Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: July 7, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
On April 16, 2015, the NYC City Council passed the law that will prohibit pre-employment credit checks, “Stop Credit Discrimination in Employment Act”. The new law will become effective 120 days after being signed into law by Mayor Bill de Blasio.
The anti pre-employment credit checks law, which applies to businesses with four or more employees, would amend the New York City’s Human Rights Law to make it an unlawful discriminatory practice for an employer to use an individual’s consumer credit history in making employment decisions. As with other violations of the law, workers would be able to pursue a private cause of action.
The broad employment law defines “consumer credit history” as “information bearing on an individual’s credit worthiness, credit standing, or credit capacity, including, but not limited to, an individual’s credit score, credit account and other consumer account balances, and payment history.” Information about prior bankruptcies, judgments, or liens and details regarding the number of credit accounts, late or missed payments, charged-off debts, items in collections, credit limit or prior credit report inquiries is also off limits.
In addition to banning the use of consumer credit histories in the hiring process, the law also makes it illegal to consider such information when making decisions regarding “compensation, or the terms, conditions or privileges of employment.”
The NYC employment law does include several notable exceptions from pre-employment credit checks , which were added to the law in its final stages. For instance, it does not apply to employers required by state or federal law or regulation, or by a self-regulatory organization, to use consumer credit history for employment purposes.
In addition, the following are also exempted from pre-employment credit checks :
The Stop Credit Discrimination in Employment Act reflects the growing trend of restricting the use of consumer credit checks to screen potential job candidates. California, Maryland, Connecticut, Hawaii, Illinois, Washington, Oregon, Vermont, Colorado and Nevada already have similar measures in place. Accordingly, it is imperative for employers to review their policies and procedures to maintain compliance in this rapidly evolving legal landscape.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Jorge R. de Armas or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Operating a business in the New Jersey and New York City metropolitan region offers incredible opportunities, but it also requires navigating a dense and highly regulated legal environment. From entity formation to regulatory compliance, seemingly minor legal oversights can expose business owners to significant risk. In our work with businesses throughout the region, our attorneys […]
Author: Dan Brecher

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!