To Allow a Larger Number of Companies to Undertake Securities Offerings in Reliance on the Revamped Regulation A, Additional Changes are Forthcoming
Three years after being overhauled, issuers are beginning to take advantage of Regulation A with greater frequency. However, it still remains one of the lesser-used capital-raising tools. One reason for this is that only a few brokerage firms are presently underwriting Regulation A offerings.
To allow a larger number of companies to undertake securities offerings in reliance on the revamped Regulation A, additional changes are forthcoming. Under the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act (Act), which President Donald Trump signed into law on May 24, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) must again revise Regulation A+, this time to allow public companies to use it to offer securities.
Prior Amendments to Regulation A+
Regulation A allows certain issuers to raise capital without going through the costly process of conducting a registered public offering or complying with the accredited investor and/or solicitation restrictions associated with Rule 506(b) or 506(c) private placements under Regulation D. Issuers are also authorized to gauge investor interest by “testing the waters.”
Despite these benefits, Regulation A remains one of the most infrequently used exemptions to SEC registration. Prior amendments to Regulation A, dubbed “Regulation A+,” now allow smaller companies to offer and sell up to $50 million of securities in a 12-month period. Enacted as part of the JOBS Act, the changes aimed to make the exemption more widely available and to provide small businesses with greater access to capital.
Regulation A+ includes two tiers of securities offerings, each with its separate set of requirements. Tier 1 covers securities offerings of up to $20 million in a 12-month period, with not more than $6 million in offers by selling security-holders that are affiliates of the issuer. Meanwhile, Tier 2 includes securities offerings of up to $50 million in a 12-month period, with not more than $15 million in offers by selling security-holders that are affiliates of the issuer.
Notably, Tier 1 still requires the approval from state securities regulators, whereas the rules provide for the preemption of state securities law registration and qualification requirements for Tier 2 securities. In addition to the basic requirements set forth in Regulation A, companies conducting Tier 2 offerings are subject to other requirements. For instance, they are required to provide audited financial statements and file annual, semiannual and current event reports with the SEC. In addition, securities purchases for non-accredited investors are limited to no more than 10 percent of the greater of the investor’s annual income or net worth.
Expansion of Regulation A+
Under the Act, the SEC will again expand the reach of Regulation A. The exemption currently excludes public reporting companies, which means that they must generally rely on fully registered public offerings to raise capital. To increase the number of companies that can take advantage of Regulation A, the Act specifically eliminates the requirement that an issuer not be subject to certain reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, immediately before an offering.
Because Regulation A offers a streamlined and less costly SEC review process, the new changes are welcome news for companies seeking to raise capital. For companies conducting Tier 2 offerings, the exemption also allows companies to bypass state blue sky review. Under the Act, the periodic reports filed by public reporting companies would be deemed to meet the reporting and disclosure requirements under a Tier 2 offering.
The latest changes do not take effect immediately. Rather, the Act requires the SEC to enact amendments to Regulation A to implement its provisions. We expect to see an increased number of brokerage firms underwriting Regulation A offerings when the new changes take effect. We will continue to track the process of the regulatory changes and post updates as they become available.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work at 201-806-3364.
Real Estate Litigation Explained: Top 5 Disputes and How to Avoid Them
The five most common real estate disputes are breach of contract claims, landlord-tenant conflicts, zoning and land use disagreements, construction claims, and boundary disputes. Understanding why each arises, and taking preventive steps early, can help property owners, tenants, developers, and investors avoid costly litigation. Key Takeaways: Real estate transactions are complex endeavors involving numerous parties […]
When a Child Turns 18: The Gap in Your Family’s Estate Plan
Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Business Mediation: An Overview and Practical Tips
Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Top 5 Causes Leading to Construction Defect Litigation
The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
How to Protect Your New Jersey Business When Going through a Divorce
The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
