
Fred D. Zemel
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comNon-practicing entities do not directly use the patents they own to produce goods, but rather license them to other companies that do. These firms have drawn the ire of the business community because they often collect patent rights solely to opportunistically extract licensing fees. According to a recent study by Boston University, litigation by patent trolls continues to rise dramatically. Researchers determined that these lawsuits cost tech companies more than $29.2 billion in 2001, compared to $6.7 billion in 2005.

To combat patent trolls and their increasingly aggressive litigation tactics, Congress is now considering at least different seven bills. Proposed solutions include requiring the loser in a patent infringement lawsuit to pay all of the litigation costs and attorney’s fees as well as mandating greater transparency in patent ownership.
The White House also announced a series of executive actions and seven legislative recommendations intended to improve the quality of high-tech patents and cut down on frivolous litigation. In the statement accompanying the proposals, President Obama specifically addressed patent trolls, which he stated “don’t actually produce anything themselves,” and instead develop a business model “to essentially leverage and hijack somebody else’s idea and see if they can extort some money out of them.”
The FTC is also concerned that patent trolls may cause competitive harm. The agency will launch an extensive investigation into patent assertion entities, according to Chairwoman Edith Ramirez. Particular areas of concern include “privateering,” where one company transfers patents to a non-practicing entity for the purpose of suing competitors for infringement, and the practice of strong arming small businesses in an attempt to induce the payment of illegitimate licensing fees.
Seeking to capitalize on the growing support for anti-patent troll legislation, U.S. businesses have also stepped up pressure on Congress. Over 50 businesses, including big names like American Bankers Association, the Motion Picture Association of America, and the National Retail Federation, recently sent a letter to leaders in both the House and the Senate urging swift action.
“The undersigned organizations strongly encourage Congressional efforts to address abuses of the legal system by certain patent assertion entities, commonly referred to as patent trolls. Managing frivolous patent suits unfortunately has become an expensive distraction for a large cross section of American businesses. Instead of focusing on innovation, job creation, and economic growth, we are forced to deal with legal games that have serious consequences,” the letter states.
If you have any questions about the patent legislation or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Fred Zemel, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

What should you expect when meeting a litigation attorney about a business dispute? You should expect to describe the dispute in your own words, hand over the most important documents, flag any deadlines or immediate threats, and leave with a clearer picture of the problem, what information is still needed, and the likely next steps. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

Arbitration resolves disputes privately before an arbitrator whose decision is usually final, while litigation resolves them in court with full rights of appeal. Whether a business ends up in arbitration or litigation is often decided when it signs the contract, long before any dispute arises. Key Takeaways When facing a contract dispute, carefully consider your […]
Author: Graham Staton

Can you own part of a business in New Jersey without a written agreement? Yes, it is possible. Under New Jersey’s Uniform Partnership Act, a partnership can arise when two or more people carry on a business as co-owners for profit, whether or not they ever intended to form one. Ownership doesn’t necessarily depend on […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

For New Jersey businesses, crisis preparedness should be viewed as a legal and operational function, not simply an emergency-management exercise. A well-designed crisis response plan can help preserve evidence, protect confidential communications, meet reporting obligations, limit unnecessary exposure, and prevent an already difficult situation from becoming a larger legal problem. Key Takeaways A serious crisis […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Monmouth County is entering a significant new phase of development. For those looking to acquire property or undertake a new project, understanding the market opportunity is only the beginning. The more important question is whether a particular property can actually be developed as contemplated and what approvals, agreements, and other conditions will be required to […]
Author: Donald M. Pepe

Whether a client’s prompts to a generative AI tool and the documents it produces are protected from disclosure depends on the case type, who claims protection, and whether counsel was involved. In United States v. Heppner, a New York federal judge ruled that a criminal defendant’s communications with an AI platform were protected by neither […]
Author: Chris Seelinger
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!