
Fred D. Zemel
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comNon-practicing entities do not directly use the patents they own to produce goods, but rather license them to other companies that do. These firms have drawn the ire of the business community because they often collect patent rights solely to opportunistically extract licensing fees. According to a recent study by Boston University, litigation by patent trolls continues to rise dramatically. Researchers determined that these lawsuits cost tech companies more than $29.2 billion in 2001, compared to $6.7 billion in 2005.

To combat patent trolls and their increasingly aggressive litigation tactics, Congress is now considering at least different seven bills. Proposed solutions include requiring the loser in a patent infringement lawsuit to pay all of the litigation costs and attorney’s fees as well as mandating greater transparency in patent ownership.
The White House also announced a series of executive actions and seven legislative recommendations intended to improve the quality of high-tech patents and cut down on frivolous litigation. In the statement accompanying the proposals, President Obama specifically addressed patent trolls, which he stated “don’t actually produce anything themselves,” and instead develop a business model “to essentially leverage and hijack somebody else’s idea and see if they can extort some money out of them.”
The FTC is also concerned that patent trolls may cause competitive harm. The agency will launch an extensive investigation into patent assertion entities, according to Chairwoman Edith Ramirez. Particular areas of concern include “privateering,” where one company transfers patents to a non-practicing entity for the purpose of suing competitors for infringement, and the practice of strong arming small businesses in an attempt to induce the payment of illegitimate licensing fees.
Seeking to capitalize on the growing support for anti-patent troll legislation, U.S. businesses have also stepped up pressure on Congress. Over 50 businesses, including big names like American Bankers Association, the Motion Picture Association of America, and the National Retail Federation, recently sent a letter to leaders in both the House and the Senate urging swift action.
“The undersigned organizations strongly encourage Congressional efforts to address abuses of the legal system by certain patent assertion entities, commonly referred to as patent trolls. Managing frivolous patent suits unfortunately has become an expensive distraction for a large cross section of American businesses. Instead of focusing on innovation, job creation, and economic growth, we are forced to deal with legal games that have serious consequences,” the letter states.
If you have any questions about the patent legislation or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Fred Zemel, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Before buying property, it is critical to determine whether local zoning laws may affect your plans. If you plan to redevelop the property, you will want to confirm that local zoning regulations permit development as intended. If acquiring property that is already developed, you must verify that the use is permitted in the underlying zoning […]
Author: Wendy Rubinstein Quiroga

For parents of a child with a disability, estate planning raises concerns that go well beyond deciding who will inherit their assets. Parents may spend years making sure their child has the right care, services, and support. Eventually, they must also confront a difficult question: Who will take over when they can no longer do […]
Author: George McGowan

Before buying a New Jersey rental property, an investor should verify realistic operating numbers, the property’s legal and regulatory status, lead-based paint and flood compliance, the existing leases and tenant protections, and the right ownership structure. A rental property is more than a piece of real estate; it is an operating business subject to legal, […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

In New Jersey, an irrevocable trust can sometimes be modified even though its name suggests otherwise, and one of the primary tools for doing so is a process called decanting. Whether decanting is available depends on the specific terms of the trust and the discretion given to the trustee. Key takeaways: New Jersey has no […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Intellectual property valuation determines the monetary value of a business’s IP assets, and it drives outcomes in licensing deals, joint ventures, mergers and acquisitions, financing, and ownership disputes. The most valuable assets of a business are often the things that cannot be seen or touched: a proprietary process, a copyrighted work, brand recognition, or the […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

For New Jersey data center owners and operators, a service agreement may look routine when it is signed. The network is functioning, the vendor is meeting its installation schedule, and the parties have agreed on pricing and performance specifications. The provisions that seem most important at that stage are often the technical ones. That changes […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!