In Response To Recent Equifax Breach, SHIELD Act Has Been Proposed in New York
The massive Equifax data breach continues to spur regulatory reforms. New York, which already has one of the country’s strongest cybersecurity regulations for financial services institutions, is considering additional data protection measures. Of particular interest to businesses in New Jersey and elsewhere, the proposed data breach notification requirements would apply to entities operating outside New York.
As discussed in prior articles, the Equifax breach reportedly disclosed the personal information of 145.5 million Americans. The credit reporting company has also come under fire for failing to promptly notify consumers and regulators about the breach. In New York alone, eight million residents were impacted.
In response to the Equifax breach, New YorkGov. Andrew Cuomo proposed regulations that would subject consumer credit reporting agencies to the state’s recently enacted cybersecurity regulations for financial companies. Most recently, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced The Stop Hacks and Improve Electronic Data Security Act (SHIELD Act). The proposed bill broadens the scope of information covered under the state’s existing data breach notification law and updates the notification requirements when there has been a breach of data.
Data Breach Requirements Under SHIELD Act
In support of the new requirements, Schneiderman noted that existing regulations only apply to personally identifying information that includes social security numbers. “It’s clear that New York’s data security laws are weak and outdated. The SHIELD Act would help ensure these hacks never happen in the first place. It’s time for Albany to act, so that no more New Yorkers are needlessly victimized by weak data security measures and criminal hackers who are constantly on the prowl,” said Attorney General Schneiderman in a press statement announcing the SHIELD Act.
Under the proposed bill, businesses would be required to adopt “reasonable administrative, technical and physical protections for data.” Small businesses, defined as those with fewer than 50 employees and less than $3 million in gross revenue; or less than $5 million in assets, would be deemed compliant if they “implement and maintain reasonable safeguards that are appropriate to the size and complexity of the small business to protect the security, confidentiality and integrity of the private information.”
The bill also contains a carve-out for certain other businesses. It provides that “certified compliant entities,” defined as those already regulated by, and compliant with, existing or future regulations of any federal or New York State government entity (including NYS DFS regulations; regulations under Gramm-Leach-Bliley; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) regulations, or with International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) cybersecurity standards, would receive safe harbor status from enforcement actions under the SHIELD Act.
Below are several other key components of the proposed SHIELD Act:
The scope of information subject to the current data breach notification law would be expanded to include biometric information, email addresses and their corresponding passwords or security questions and answers, and protected health information as defined under HIPAA.
The definition of a data breach would be expanded to include unauthorized access to private information.
Data breach notification requirements would apply to any person or entity with private information of a New York resident, not just to those that conduct business in New York State.
Failure to provide required, reasonable data security would be a violation of section 349 of the General Business Law, thereby authorizing the attorney general to file suit for noncompliance. Businesses could be fined $5,000 for each violation or up to $20 per instance of failed notification, provided that the latter’s aggregate amount does not exceed $250,000.
We will continue to monitor the SHIELD Act as it makes its way through the legislative process. It will be particularly interesting to see how the state plans to enforce the law against businesses that do not have operations in New York.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Proposed SHIELD Act Would Have Broad Reach
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
In Response To Recent Equifax Breach, SHIELD Act Has Been Proposed in New York
The massive Equifax data breach continues to spur regulatory reforms. New York, which already has one of the country’s strongest cybersecurity regulations for financial services institutions, is considering additional data protection measures. Of particular interest to businesses in New Jersey and elsewhere, the proposed data breach notification requirements would apply to entities operating outside New York.
As discussed in prior articles, the Equifax breach reportedly disclosed the personal information of 145.5 million Americans. The credit reporting company has also come under fire for failing to promptly notify consumers and regulators about the breach. In New York alone, eight million residents were impacted.
In response to the Equifax breach, New YorkGov. Andrew Cuomo proposed regulations that would subject consumer credit reporting agencies to the state’s recently enacted cybersecurity regulations for financial companies. Most recently, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman announced The Stop Hacks and Improve Electronic Data Security Act (SHIELD Act). The proposed bill broadens the scope of information covered under the state’s existing data breach notification law and updates the notification requirements when there has been a breach of data.
Data Breach Requirements Under SHIELD Act
In support of the new requirements, Schneiderman noted that existing regulations only apply to personally identifying information that includes social security numbers. “It’s clear that New York’s data security laws are weak and outdated. The SHIELD Act would help ensure these hacks never happen in the first place. It’s time for Albany to act, so that no more New Yorkers are needlessly victimized by weak data security measures and criminal hackers who are constantly on the prowl,” said Attorney General Schneiderman in a press statement announcing the SHIELD Act.
Under the proposed bill, businesses would be required to adopt “reasonable administrative, technical and physical protections for data.” Small businesses, defined as those with fewer than 50 employees and less than $3 million in gross revenue; or less than $5 million in assets, would be deemed compliant if they “implement and maintain reasonable safeguards that are appropriate to the size and complexity of the small business to protect the security, confidentiality and integrity of the private information.”
The bill also contains a carve-out for certain other businesses. It provides that “certified compliant entities,” defined as those already regulated by, and compliant with, existing or future regulations of any federal or New York State government entity (including NYS DFS regulations; regulations under Gramm-Leach-Bliley; Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) regulations, or with International Organization for Standardization (ISO)/National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) cybersecurity standards, would receive safe harbor status from enforcement actions under the SHIELD Act.
Below are several other key components of the proposed SHIELD Act:
The scope of information subject to the current data breach notification law would be expanded to include biometric information, email addresses and their corresponding passwords or security questions and answers, and protected health information as defined under HIPAA.
The definition of a data breach would be expanded to include unauthorized access to private information.
Data breach notification requirements would apply to any person or entity with private information of a New York resident, not just to those that conduct business in New York State.
Failure to provide required, reasonable data security would be a violation of section 349 of the General Business Law, thereby authorizing the attorney general to file suit for noncompliance. Businesses could be fined $5,000 for each violation or up to $20 per instance of failed notification, provided that the latter’s aggregate amount does not exceed $250,000.
We will continue to monitor the SHIELD Act as it makes its way through the legislative process. It will be particularly interesting to see how the state plans to enforce the law against businesses that do not have operations in New York.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
