Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Hedging Policy Disclosure Rule Proposed By SEC
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: February 19, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently proposed new rules that require enhanced corporate disclosure of hedging policies for officers, directors, and employees.
Mandated under Section 955 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the proposed rules would specifically require disclosure about whether directors, officers and other employees are permitted to hedging or offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities granted by the company as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by employees or directors.
Many New York and New Jersey corporations likely already have hedging policies in place that either prohibit such transactions or require prior authorization. The proposed SEC rules do not mandate that all companies incorporate specific corporate governance policies, but rather impose new disclosure obligations with regard to existing hedging policies.
Under Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K, corporations must already disclose policies that address hedging by named executive officers. Section 955 of the Dodd-Frank Act directs the SEC to require, by rule, each issuer to disclose whether any employee or member of the board of directors is permitted to purchase financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities either (1) granted to the employee or director by the issuer as part of the compensation of the employee or director; or (2) held, directly or indirectly, by the employee or director.
In fulfilling this mandate, the SEC proposes the following:
- Disclosure as to hedging would be required in a proxy statement or information statement relating to an election of directors, whether by vote of security holders at a meeting or an action authorized by written consent.
- The equity securities that must be disclosed would include equity securities of the company, any parent of the company, any subsidiary of the company or any subsidiary of any parent of the company that are registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
- If the issuer allows some, but not all, of its employees and directors to engage in hedging transactions, the company must disclose which categories of persons are permitted to hedge and which categories of persons are not. Similarly, the company must disclose which categories of transactions it permits and which categories of transactions it prohibits.
- The term “employee” would be interpreted to include everyone employed by an issuer, including its officers.
- The disclosure obligation would apply to companies subject to the federal proxy rules, including smaller reporting companies, emerging growth companies, business development companies, and registered closed-end investment companies with shares listed and registered on a national securities exchange.
Public comments on the proposed SEC rule must be received on or before April 20, 2015.
- Business attorney New Jersey
- Business attorney NYC
- NJ attorney Scarinci
- Scarinci Hollenbeck
- Securities attorney NYC
- Locations: Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ, New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Hedging Policy Disclosure Rule Proposed By SEC
Author: Dan Brecher
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently proposed new rules that require enhanced corporate disclosure of hedging policies for officers, directors, and employees.
Mandated under Section 955 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the proposed rules would specifically require disclosure about whether directors, officers and other employees are permitted to hedging or offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities granted by the company as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by employees or directors.
Many New York and New Jersey corporations likely already have hedging policies in place that either prohibit such transactions or require prior authorization. The proposed SEC rules do not mandate that all companies incorporate specific corporate governance policies, but rather impose new disclosure obligations with regard to existing hedging policies.
Under Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K, corporations must already disclose policies that address hedging by named executive officers. Section 955 of the Dodd-Frank Act directs the SEC to require, by rule, each issuer to disclose whether any employee or member of the board of directors is permitted to purchase financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities either (1) granted to the employee or director by the issuer as part of the compensation of the employee or director; or (2) held, directly or indirectly, by the employee or director.
In fulfilling this mandate, the SEC proposes the following:
- Disclosure as to hedging would be required in a proxy statement or information statement relating to an election of directors, whether by vote of security holders at a meeting or an action authorized by written consent.
- The equity securities that must be disclosed would include equity securities of the company, any parent of the company, any subsidiary of the company or any subsidiary of any parent of the company that are registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
- If the issuer allows some, but not all, of its employees and directors to engage in hedging transactions, the company must disclose which categories of persons are permitted to hedge and which categories of persons are not. Similarly, the company must disclose which categories of transactions it permits and which categories of transactions it prohibits.
- The term “employee” would be interpreted to include everyone employed by an issuer, including its officers.
- The disclosure obligation would apply to companies subject to the federal proxy rules, including smaller reporting companies, emerging growth companies, business development companies, and registered closed-end investment companies with shares listed and registered on a national securities exchange.
Public comments on the proposed SEC rule must be received on or before April 20, 2015.