Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Hedging Policy Disclosure Rule Proposed By SEC

Author: Dan Brecher

Date: February 19, 2015

Key Contacts

Back

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently proposed new rules that require enhanced corporate disclosure of hedging policies for officers, directors, and employees.

Mandated under Section 955 of the Dodd-Frank Act, the proposed rules would specifically require disclosure about whether directors, officers and other employees are permitted to hedging or offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities granted by the company as compensation or held, directly or indirectly, by employees or directors.

Many New York and New Jersey corporations likely already have hedging policies in place that either prohibit such transactions or require prior authorization. The proposed SEC rules do not mandate that all companies incorporate specific corporate governance policies, but rather impose new disclosure obligations with regard to existing hedging policies.

Under Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K, corporations must already disclose policies that address hedging by named executive officers. Section 955 of the Dodd-Frank Act directs the SEC to require, by rule, each issuer to disclose whether any employee or member of the board of directors is permitted to purchase financial instruments (including prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds) that are designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of equity securities either (1) granted to the employee or director by the issuer as part of the compensation of the employee or director; or (2) held, directly or indirectly, by the employee or director.

In fulfilling this mandate, the SEC proposes the following:

  • Disclosure as to hedging would be required in a proxy statement or information statement relating to an election of directors, whether by vote of security holders at a meeting or an action authorized by written consent.
  • The equity securities that must be disclosed would include equity securities of the company, any parent of the company, any subsidiary of the company or any subsidiary of any parent of the company that are registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.
  • If the issuer allows some, but not all, of its employees and directors to engage in hedging transactions, the company must disclose which categories of persons are permitted to hedge and which categories of persons are not. Similarly, the company must disclose which categories of transactions it permits and which categories of transactions it prohibits.
  • The term “employee” would be interpreted to include everyone employed by an issuer, including its officers.
  • The disclosure obligation would apply to companies subject to the federal proxy rules, including smaller reporting companies, emerging growth companies, business development companies, and registered closed-end investment companies with shares listed and registered on a national securities exchange.

Public comments on the proposed SEC rule must be received on or before April 20, 2015.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress post image

Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress

Director and officer liability increases sharply when a company is in financial distress. Decisions that would draw little attention in a healthy business can later be challenged by creditors, shareholders, bankruptcy trustees, and regulators as breaches of fiduciary duty, fraudulent transfers, or oversight failures. Understanding where that exposure comes from, and how to manage it, […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "Navigating Director and Officer Liability in Times of Financial Distress"
Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey post image

Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey

For developers pursuing battery energy storage system (BESS) projects, finding the right property is only the beginning. BESS site selection is as much a legal and transactional exercise as a real estate decision, with risk analysis central to the project’s ultimate success. Key Takeaways The core questions for BESS site selection in New York and […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "Before You Buy: Managing Real Estate and Permitting Risk for BESS Projects in New York and New Jersey"
What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney post image

What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "What Business Owners Get Wrong Before Meeting a Litigation Attorney"
Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract post image

Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]

Author: Graham Staton

Link to post with title - "Arbitration vs. Litigation vs. Mediation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Know Before Signing a Contract"
Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement? post image

Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "Can You Own Part of a New Jersey Business Without a Written Agreement?"
Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One post image

Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Crisis-Proofing Your New Jersey Business: Building a Crisis Response Plan Before You Need One"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!