New Study Supports New Jersey’s New Initiative to Develop Areas Around its Public Transit Stations
A new study supports New Jersey’s new initiative to develop areas around its public transit stations. It found that neighborhoods located within a half-mile of public transit service locations outperformed areas farther from public transit based on a number of factors, such as property sales volume and price and rents.
The report, published by the American Public Transportation Association and the National Association of Realtors®, examined seven metropolitan regions – Boston, MA; Eugene, OR; Hartford, CT; Los Angeles, CA; Minneapolis-St. Paul, MN; Phoenix, AZ; and Seattle, WA — that provide access to heavy rail, light rail, commuter rail and bus rapid transit. It found that residential and commercial property sales near transit stations significantly outperformed areas without public transit access between 2012 and 2016 in all six regions.
“Public transit’s benefits go beyond moving people from point A to point B,” said APTA President and CEO Paul P. Skoutelas. “Public transportation is a valuable investment in our communities, our businesses, and our country. Public transportation gets people to jobs and educational opportunities and helps businesses attract employees and customers.”
Relationship between Real Estate Value and Public Transportation
The APTA/NAR study evaluated the seven metropolitan areas for residential and commercial sales performance, rent, neighborhood characteristics, local government interventions and housing affordability. Below are several key findings:
Between 2012 and 2016, median sales price increases near stations were 4 to 24 percentage points higher for residential properties than in areas farther from public transit. More than 43,500 occupied-units were added near transit in this time period across the seven regions.
Commercial property values also experienced gains in the studied cities. While data availability limited the office property analysis to five regions, four of them saw median sales price per square foot increase between 5 and 42 percentage points more in transit-proximate areas when compared with areas farther from public transit.
An increase in residential rents within transit sheds has encouraged developers. Increases in rents were between 2 and 14 percentage points higher in the public transit station area than in neighborhoods located farther away from transit.
Residents of transit-oriented neighborhoods have greater access to jobs via transit; own fewer cars; and live in dense, walkable areas, resulting in lower transportation costs. In the seven regions, one in four households in transit areas does not own a vehicle. On average, a household spends between $2,500 and $4,400 less per year on transportation.
Key Takeaway for New Jersey Developers
The study confirms that, when choosing where to live, Americans increasingly value proximity to public transportation, along with the ability to conveniently access retail shops, restaurants, and other commercial amenities. At the same time, businesses are recognizing that locating near public transit can greatly assist in attracting quality employees and customers. These trends are all good news for transit-oriented developments.
In New Jersey, the Murphy Administration’s new initiative to spur redevelopment around transit stations is also welcome news. To capitalize on the opportunities, we encourage developers to partner with an experienced attorney who can walk you through the process.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Don Pepe, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
This article is a part of a series covering New Jersey’s new initiative to redevelop areas near public transit centers. Additional installments from the series are listed below:
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?
Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore
Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers
Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?
IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next
When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court.
Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal
circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
