Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: October 17, 2023
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
The FINRA expungement process allows brokers, financial advisors, and other registered financial professionals to clear their names in response to unfounded or inaccurate allegations. Because the process can be challenging to navigate, particularly in light of recent amendments to FINRA’s expungement rules, it is advisable to work with an experienced FINRA expungement attorney.
When customers file complaints with FINRA, they are entered into its Central Registration Depository (CRD), which is the central licensing and registration system used by U.S. securities regulators and financial firms. Information from the CRD system is made available to the public through FINRA’s BrokerCheck website.
Customer dispute information, which may include customer complaints, arbitration claims, arbitration awards, and court judgments, is disclosed regardless of whether it has been determined that the broker has committed any wrongdoing. Accordingly, even if FINRA arbitrators conclude that a complaint lacks merit, it remains in FINRA BrokerCheck unless the broker successfully seeks expungement.
According to FINRA, expungement is an “extraordinary remedy” to be used only in limited cases. It requires a court order directing expungement or an order confirming an arbitration award containing expungement before it will expunge customer dispute information from the CRD system.
Financial professionals may make an arbitration request during an ongoing customer arbitration or as a “straight-in request.” A straight-in request expungement is a separate arbitration claim devoted exclusively to expungement and is often filed after the settlement of a customer-initiated arbitration or where a customer complaint does not result in a customer-initiated arbitration.
FINRA Rules 12805 and 13805 outline the narrow circumstances in which the expungement of customer dispute information from the CRD system is appropriate. To obtain an award containing expungement relief through the FINRA Dispute Resolution Services (DRS) arbitration forum, the arbitrator(s) must unanimously find that the party requesting expungement has established one of the following:
Effective October 16, 2023, FINRA amended the Codes of Arbitration Procedure (Codes) to modify the process for requesting expungement of customer dispute information in the DRS arbitration forum. Several of the changes make the expungement of customer disputes more challenging. These amendments include the following:
The FINRA amendments also make several changes to how “straight in” requests are handled. This includes the imposition of strict deadlines for filing requests. Financial professionals seeking expungement must now file their request within two years of the close of the customer litigation or arbitration linked to the customer dispute. Alternatively, they can do so within three years after the date the customer complaint was reported on the CRD system.
FINRA will also randomly select a panel of arbitrators to decide the expungement request. Parties are not permitted to agree to fewer than three arbitrators. Parties are also not permitted to strike any arbitrators selected by FINRA’s list selection algorithm or stipulate their removal.
The amended rules for straight-in requests introduce a mechanism for state securities regulators to attend and participate in expungement hearings. They can do so either in person or through video conference. Even if they are not a party to the hearing.
Successfully navigating the FINRA expungement process can make or break your career. With such high stakes, you need an experienced legal team in your corner. At Scarinci Hollenbeck, our attorneys have extensive experience handling expungement requests. We work tirelessly to protect your legal interests and your reputation. If you are facing a false or inaccurate customer complaint, we encourage you to contact one of our FINRA defense attorneys today.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!