In Town of Copake v. New York State Office of Renewable Energy Siting, the New York State Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit challenging regulations aimed to streamline and expedite the siting of major renewable energy projects…
In Town of Copake v. New York State Office of Renewable Energy Siting, the New York State Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit challenging regulations aimed to streamline and expedite the siting of major renewable energy projects. According to the court, the New York Office of Renewable Energy Siting (ORES) acted within its authority under the Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act when establishing the new regulatory framework.
Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act
In April 2020, New York enacted the Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act (Act). Among other changes, the law consolidated the environmental review of major renewable energy facilities in a newly established agency, ORES. The new law is designed to streamline the permit process and help the state accelerate progress towards its clean energy and climate goals, including the mandate to obtain 70 percent of the state’s electricity from renewable sources.
The siting of large utility-scale renewable energy generation facilities was previously subject to review and approval under New York State Public Service Law Article 10. The former process required significant public involvement, which ultimately proved time-consuming and unworkable, with few projects obtaining final approval.
Under the Act, all large-scale, renewable energy projects larger than 25 megawatts are now required to seek an approved permit through ORES for new construction or expansion. Projects already in the initial phases of the current Article 10 siting process through the State’s Siting Board may remain in Article 10 or opt-in to the new siting process. New projects sized between 20 and 25 megawatts are able to opt-in to the ORES review process.
If deemed complete, applications for a permit through ORES will be acted upon within one year; projects proposed on certain previously developed commercial and industrial sites will be acted upon within six months. If ORES does not make a determination within the required timeframe, the draft permit will be deemed approved and a permit granted.
The Act provides opportunities for communities and local governments to provide input during the ORES review process. Below are several key provisions:
No application can be deemed complete without proof of consultation with the host community regarding procedural and substantive requirements of applicable local laws.
Municipalities must be notified upon the publishing of an application’s draft permit conditions and must provide feedback on the draft permit conditions and the proposed facility’s compliance with local laws within the subsequent 60-day public comment period. ORES is required to consider any applicable local law when making a determination.
If host community statements raise any substantive and significant issues that require adjudication, ORES may establish a date for an adjudicatory hearing. If substantive or significant issues are raised and the Siting Office does not hold an adjudicatory hearing, a public hearing will be scheduled in the host community.
The Public Service Commission will hold a proceeding to determine how best to provide communities with a compensatory benefit for hosting a major renewable facility, such as a discount or credit on utility bills.
Local government agencies and community intervenors have access to funds ($1,000/MW), administered by NYSERDA and distributed pursuant to regulations and at the direction of the Executive Director of ORES.
As a condition for approval, permits must include a provision requiring host community benefits.
Lawsuit Challenging ORES Renewable Energy Siting Regulations
To carry out its new oversight authority, the Act required ORES to promulgate regulations within one year of its effective date. On September 16, 2020, the Office of Renewable Energy Siting issued draft regulations and uniform standards and conditions for public comment pursuant to the State Administrative Procedure Act (SAPA). The regulations, Chapter XVIII, Title 19 of NYCRR Part 900 (Subparts 900-1 – 900-15), became effective on March 3, 2021.
On June 29, 2021, several municipalities and public interest groups filed suit, challenging the ORES regulations. The suit alleged that the ORES regulations were procedurally defective; ran afoul of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SQRA) and the State Administrative Procedures Act (SAPA); exceeded the statutory authority granted under New York State Executive Law; and violated the Home Rule Provisions of the New York State Constitution.
On October 8, 2021, Justice Peter Lynch of the New York State Supreme Court dismissed the suit. In reaching his decision, Judge Lynch found that ORES did take the requisite “hard look” at the potential environmental impacts of the regulations. In support, he noted that ORES identified relevant areas of environmental concern, analyzed them, and adequately supported its conclusion that the regulations wouldn’t lead to any significant adverse environmental impacts. With regard to the alleged SAPA violations, the court noted that ORES conducted several public hearings, as required under the Act. As Judge Lynch wrote, “Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the regulations seek and provide a full opportunity for public input.”
Judge Lynch also emphasized that the lawsuit challenged the adoption of the ORES regulations and not their application. “If ORES violates the regulations during any project review, such violation is subject to judicial review beyond the scope of this proceeding,” he wrote.
Key Takeaway
The Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act and its implementing regulation have significantly changed New York’s process for approving the siting of renewable energy projects. The court’s decision in Town of Copake v. New York State Office of Renewable Energy Sitingallows New York’s new regulatory framework to continue and provides greater legal certainty for entities involved in such projects.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Monica Schroeck, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
New York’s New Renewable Energy Siting Regulation Survives Legal Challenge
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
In Town of Copake v. New York State Office of Renewable Energy Siting, the New York State Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit challenging regulations aimed to streamline and expedite the siting of major renewable energy projects…
In Town of Copake v. New York State Office of Renewable Energy Siting, the New York State Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit challenging regulations aimed to streamline and expedite the siting of major renewable energy projects. According to the court, the New York Office of Renewable Energy Siting (ORES) acted within its authority under the Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act when establishing the new regulatory framework.
Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act
In April 2020, New York enacted the Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act (Act). Among other changes, the law consolidated the environmental review of major renewable energy facilities in a newly established agency, ORES. The new law is designed to streamline the permit process and help the state accelerate progress towards its clean energy and climate goals, including the mandate to obtain 70 percent of the state’s electricity from renewable sources.
The siting of large utility-scale renewable energy generation facilities was previously subject to review and approval under New York State Public Service Law Article 10. The former process required significant public involvement, which ultimately proved time-consuming and unworkable, with few projects obtaining final approval.
Under the Act, all large-scale, renewable energy projects larger than 25 megawatts are now required to seek an approved permit through ORES for new construction or expansion. Projects already in the initial phases of the current Article 10 siting process through the State’s Siting Board may remain in Article 10 or opt-in to the new siting process. New projects sized between 20 and 25 megawatts are able to opt-in to the ORES review process.
If deemed complete, applications for a permit through ORES will be acted upon within one year; projects proposed on certain previously developed commercial and industrial sites will be acted upon within six months. If ORES does not make a determination within the required timeframe, the draft permit will be deemed approved and a permit granted.
The Act provides opportunities for communities and local governments to provide input during the ORES review process. Below are several key provisions:
No application can be deemed complete without proof of consultation with the host community regarding procedural and substantive requirements of applicable local laws.
Municipalities must be notified upon the publishing of an application’s draft permit conditions and must provide feedback on the draft permit conditions and the proposed facility’s compliance with local laws within the subsequent 60-day public comment period. ORES is required to consider any applicable local law when making a determination.
If host community statements raise any substantive and significant issues that require adjudication, ORES may establish a date for an adjudicatory hearing. If substantive or significant issues are raised and the Siting Office does not hold an adjudicatory hearing, a public hearing will be scheduled in the host community.
The Public Service Commission will hold a proceeding to determine how best to provide communities with a compensatory benefit for hosting a major renewable facility, such as a discount or credit on utility bills.
Local government agencies and community intervenors have access to funds ($1,000/MW), administered by NYSERDA and distributed pursuant to regulations and at the direction of the Executive Director of ORES.
As a condition for approval, permits must include a provision requiring host community benefits.
Lawsuit Challenging ORES Renewable Energy Siting Regulations
To carry out its new oversight authority, the Act required ORES to promulgate regulations within one year of its effective date. On September 16, 2020, the Office of Renewable Energy Siting issued draft regulations and uniform standards and conditions for public comment pursuant to the State Administrative Procedure Act (SAPA). The regulations, Chapter XVIII, Title 19 of NYCRR Part 900 (Subparts 900-1 – 900-15), became effective on March 3, 2021.
On June 29, 2021, several municipalities and public interest groups filed suit, challenging the ORES regulations. The suit alleged that the ORES regulations were procedurally defective; ran afoul of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SQRA) and the State Administrative Procedures Act (SAPA); exceeded the statutory authority granted under New York State Executive Law; and violated the Home Rule Provisions of the New York State Constitution.
On October 8, 2021, Justice Peter Lynch of the New York State Supreme Court dismissed the suit. In reaching his decision, Judge Lynch found that ORES did take the requisite “hard look” at the potential environmental impacts of the regulations. In support, he noted that ORES identified relevant areas of environmental concern, analyzed them, and adequately supported its conclusion that the regulations wouldn’t lead to any significant adverse environmental impacts. With regard to the alleged SAPA violations, the court noted that ORES conducted several public hearings, as required under the Act. As Judge Lynch wrote, “Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the regulations seek and provide a full opportunity for public input.”
Judge Lynch also emphasized that the lawsuit challenged the adoption of the ORES regulations and not their application. “If ORES violates the regulations during any project review, such violation is subject to judicial review beyond the scope of this proceeding,” he wrote.
Key Takeaway
The Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act and its implementing regulation have significantly changed New York’s process for approving the siting of renewable energy projects. The court’s decision in Town of Copake v. New York State Office of Renewable Energy Sitingallows New York’s new regulatory framework to continue and provides greater legal certainty for entities involved in such projects.
If you have questions, please contact us
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Monica Schroeck, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
