Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: February 26, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comSocial media allows New Jersey businesses to cost-effectively tout their products and services and build their brands. Facebook alone has around 1.37 billion active users worldwide every single day.

Of course, when interacting with the public, there are also opportunities for things to go wrong. Once information is posted online by an employee, it is virtually impossible to take back. In some cases, businesses may face lawsuits for their social media activities. Potential claims include libel and slander, and infringement of copyrights and trademarks.
While social media snafus clearly raise public relations concerns, they may also involve complex legal issues. For instance, statements perceived as inaccurate or unfair about products or services could lead to a competitor’s or consumer’s lawsuit, class action, or FCC investigation. Similarly, posting a defamatory statement that is thought to hurt someone’s professional reputation, e.g. a statement about a competitor, could result in a libel suit requiring defense even if the statement is true.
Posting content someone else believes they own can give rise to allegations of trademark or copyright infringement. In addition, the use and collection of customer or private information through interactions on social media may run afoul of state and federal privacy laws as well as case law. Social media posts can also inadvertently disclose your business’ own confidential or proprietary information.
To manage these social media risks, businesses should have a robust social media policy in place that advises employees about what company-related information can and cannot be posted via social media accounts. Employees that are authorized to post on behalf of the company should also be thoroughly trained to verify the veracity of anything that is posted or shared and to be aware of potential legal issues that may arise.
Given that mistakes can still happen, businesses may assess whether insurance coverage will be available in the event of a social media related claim. Most businesses have general liability coverage. However, it is important when considering coverage to evaluate the level of “advertising injury coverage” that is available in policies at both the primary and umbrella levels. Policies can cover certain harms to another company or individual’s reputation, copyright infringement, libel, or slander. For companies with extensive social media activity, it is appropriate to evaluate the need for an umbrella policy or other specialized endorsements that may fill gaps above a self-insured retention, adding coverage above or beyond the limits of the primary coverage.
Businesses may also want to consider stand-alone media liability coverage. While once reserved for publishers, broadcast companies, and other entities in the media industry, the proliferation of social media has created demand, and insurers are marketing these insurance policies to a wider range of businesses. Businesses may be able to tailor their policies to meet their specific needs and risks. Generally, policies should include coverage for additional types of claims arising out of intellectual property infringement; violations of rights of publicity; invasion of privacy; and allegations of defamation, libel, slander, and product disparagement.
As with any insurance decision regarding your business, it is helpful to review the options with experienced brokers and attorneys who can help you assess your potential liability, as well as to assist in your understanding of the available coverages.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Charles Yuen, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!