
Fred D. Zemel
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7065 fzemel@sh-law.comNon-practicing entities do not directly use the patents they own to produce goods, but rather license them to other companies that do. These firms have drawn the ire of the business community because they often collect patent rights solely to opportunistically extract licensing fees. According to a recent study by Boston University, litigation by patent trolls continues to rise dramatically. Researchers determined that these lawsuits cost tech companies more than $29.2 billion in 2001, compared to $6.7 billion in 2005.

To combat patent trolls and their increasingly aggressive litigation tactics, Congress is now considering at least different seven bills. Proposed solutions include requiring the loser in a patent infringement lawsuit to pay all of the litigation costs and attorney’s fees as well as mandating greater transparency in patent ownership.
The White House also announced a series of executive actions and seven legislative recommendations intended to improve the quality of high-tech patents and cut down on frivolous litigation. In the statement accompanying the proposals, President Obama specifically addressed patent trolls, which he stated “don’t actually produce anything themselves,” and instead develop a business model “to essentially leverage and hijack somebody else’s idea and see if they can extort some money out of them.”
The FTC is also concerned that patent trolls may cause competitive harm. The agency will launch an extensive investigation into patent assertion entities, according to Chairwoman Edith Ramirez. Particular areas of concern include “privateering,” where one company transfers patents to a non-practicing entity for the purpose of suing competitors for infringement, and the practice of strong arming small businesses in an attempt to induce the payment of illegitimate licensing fees.
Seeking to capitalize on the growing support for anti-patent troll legislation, U.S. businesses have also stepped up pressure on Congress. Over 50 businesses, including big names like American Bankers Association, the Motion Picture Association of America, and the National Retail Federation, recently sent a letter to leaders in both the House and the Senate urging swift action.
“The undersigned organizations strongly encourage Congressional efforts to address abuses of the legal system by certain patent assertion entities, commonly referred to as patent trolls. Managing frivolous patent suits unfortunately has become an expensive distraction for a large cross section of American businesses. Instead of focusing on innovation, job creation, and economic growth, we are forced to deal with legal games that have serious consequences,” the letter states.
If you have any questions about the patent legislation or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Fred Zemel, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Every lawsuit comes with a cost, and knowing when to settle a lawsuit is one of the most consequential decisions a business owner will face. Experienced litigators understand how to minimize cost and obtain certainty for their clients. For many business owners, the decision is viewed almost entirely through a financial lens: What will it cost […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]
Author: John D. Giampolo

For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Author: George McGowan

As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
Author: George McGowan
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!