Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
NJ Superior Court Refuses Inheritance Tax Appeal of Domestic Partnership
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: November 27, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
NJ Supreme Court denies inheritance tax appeal
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently decided not to hear the appeal case filed by the federal pension beneficiary of a domestic partnership couple. According to a Law 360 report, Claudette A. Lugano was denied state inheritance tax exemption as a domestic partner because the Court ruled that she did not meet the requirements of the exemption in accordance with New Jersey state law.
Lugano’s argument for the state’s inheritance tax exemption
In Lugano v. Director, Division of Taxation, Lugano argued to the court that she was entitled to receive exemption from the state’s inheritance tax because she was a recognized domestic partner. According to a report a New Jersey firm specializing in elder law, Lugano’s point was that she had lived with her domestic partner for eight years. Her partner was also a federal employee, and thus the couple was required to file a form with the federal government to designate their relationship. After Lugano and her partner filed that form with the federal government, they were under the assumption that they had fulfilled the New Jersey requirements to designate their relationship as domestic partners.
The NJ court decides not to hear the appeal
After the initial case, the New Jersey Tax Court ruled that Lugano and her partner had not, in fact, filed the necessary forms required under the state Domestic Partnership Act. Therefore, the court held that Lugano would be required to pay the state’s inheritance tax as a Class D beneficiary of her domestic partner’s federal pension benefits.
The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey then used this decision as the basis for declining to hear the appeal case. In its decision to throw out the appeal, the court asserted that the Tax Court was accurate in its decision that Lugano does not qualify for the inheritance tax exemption due to the fact that the couple did not fill out all the necessary forms, including an affidavit for domestic partnership within New Jersey.
Lugano had assumed that a domestic partnership declaration submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank should be sufficient to receive the tax exemption. However, the Superior Court ruled that this was only sufficient to be classified as a common law or de facto marriage, which was rejected by the state legislature for inheritance tax exemption. In turn, the Court also ruled that the New Jersey law is not applicable for federal pensions.
The ramifications
As a result of the decision not to hear the appeal, Lugano will be forced to pay more than $100,000 to the state of New Jersey as a Class D beneficiary, which comes with a 15 percent tax on inheritance, according to Forbes contributor Peter J Reilly, a certified public accountant.
From a broader perspective with domestic partnership couples, it is important to note that individuals who filed as couples for tax purposes with their companies prior to the domestic partner law will need to file an affidavit for their relationships. Otherwise, the partnership will not be recognized.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
NJ Superior Court Refuses Inheritance Tax Appeal of Domestic Partnership
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
NJ Supreme Court denies inheritance tax appeal
The New Jersey Supreme Court recently decided not to hear the appeal case filed by the federal pension beneficiary of a domestic partnership couple. According to a Law 360 report, Claudette A. Lugano was denied state inheritance tax exemption as a domestic partner because the Court ruled that she did not meet the requirements of the exemption in accordance with New Jersey state law.
Lugano’s argument for the state’s inheritance tax exemption
In Lugano v. Director, Division of Taxation, Lugano argued to the court that she was entitled to receive exemption from the state’s inheritance tax because she was a recognized domestic partner. According to a report a New Jersey firm specializing in elder law, Lugano’s point was that she had lived with her domestic partner for eight years. Her partner was also a federal employee, and thus the couple was required to file a form with the federal government to designate their relationship. After Lugano and her partner filed that form with the federal government, they were under the assumption that they had fulfilled the New Jersey requirements to designate their relationship as domestic partners.
The NJ court decides not to hear the appeal
After the initial case, the New Jersey Tax Court ruled that Lugano and her partner had not, in fact, filed the necessary forms required under the state Domestic Partnership Act. Therefore, the court held that Lugano would be required to pay the state’s inheritance tax as a Class D beneficiary of her domestic partner’s federal pension benefits.
The Appellate Division of the Superior Court of New Jersey then used this decision as the basis for declining to hear the appeal case. In its decision to throw out the appeal, the court asserted that the Tax Court was accurate in its decision that Lugano does not qualify for the inheritance tax exemption due to the fact that the couple did not fill out all the necessary forms, including an affidavit for domestic partnership within New Jersey.
Lugano had assumed that a domestic partnership declaration submitted to the Federal Reserve Bank should be sufficient to receive the tax exemption. However, the Superior Court ruled that this was only sufficient to be classified as a common law or de facto marriage, which was rejected by the state legislature for inheritance tax exemption. In turn, the Court also ruled that the New Jersey law is not applicable for federal pensions.
The ramifications
As a result of the decision not to hear the appeal, Lugano will be forced to pay more than $100,000 to the state of New Jersey as a Class D beneficiary, which comes with a 15 percent tax on inheritance, according to Forbes contributor Peter J Reilly, a certified public accountant.
From a broader perspective with domestic partnership couples, it is important to note that individuals who filed as couples for tax purposes with their companies prior to the domestic partner law will need to file an affidavit for their relationships. Otherwise, the partnership will not be recognized.