an enforcement action, executives and employees at targeted firms are sentenced to prison on average 21.86 to 27.02 months longer than if no whistleblower was involved.
Cases involving a whistleblower continued for about 10 months (10.7%) longer than actions in which no whistleblower was involved.
The odds of a firm facing an enforcement action are 5.76 times greater among firms with prior whistleblower complaints.
As we have previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck business blog, whistleblower claims have also increased in recent years, in large part due to government programs that provide financial awards to whistleblowers who provide original information that leads to a successful enforcement action resulting in monetary sanctions. For instance, the SEC recently announced that it awarded $35 million to nine tipsters in FY 2014.
To help ensure that you are not on the receiving end of costly and time consuming enforcement action, it is imperative to have effective internal policies and procedures that encourage employees to address their concerns in-house rather than reporting them directly to the federal government.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Study Reveals the Impact of Whistle Blowers
Author: Dan Brecher
Enforcement actions initiated by whistleblowers tend to be more costly than others, according to a recent study. Researchers also found that the complaints of whistle blowers have influenced the severity of financial penalties, length of prison sentences, and duration of the actions.
The study examined the effect of employee whistleblowers on the consequences of financial misrepresentation enforcement actions brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Department of Justice (DOJ) between 1978 and 2012. The data revealed that of the 1,133 firms subject to financial misrepresentation enforcement actions between 1978 and 2012, 145 are associated with at least one whistleblower complaint. To isolate the impact of whistleblowers, researchers controlled for a number of other variables, such as the number of executives involved.
“Even after holding all those things constant, we see that whistleblowers have a very big effect,” said Nate Sharp, an associate professor at Texas A&M University and one of the co-authors of the paper.
Below are several specific findings of note:
The involvement of a whistleblower increased the likelihood of an enforcement action.
Whistleblower involvement is associated with $90.16 to $92.88 million greater firm penalties than if no whistleblower was involved.
Fines assessed against executives and other employees averaged $50.22 to $56.50 million more than if no whistleblower was involved.
When whistleblowers are associated with an enforcement action, executives and employees at targeted firms are sentenced to prison on average 21.86 to 27.02 months longer than if no whistleblower was involved.
Cases involving a whistleblower continued for about 10 months (10.7%) longer than actions in which no whistleblower was involved.
The odds of a firm facing an enforcement action are 5.76 times greater among firms with prior whistleblower complaints.
As we have previously discussed on the Scarinci Hollenbeck business blog, whistleblower claims have also increased in recent years, in large part due to government programs that provide financial awards to whistleblowers who provide original information that leads to a successful enforcement action resulting in monetary sanctions. For instance, the SEC recently announced that it awarded $35 million to nine tipsters in FY 2014.
To help ensure that you are not on the receiving end of costly and time consuming enforcement action, it is imperative to have effective internal policies and procedures that encourage employees to address their concerns in-house rather than reporting them directly to the federal government.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
![By Ben Salter from Wales (Whistle blower Uploaded by Oxyman) [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fres.cloudinary.com%2Fscarinci-hollenbeck%2Fimages%2Ff_auto%2Cq_auto%2Fv1676548394%2Fwp.scarincihollenbeck%2Fwhistle-blowers%2Fwhistle-blowers.png%3F_i%3DAA%20755w%2C%20https%3A%2F%2Fres.cloudinary.com%2Fscarinci-hollenbeck%2Fimages%2Fw_300%2Ch_147%2Cc_scale%2Ff_auto%2Cq_auto%2Fv1676548394%2Fwp.scarincihollenbeck%2Fwhistle-blowers%2Fwhistle-blowers.png%3F_i%3DAA%20300w%2C%20https%3A%2F%2Fres.cloudinary.com%2Fscarinci-hollenbeck%2Fimages%2Fw_714%2Ch_350%2Cc_scale%2Ff_auto%2Cq_auto%2Fv1676548394%2Fwp.scarincihollenbeck%2Fwhistle-blowers%2Fwhistle-blowers.png%3F_i%3DAA%20714w&w=1920&q=90)
![By Ben Salter from Wales (Whistle blower Uploaded by Oxyman) [CC-BY-2.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0)], via Wikimedia Commons](https://res.cloudinary.com/scarinci-hollenbeck/images/f_auto,q_auto/v1676548394/wp.scarincihollenbeck/whistle-blowers/whistle-blowers.png?_i=AA 755w, https://res.cloudinary.com/scarinci-hollenbeck/images/w_300,h_147,c_scale/f_auto,q_auto/v1676548394/wp.scarincihollenbeck/whistle-blowers/whistle-blowers.png?_i=AA 300w, https://res.cloudinary.com/scarinci-hollenbeck/images/w_714,h_350,c_scale/f_auto,q_auto/v1676548394/wp.scarincihollenbeck/whistle-blowers/whistle-blowers.png?_i=AA 714w)