
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: August 20, 2013

Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comRailroad company Montreal, Maine & Atlantic Ltd., which has recently been in the media spotlight for causing a deadly explosion in Quebec, is seeking bankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 in both the United States and Canada.
Earlier in July, a parked train carrying 72 tankers full of crude oil began rolling downtown in the small Quebec town of Lac-Megantic and eventually derailed, causing a fire and explosion that killed 47 people. Since the deadly explosion, the company has experienced significant service delays and disruptions that has indebted it to more than 200 creditors, the company said in its bankruptcy filing.
In addition, the railroad company, which is based in Maine, said that costly lawsuits and clean-up costs associated with the fatal explosion have only exacerbated its financial difficulties. The company also noted that in the one month following the disaster, its monthly revenue for its Canadian and U.S. units fell to $1 million.
The company sought protection in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Maine, as well as in Canada, noting that filing in both countries would help preserve the value of its assets for a potential sale, Reuters reports.
“It has become apparent that the obligations of both companies now exceed the value of their assets, including prospective insurance recoveries, as a direct result of the tragic derailment at Lac-Megantic,Quebec, on July 6,” MMA Chairman Ed Burkhardt said in a statement.
Despite the company’s financial instability and bankruptcy filing, Canadian authorities say they will push to ensure that the railroad company meets its obligations to the town that was impacted by the explosion.
“This announcement does not mean that MM&A is off the hook for their responsibilities to the people of Lac-Megantic,” Ashley Kelahear, a spokeswoman for Canadian Transport Minister Lisa Raitt, said in an email to Bloomberg. “We will work with the Province of Quebec to ensure that the cleanup continues and that the people of Lac-Megantic continue to receive the support they need.”
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!