The Redskins franchise has, for some time, been embroiled in a two-pronged battle to defend its name, both legally and in the public eye. The term “redskin” has been deemed offensive to Native Americans by many, even though the Washington football team has explained that the name is meant to honor Native Americans, rather than disparage them. Regardless of the Redskins’ insistence that the team’s name represents a positive portrayal of Native Americans, backlash against it has persisted and the organization hasn’t fared much better in courtrooms.
On July, 8, 2015, a federal judge ruled to cancel the team’s trademark registration, because the Redskins name was deemed offensive to Native Americans. The legal reasoning for the cancelation all goes back to the Lanham Act, which is the main federal trademark statute of law in the United States. The section of the Lanham Act pertaining to trademark registration cancelations and rejections, §1052, was used in the attempt to cancel the Redskins trademark.
What the Lanham Act has to say about disparaging trademarks
This section of the act notes that any trademark that “comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter” or “may disparage” certain individuals may be refused registration. This isn’t the only reason a trademark may be rejected, but it was good enough to lead a judge to cancel the Redskins’ trademark. The Washington football team is one of a number of sports organizations whose names reference Native Americans, and it remains to be seen whether “redskin” is the only one of those words deemed disparaging by the court.
It also isn’t the only reason a trademark registration may be refused. Sports teams’ and other organizations’ trademark registrations may be refused for a number of reasons. For example, if they contain the flag, coat of arms or any other insignia of the U.S., if they include the “name, portrait or signature” of any living person without his or her consent and if they consist of, or contain a mark that has already been registered.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Offensive Trademarks May Not Last for Long
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The NFL’s Washington Redskins recently had a taste of how fragile a trademark can be, especially if there are grounds for cancellation.
The team will likely appeal the decision, but questions arise: Can they win? When and why are federal judges allowed to cancel offensive trademarks?
The Redskins franchise has, for some time, been embroiled in a two-pronged battle to defend its name, both legally and in the public eye. The term “redskin” has been deemed offensive to Native Americans by many, even though the Washington football team has explained that the name is meant to honor Native Americans, rather than disparage them. Regardless of the Redskins’ insistence that the team’s name represents a positive portrayal of Native Americans, backlash against it has persisted and the organization hasn’t fared much better in courtrooms.
On July, 8, 2015, a federal judge ruled to cancel the team’s trademark registration, because the Redskins name was deemed offensive to Native Americans. The legal reasoning for the cancelation all goes back to the Lanham Act, which is the main federal trademark statute of law in the United States. The section of the Lanham Act pertaining to trademark registration cancelations and rejections, §1052, was used in the attempt to cancel the Redskins trademark.
What the Lanham Act has to say about disparaging trademarks
This section of the act notes that any trademark that “comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter” or “may disparage” certain individuals may be refused registration. This isn’t the only reason a trademark may be rejected, but it was good enough to lead a judge to cancel the Redskins’ trademark. The Washington football team is one of a number of sports organizations whose names reference Native Americans, and it remains to be seen whether “redskin” is the only one of those words deemed disparaging by the court.
It also isn’t the only reason a trademark registration may be refused. Sports teams’ and other organizations’ trademark registrations may be refused for a number of reasons. For example, if they contain the flag, coat of arms or any other insignia of the U.S., if they include the “name, portrait or signature” of any living person without his or her consent and if they consist of, or contain a mark that has already been registered.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
