
Daniel T. McKillop
Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Daniel T. McKillop
Date: July 9, 2021

Partner
201-896-7115 dmckillop@sh-law.com
The New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) recently issued a compliance advisory (Advisory) directed to New Jersey Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES) permit holders who submit discharge monitoring reports. The Advisory warns that the NJDEP is prioritizing enforcement against significant non-compliant dischargers.
The New Jersey Water Pollution Control Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq., is implemented by regulations at N.J.A.C. 7:14-2.1 et seq. The regulations define a “Significant noncomplier” (SNC) as any person, except a local agency for an exceedance of an effluent limitation for flow, who commits any of the following violations:
As set forth in the Advisory, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has established the reduction of significant non-compliance as a National Compliance Initiative. The NJDEP has also made it one of its own priorities, and the advisory is designed to help NJPDES permittees achieve or maintain compliance and avoid potential enforcement and penalties. “If you own or operate a facility with a permit issued under the NJPDES program, including a state-issued permit under the New Jersey Water Pollution Control Act, you have an obligation to comply with the effluent limits, reporting requirements, and other requirements in the permit,” the Advisory states. “Non-compliance may subject you to substantial penalties through enforcement actions.”
The Advisory NJPDES advises permittees to assess their compliance status in the following ways:
We encourage impacted entities to review the Advisory and take any applicable recommendations provided by the NJDEP. For additional compliance assistance, we encourage working with an experienced New Jersey environmental attorney.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!