Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 17, 2021
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIn Town of Copake v. New York State Office of Renewable Energy Siting, the New York State Supreme Court rejected a lawsuit challenging regulations aimed to streamline and expedite the siting of major renewable energy projects. According to the court, the New York Office of Renewable Energy Siting (ORES) acted within its authority under the Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act when establishing the new regulatory framework.
In April 2020, New York enacted the Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act. Among other changes, the law consolidated the environmental review of major renewable energy facilities in a newly established agency, ORES. The new law is designed to streamline the permit process and help the state accelerate progress towards its clean energy and climate goals, including the mandate to obtain 70 percent of the state’s electricity from renewable sources.
The siting of large utility-scale renewable energy generation facilities was previously subject to review and approval under New York State Public Service Law Article 10. The former process required significant public involvement, which ultimately proved time-consuming and unworkable, with few projects obtaining final approval.
Under the Act, all large-scale, renewable energy projects larger than 25 megawatts are now required to seek an approved permit through ORES for new construction or expansion. Projects already in the initial phases of the current Article 10 siting process through the State’s Siting Board may remain in Article 10 or opt-in to the new siting process. New projects sized between 20 and 25 megawatts are able to opt-in to the ORES review process.
If deemed complete, applications for a permit through ORES will be acted upon within one year; projects proposed on certain previously developed commercial and industrial sites will be acted upon within six months. If ORES does not make a determination within the required timeframe, the draft permit will be deemed approved and a permit granted.
The Act provides opportunities for communities and local governments to provide input during the ORES review process. Below are several key provisions:
To carry out its new oversight authority, the Act required ORES to promulgate regulations within one year of its effective date. On September 16, 2020, the Office of Renewable Energy Siting issued draft regulations and uniform standards and conditions for public comment pursuant to the State Administrative Procedure Act (SAPA). The regulations, Chapter XVIII, Title 19 of NYCRR Part 900 (Subparts 900-1 – 900-15), became effective on March 3, 2021.
On June 29, 2021, several municipalities and public interest groups filed suit, challenging the ORES regulations. The suit alleged that the ORES regulations were procedurally defective; ran afoul of the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SQRA) and the State Administrative Procedures Act (SAPA); exceeded the statutory authority granted under New York State Executive Law; and violated the Home Rule Provisions of the New York State Constitution.
On October 8, 2021, Justice Peter Lynch of the New York State Supreme Court dismissed the suit. In reaching his decision, Judge Lynch found that ORES did take the requisite “hard look” at the potential environmental impacts of the regulations. In support, he noted that ORES identified relevant areas of environmental concern, analyzed them, and adequately supported its conclusion that the regulations wouldn’t lead to any significant adverse environmental impacts. With regard to the alleged SAPA violations, the court noted that ORES conducted several public hearings, as required under the Act. As Judge Lynch wrote, “Contrary to petitioner’s claim, the regulations seek and provide a full opportunity for public input.”
Judge Lynch also emphasized that the lawsuit challenged the adoption of the ORES regulations and not their application. “If ORES violates the regulations during any project review, such violation is subject to judicial review beyond the scope of this proceeding,” he wrote.
The Accelerated Renewable Energy Growth and Community Benefit Act and its implementing regulation have significantly changed New York’s process for approving the siting of renewable energy projects. The court’s decision in Town of Copake v. New York State Office of Renewable Energy Siting allows New York’s new regulatory framework to continue and provides greater legal certainty for entities involved in such projects.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Monica Schroeck, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!