
John D. Giampolo
Partner
212-390-8486 jgiampolo@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: John D. Giampolo
Date: September 3, 2026

Partner
212-390-8486 jgiampolo@sh-law.com
When a company enters Chapter 11 bankruptcy, many assume the process will culminate in a lengthy reorganization plan. However, distressed businesses are increasingly being sold through a different mechanism — a sale under Section 363 of the United States Bankruptcy Code.
A Section 363 sale allows a company, as a debtor-in-possession in bankruptcy, to sell its assets outside the ordinary course of business free and clear of liens, claims and encumbrances, subject to bankruptcy court approval but outside the restrictions of a confirmed Chapter 11 plan. These transactions have become a common material component of Chapter 11 bankruptcy cases because they can often be completed more quickly than a traditional Chapter 11 reorganization plan.
For business owners, lenders, investors, and prospective purchasers, understanding how Section 363 sales work can help identify opportunities and avoid costly surprises.
Section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code authorizes a debtor-in-possession or trustee to sell property of the bankruptcy estate free and clear of liens, claims, and encumbrances outside the ordinary course of business and outside of a confirmed reorganization plan. While ordinary business transactions can generally continue without court approval, the sale of significant assets outside the ordinary course requires notice to creditors and approval from the bankruptcy court.
The assets being sold may include:
In some cases, substantially all of a debtor’s assets are sold through a Section 363 process, effectively transferring the business, free and clear of liens, claims, and encumbrances, to a new owner while the bankruptcy case continues. In some cases, the business is transferred to the same owner, who acquires it free and clear of creditor claims through a special-purpose vehicle, provided the buyer’s insider status is disclosed and and no higher or better offers are received. Other requirements are met for bankruptcy court approval.
The principal advantage of a Section 363 sale to the debtor company selling its assets is speed. A traditional Chapter 11 reorganization often requires extensive negotiations, disclosure statements, creditor voting, and confirmation hearings. By contrast, a Section 363 sale can often be completed in as little as two months or so after the bankruptcy filing, allowing the debtor to preserve going-concern value and reduce administrative expenses.
For a distressed company, time is often the most valuable asset. Customers, employees, vendors, and financing sources may become increasingly uncertain as a bankruptcy case drags on. A prompt sale can help stabilize operations and maximize recoveries for creditors.
The principal advantage of a Section 363 sale to the buyer is the ability to acquire the debtor company’s assets free and clear. One of the most significant features of a Section 363 sale is the ability to transfer assets “free and clear” of many existing liens, claims, and encumbrances, often to a greater extent than can be accomplished through a state court foreclosure, assignment for the benefit of creditors, or other insolvency proceedings. This benefit is often a major driver of buyer interest because it can substantially reduce the risk of acquiring troubled assets.
Under Section 363(f), the bankruptcy court may authorize a sale that removes certain interests from the assets being transferred, with those interests instead attaching to the sale proceeds. As a result, purchasers often receive cleaner title than they might obtain in an out-of-court distressed transaction or other insolvency proceeding.
Of course, “free and clear” does not mean “risk free.” Buyers must still conduct careful due diligence and understand which liabilities may survive the transaction under applicable law.
Although every case is different, most Section 363 sales follow a similar framework. Below is a summary of the key steps in the process:
Section 363 sales can present attractive acquisition opportunities, particularly for strategic purchasers and private equity investors. Potential advantages include:
Nonetheless, buyers should not assume that bankruptcy eliminates every risk. Due diligence remains critical, particularly regarding regulatory obligations, tax issues, employment matters, intellectual property rights, and potential successor liability concerns.
Secured creditors often play a central role in Section 363 sales. In many cases, a lender’s collateral constitutes the assets being sold. Secured creditors may support a sale, object to proposed procedures, negotiate sale terms, or exercise the right to “credit bid” their debt in the auction process. Credit bidding can provide a powerful tool for protecting collateral value and influencing the outcome of a sale. Lenders should closely monitor the sale process to ensure that asset values are maximized and lien rights are adequately protected.
Whether you are a distressed business evaluating strategic alternatives, a lender protecting collateral, or a purchaser considering a bankruptcy acquisition, Section 363 sales involve a complex intersection of bankruptcy law, corporate transactions, finance, and litigation. The decisions made at the outset of a sale process can significantly affect valuation, bidding rights, contract assignments, and post-closing liability exposure. Experienced counsel can help stakeholders navigate these issues while positioning them to achieve the best possible outcome.
Section 363 sales often move quickly and carry substantial legal and financial consequences for all parties. John D. Giampolo, a Partner in Scarinci Hollenbeck’s New York City and Red Bank offices, and the firm’s bankruptcy attorneys regularly advise businesses, lenders, buyers, various creditors, investors, and other stakeholders on bankruptcy-related transactions, distressed acquisitions, and restructuring matters throughout New Jersey and the New York metropolitan area, as well as in connection with bankruptcies in Delaware, California, and throughout the U.S.
If your company is considering a bankruptcy asset sale or evaluating opportunities arising from a distressed transaction, Mr. Giampolo and our team can help you assess risks, protect your interests, and navigate the process from start to finish. Contact us today.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

For battery energy storage system (BESS) developers, securing equipment and site control is only part of the development equation. A project must also connect to the electric grid, and increasingly, BESS interconnection is one of the biggest sources of schedule, cost, and contractual risk. Key Takeaways This article is Part 3 of our Battery Storage […]
Author: Nicholas Wall
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!