
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: April 11, 2024

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
On April 4, 2024, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voluntarily agreed to delay implementation of its new climate disclosure regulations to allow ongoing legal challenges to play out. Lawsuits challenging the SEC’s authority to mandate the climate disclosures have been consolidated before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals and will now proceed with the rules on hold.
As discussed in greater detail here, the SEC’s climate disclosure regulations, entitled The Enhancement and Standardization of Climate-Related Disclosures for Investors, require public companies to make new climate-related disclosures for investors in their registration statements and annual reports. Among other requirements, companies must disclose climate-related risks that have had or are reasonably likely to have a material impact on their business strategy, results of operations, or financial condition. Many companies must also disclose information about their direct and indirect greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.
The SEC rules have been controversial since first proposed in 2022. Following the publication of the Final Rules, more than ten lawsuits were filed, some alleging that the SEC has exceeded its authority and others arguing that the agency did not go far enough.
In response to the numerous legal challenges to the rules, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated the suits before the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals. Following the consolidation order, Liberty Energy Incorporated and Nomad Proppant Services LLC asked the appeals court to stay the rules pending resolution of the litigation. While the SEC initially opposed the stay, it has now agreed to voluntarily delay implementation. Under the Exchange Act and the Administrative Procedures Act (APA), the SEC “has discretion to stay its rules pending judicial review if it finds that ‘justice so requires.’”
In its Order, the SEC emphasized its commitment to the climate disclosure rules and vowed to continue defending them in court. “In issuing a stay, the Commission is not departing from its view that the Final Rules are consistent with applicable law and within the Commission’s long-standing authority to require the disclosure of information important to investors in making investment and voting decisions,” the SEC said.
Nonetheless, the SEC acknowledged that staying the rules will allow the litigation to proceed more smoothly and reduce regulatory uncertainty. “[G]iven the procedural complexities accompanying the consolidation and litigation of a large number of petitions for review of the Final Rules, a Commission stay will facilitate the orderly judicial resolution of those challenges and allow the court of appeals to focus on deciding the merits,” the SEC explained. “Further, a stay avoids potential regulatory uncertainty if registrants were to become subject to the Final Rules’ requirements during the pendency of the challenges to their validity.”
The Eight Circuit will now proceed with its judicial review of the SEC’s climate disclosure rules, which will likely take time. Although the rules are now on hold, companies should stay on top of legal developments. Should the regulations ultimately survive, companies will need to resume preparing to meet their disclosure obligations.
Additionally, the SEC’s stay does not mean that climate disclosures are entirely off the table. Investors continue to pressure companies to provide disclosures, and companies may be subject to other reporting requirements, including those established by the State of California and the European Union.
With a multidisciplinary team of experienced corporate, environmental, and securities attorneys, Scarinci Hollenbeck is ready to help companies navigate the ever-evolving legal landscape surrounding climate-related disclosures. We encourage companies to contact us with any questions about the SEC’s Final Rules, disclosure obligations under other regulatory regimes, or voluntary disclosures.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

No. An eviction does not automatically end a tenant’s obligation to pay rent. Post-eviction rent claims are common because recovering possession resolves who has the right to occupy the premises, but it does not extinguish the tenant’s contractual obligations under the lease. Whether unpaid or future rent remains owed depends on three factors: the lease’s […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

A company is dissolved; legally, it ceases to exist. Accordingly, dissolution results in significant legal and financial consequences. It is a process that must be properly managed to avoid continuing liability. The Corporate Dissolution Process Corporate dissolution is the legal process of formally closing a corporation, paying its debts and distributing the remaining assets. Most […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

A triple net lease is a commercial lease in which the tenant pays the property’s real estate taxes, insurance, and maintenance costs, known as the three nets, in addition to base rent. They are most often used in freestanding retail and office buildings and in large single-tenant industrial properties, with terms that typically run 10 […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Every lawsuit comes with a cost, and knowing when to settle a lawsuit is one of the most consequential decisions a business owner will face. Experienced litigators understand how to minimize cost and obtain certainty for their clients. For many business owners, the decision is viewed almost entirely through a financial lens: What will it cost […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Corporate litigation, also called commercial litigation or business litigation, is the formal legal process through which companies resolve disputes in the civil court system. When a business relationship breaks down and other resolution methods have failed, litigation provides a structured legal mechanism for asserting rights, recovering damages, enforcing obligations, and obtaining court-ordered relief. Unlike criminal […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!