Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 27, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe New York City Council recently passed several measures intended it to make it easier for mothers to express breast milk during the workday. Most notably, the bills require New York City employers to provide designated lactation rooms and establish a workplace lactation accommodation policy regarding the use of such rooms.

Existing federal and state laws already address these issues. Under Section 7 of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), employers must provide reasonable break times for workers to express breast milk for up to one year following a child’s birth. Employers are also required to provide a place, other than a bathroom, that is shielded from view and free from intrusion from coworkers and the public, for the employee to express breast milk.
Employers with fewer than 50 employees are not subject to the FLSA breastfeeding requirements. However, the federal law does not preempt State and local governments from providing greater protections to employees. New Jersey already imposes such requirements on employers. Amendments to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (NJLAD) further provide that it is a civil rights violation for a working woman to be fired or otherwise discriminated against because of breastfeeding or expressing her milk during breaks.
New York was the first state in the nation to pass a civil rights law that protects a mother’s right to breastfeed in public. New York’s labor law also grants rights to breastfeeding mothers. Current New York law requires employers to provide reasonable, unpaid break times or permits employees to use paid break or meal times to express breast milk for up to three years from the birth of the child. Employers must make reasonable efforts to provide a room or other location, in close proximity to the work area, where an employee can express milk in privacy.
The New York City Council recently passed legislation imposing additional obligations on New York City employers. Under Intro. 879-A, employers with 15 or more employees must provide lactation rooms, as well as refrigerators, in reasonable proximity to work areas for the purposes of expressing and storing breast milk. Under the bill, the term “lactation room” means a sanitary place, other than a restroom, that can be used to express breast milk, shielded from view and free from intrusion, and that includes at minimum an electrical outlet, a chair, a surface on which to place a breast pump and other personal items, and nearby access to running water.
Intro. 879-A further provides that if the room designated by the employer to serve as a lactation room is also used for another purpose, the sole function of the room must be as a lactation room while an employee is using it to express breast milk. In addition, if providing a lactation room poses an undue hardship on the employer, the employer must engage in a “cooperative dialogue” with the employee regarding other options that may be available.
The second bill, Intro. 905-A, requires employers to implement a Lactation Room Accommodation Policy, which must be distributed to all employees upon hiring. The policy must include a statement that employees have a right to request a lactation room and identify a process by which employees may request a lactation room. Under the bill, this process must:
Intro. 905-A also directs the City Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) to establish and make available a model lactation accommodation policy for employers to use.
If signed by Mayor Bill DiBlasio, the bills would take effect 120 days from the date of the mayor’s signature. Given the likelihood that the new requirements will become law, NYC employers should begin considering their compliance obligations, such as where to locate a lactation room. For compliance concerns, we encourage you to contact a member of the Labor & Employment Law Group at Scarinci Hollenbeck.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!