Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Proposed SEC Clawback Rules to Cut Out Erroneous Compensation
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: July 14, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
Earlier this month, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed new rules that would require companies to adopt policies that require executive officers to pay back incentive-based compensation that they were awarded erroneously.
These SEC clawback rules for executive compensation, which are required under Section 954 of the Dodd Frank Act, are intended to improve the quality of financial reporting and provide enhanced accountability to investors.
“These listing standards will require executive officers to return incentive-based compensation that was not earned,” said SEC Chair Mary Jo White. “The proposed rules would result in increased accountability and greater focus on the quality of financial reporting, which will benefit investors and the markets.”
Key provisions of the rules
The rule proposal is more than 100 pages, which does not make for light reading. Below is a brief summary of several key provisions of Proposed Rule 10D-1 under the Securities Exchange Act:
- Listing standards: The proposed rule mandates that national securities exchanges and associations establish listing standards that require companies to adopt recovery policies that, in the event of an accounting restatement, “claw back” incentive-based compensation from current and former executive officers that they would not have received based on the restatement.
- Definition of executive officer: The rule’s definition of “executive officer” includes the company’s president, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, any vice-president in charge of a principal business unit, division or function, and any other person who performs policy-making functions for the company.
- Applicability: The listing standards would apply to incentive-based compensation that is linked to accounting-related metrics, stock price or total shareholder return. Recovery would apply to excess incentive-based compensation received by executive officers in the three fiscal years preceding the date a listed company is required to prepare an accounting restatement. In addition, recovery would be required without regard to fault.
- Disclosures: Each listed company would be required to file its recovery policy as an exhibit to its annual report under the Securities Exchange Act. In addition, a listed company would be required to disclose its actions to recover in its annual reports and any proxy statement that requires executive compensation disclosure if, during its last fiscal year, a restatement requiring recovery of excess incentive-based compensation was completed, or there was an outstanding balance of excess incentive-based compensation from a prior restatement.
- Timelines: Under the proposed rule, the exchanges would be required to file their proposed listing rules no later than 90 days following the publication of the adopted version of Rule 10D-1 in the Federal Register. In addition, the listing rules must become effective no later than one year following the publication date. Listed companies would subsequently be required to adopt recovery policies no later than 60 days following the date on which the listing exchange’s listing rule becomes effective.
- Violations: Companies would be subject to delisting if they fail to adopt a compensation recovery policy, disclose the policy in accordance with SEC’s rules, or comply with the policy’s recovery provisions.
The proposed SEC clawback rules are now available for public comment and may undergo substantial changes before they are finalized. However, businesses should begin to review any corporate documents that may be impacted by the new requirements, including company bylaws, articles, executive compensation agreements, and directors and officers insurance policies.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Proposed SEC Clawback Rules to Cut Out Erroneous Compensation
Author: Dan Brecher
Earlier this month, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) proposed new rules that would require companies to adopt policies that require executive officers to pay back incentive-based compensation that they were awarded erroneously.
These SEC clawback rules for executive compensation, which are required under Section 954 of the Dodd Frank Act, are intended to improve the quality of financial reporting and provide enhanced accountability to investors.
“These listing standards will require executive officers to return incentive-based compensation that was not earned,” said SEC Chair Mary Jo White. “The proposed rules would result in increased accountability and greater focus on the quality of financial reporting, which will benefit investors and the markets.”
Key provisions of the rules
The rule proposal is more than 100 pages, which does not make for light reading. Below is a brief summary of several key provisions of Proposed Rule 10D-1 under the Securities Exchange Act:
- Listing standards: The proposed rule mandates that national securities exchanges and associations establish listing standards that require companies to adopt recovery policies that, in the event of an accounting restatement, “claw back” incentive-based compensation from current and former executive officers that they would not have received based on the restatement.
- Definition of executive officer: The rule’s definition of “executive officer” includes the company’s president, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer, any vice-president in charge of a principal business unit, division or function, and any other person who performs policy-making functions for the company.
- Applicability: The listing standards would apply to incentive-based compensation that is linked to accounting-related metrics, stock price or total shareholder return. Recovery would apply to excess incentive-based compensation received by executive officers in the three fiscal years preceding the date a listed company is required to prepare an accounting restatement. In addition, recovery would be required without regard to fault.
- Disclosures: Each listed company would be required to file its recovery policy as an exhibit to its annual report under the Securities Exchange Act. In addition, a listed company would be required to disclose its actions to recover in its annual reports and any proxy statement that requires executive compensation disclosure if, during its last fiscal year, a restatement requiring recovery of excess incentive-based compensation was completed, or there was an outstanding balance of excess incentive-based compensation from a prior restatement.
- Timelines: Under the proposed rule, the exchanges would be required to file their proposed listing rules no later than 90 days following the publication of the adopted version of Rule 10D-1 in the Federal Register. In addition, the listing rules must become effective no later than one year following the publication date. Listed companies would subsequently be required to adopt recovery policies no later than 60 days following the date on which the listing exchange’s listing rule becomes effective.
- Violations: Companies would be subject to delisting if they fail to adopt a compensation recovery policy, disclose the policy in accordance with SEC’s rules, or comply with the policy’s recovery provisions.
The proposed SEC clawback rules are now available for public comment and may undergo substantial changes before they are finalized. However, businesses should begin to review any corporate documents that may be impacted by the new requirements, including company bylaws, articles, executive compensation agreements, and directors and officers insurance policies.