Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 5, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comOn the heels of newly passed state-wide regulations, New York City recently enacted the Stop Sexual Harassment in NYC Act (Act), which imposes additional requirements on top of the New York State laws. Most notably, employers must conduct annual sexual harassment training and display an anti-sexual harassment poster in common areas of the workplace.

The Act mandates that all private employers with 15 or more employees conduct annual anti-sexual harassment training for all employees, including supervisors and managerial employees. The sexual harassment training is also required within 90 days of initial hire for employees who work more than 80 hours in a calendar year on either a full-time or part-time basis. For new employees who received anti-sexual harassment training at a previous employer within the required training cycle, additional anti-sexual harassment training at the new employer would not be required until the next cycle. In addition, employers that are subject to sexual harassment training requirements in multiple jurisdictions may prove compliance with the Act by submitting proof that it provides all workers with annual interactive anti-sexual harassment training that satisfies the training standards set forth in the Act.
Under the Act, the annual sexual harassment training must include, but need not be limited to, the following:
Under the Act, the term “interactive training” means participatory teaching whereby the trainee is engaged in a trainer-trainee interaction, use of audio-visuals, computer or online training program or other participatory forms of training as determined by the commission. However, such “interactive training” is not required to be live or facilitated by an in-person instructor. The New York City Commission on Human Rights, in order to help New York City employers comply with the new training requirement, is tasked with creating an online interactive training module, which will be posted on its website for access by employers.
Employers must keep records of the training completed by each employee for at least three years, including a signed employee acknowledgment. The new requirement takes effect on April 1, 2019.
The Stop Sexual Harassment in NYC Act directs the New York City Commission on Human Rights to design an anti-sexual harassment rights and responsibilities poster and post it online for employers to access. All NYC employers will be required to display such poster in a conspicuous location where employees gather, such as break rooms and common areas. Every employer at a minimum must display the poster in English and in Spanish.
The Act also mandates distribution of an information sheet on sexual harassment to employees at the time of hire. The sheet will also be created by the New York City Commission on Human Rights. This part of the Act takes effect 120 days after May 9, 2018, the date that it was signed by Mayor de Blasio, provided that the Commission takes all actions needed for its implementation.
The Act also amends the New York City Human Rights Law, with regard specifically to sexual harassment, to apply to all employers, regardless of the number of employees. In addition, it extended the statute of limitations for filing gender-based harassment claims under the city human rights law from one year to three years. These amendments took place immediately.
For New York City employers, tasking affirmative steps to achieve anti-sexual harassment compliance, should be a top priority. With new state and local regulations, the compliance burdens and liability risks are growing. To stay on top of all your obligations, we encourage you to contact one of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s experienced employment attorneys.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Gary Young, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!