Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLCScarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Firm Insights

Gov. Murphy Signs Bill Banning Single-Use Paper and Plastic Bags

Author: Daniel T. McKillop

Date: November 23, 2020

Key Contacts

Back

Gov. Phil Murphy recently signed Senate Bill 864 banning single-use paper and plastic bags

On November 4, 2020, Gov. Phil Murphy signed legislation (Senate Bill 864) banning single-use paper and plastic bags. Once New Jersey’s ban takes effect next May, it will be the strongest environmental law of its kind in the country.

Gov. Murphy Signs Bill Banning Single-Use Paper and Plastic Bags

“Plastic bags are one of the most problematic forms of garbage, leading to millions of discarded bags that stream annually into our landfills, rivers, and oceans,” Governor Murphy said in a press statement. “With today’s historic bill signing, we are addressing the problem of plastic pollution head-on with solutions that will help mitigate climate change and strengthen our environment for future generations.”  

Single-Use Plastic and Paper Bags

Starting May 2022, a store or food service business will be prohibited from providing or selling a single-use plastic carryout bag to a customer. In addition, a grocery store would be prohibited from providing or selling a single-use paper carryout bag to a customer.  The following, however, are exempt:

  • A bag used solely to contain or wrap uncooked meat, fish, or poultry;
  • A bag used solely to package loose items such as fruits, vegetables, nuts, coffee, grains, baked goods, candy, greeting cards, flowers, or small hardware items;
  • A bag used solely to contain live animals, such as fish or insects sold in a pet store;
  • A bag used solely to contain food sliced or prepared to order, including soup or hot food;
  • A laundry, dry cleaning, or garment bag; 
  • A bag provided by a pharmacy to carry prescription drugs;
  • A newspaper bag; and
  • Any similar bag, as determined by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). 

Polystyrene Foam Food Service Products

S-864 also bans disposable food containers and cups made out of polystyrene foam. Businesses will be prohibited from selling any polystyrene foam foodservice products, and foodservice businesses will be prohibited from providing or selling any food in a polystyrene foam foodservice product. The following products, however, will be exempt for an additional two years after May 2022:  

  • Disposable, long-handled polystyrene foam soda spoons when required and used for thick drinks;
  • Portion cups of two ounces or less, if used for hot foods or foods requiring lids;
  •  Meat and fish trays for raw or butchered meat, including poultry, or fish that is sold from a refrigerator or similar retail appliance;
  • Any food product pre-packaged by the manufacturer with a polystyrene foam foodservice product; and
  • Any other polystyrene foam foodservice product as determined necessary by Department of Environmental Protection.

Additionally, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP) is authorized, upon written application by a person or foodservice business, to waive the prohibitions on polystyrene foam foodservice products for a period of up to one year if:  (1) there is no feasible and commercially available alternative for a specific polystyrene foam foodservice product; or (2) the person or foodservice business has less than $500,000 in gross annual income and there is no reasonably affordable, commercially-available alternative to the polystyrene foam foodservice product.

Plastic Straws

Starting November 2021, food service businesses will only be able to provide a single-use plastic straw to a customer upon the request of the customer.  A store, however, would be permitted to provide other types of straws, such as paper or reusable metal straws, without limitation.

Enforcement and Compliance

The DEP, a municipality, and any entity certified pursuant to the County Environmental Health Act are authorized to enforce S-864; with the exception that the DOH would enforce the provisions of the law concerning single-use plastic straws.  Any person or entity that violates the provisions of the new law will be subject to a warning for a first offense, a fine of up to $1,000 for a second offense, and a fine of up to $5,000 for a third or subsequent offense.  If the violation is of a continuing nature, each day during which it continues would constitute an additional, separate, and distinct offense.  The Department of State, in consultation with DEP, is required to establish a program to assist businesses in complying with the provisions of S-864, including, but not limited to, developing and publishing compliance guidance on its website guidance and establishing an online clearinghouse of vendors who provide environmentally sound alternatives to single-use plastic carryout bags, single-use paper carryout bags, polystyrene foam foodservice products, and single-use plastic straws.

If you have questions, please contact us

If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Dan McKillop, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC, LLC

Related Posts

See all
Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable? post image

Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "Rule 26 Expert Discovery: When an Expert Witness Uses AI, Is It Discoverable?"
How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery post image

How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]

Author: Chris Seelinger

Link to post with title - "How Expert Witness AI Use Ends Up in Discovery"
The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore post image

The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "The Screenshot Problem: Why Nothing Is Really Private Anymore"
BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers post image

BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]

Author: Nicholas Wall

Link to post with title - "BESS Project Agreements: Allocating Risk Among Developers, EPC Contractors, and Equipment Suppliers"
IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected? post image

IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]

Author: Michael Mietlicki

Link to post with title - "IP Infringement: What Steps Can You Take If You're Affected?"
Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next post image

Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]

Author: Sean M. Pena

Link to post with title - "Public Allegations, Unfinished Investigation: What New Jersey Businesses Should Do Next"

No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!

Explore What Matters Most to You.

Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.

Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.

Let`s get in touch!

* The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form. By providing a telephone number and submitting this form you are consenting to be contacted by SMS text message. Message & data rates may apply. Message frequency may vary. You can reply STOP to opt-out of further messaging.
“If you would like to submit a file, please email it directly to info@sh-law.com.

Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!