The Redskins franchise has, for some time, been embroiled in a two-pronged battle to defend its name, both legally and in the public eye. The term “redskin” has been deemed offensive to Native Americans by many, even though the Washington football team has explained that the name is meant to honor Native Americans, rather than disparage them. Regardless of the Redskins’ insistence that the team’s name represents a positive portrayal of Native Americans, backlash against it has persisted and the organization hasn’t fared much better in courtrooms.
On July, 8, 2015, a federal judge ruled to cancel the team’s trademark registration, because the Redskins name was deemed offensive to Native Americans. The legal reasoning for the cancelation all goes back to the Lanham Act, which is the main federal trademark statute of law in the United States. The section of the Lanham Act pertaining to trademark registration cancelations and rejections, §1052, was used in the attempt to cancel the Redskins trademark.
What the Lanham Act has to say about disparaging trademarks
This section of the act notes that any trademark that “comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter” or “may disparage” certain individuals may be refused registration. This isn’t the only reason a trademark may be rejected, but it was good enough to lead a judge to cancel the Redskins’ trademark. The Washington football team is one of a number of sports organizations whose names reference Native Americans, and it remains to be seen whether “redskin” is the only one of those words deemed disparaging by the court.
It also isn’t the only reason a trademark registration may be refused. Sports teams’ and other organizations’ trademark registrations may be refused for a number of reasons. For example, if they contain the flag, coat of arms or any other insignia of the U.S., if they include the “name, portrait or signature” of any living person without his or her consent and if they consist of, or contain a mark that has already been registered.
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
