On March 31, 2014, New York State enacted legislation that would begin to raise the New York estate tax exclusion over five years to eventually equal the federal figure.
The table set out below shows the increases and the effective dates of such increases. Most readers will agree that everything has a price and, as one would expect, the revenue lost from the estate tax would be made up from another source.
Photo courtesy of Dorian Mongel (Unsplash.com)
NY Estate Tax Exclusion Increases
For decedents on or after
And before
The exclusion amount will be
April 1, 2014
April 1, 2015
$2,062,500
April 1, 2015
April 1, 2016
$3,125,000
April 1, 2016
April 1, 2017
$4,187,500
April 1, 2017
Jan 1, 2019
$5,250,000
April 1, 2019
Scheduled to equal the federal estate tax exemption
The New York State legislation has two additional provisions that are worthy of attention.
Three Year Look Back – New York added a provision that would pull gifts made between April 1, 2014 and 2019 back into the estate tax calculation. The State felt this was necessary to protect the tax base. The logic is sound as taxpayers could make that would not be part of the tax base and gain the benefit of the increased exclusion as well. An individual could make a taxable gross estate of $3,000,000 non-taxable for New York State purposes by simply giving away $1,000,000 today.
The Real Change – New York state expects to collect considerable income tax revenue by taxing certain trusts in a manner that is contrary to IRS federal treatment. Thus, New York will treat the trust as a grantor trust, in contrast to the federal system where the non-grantor trust is a separate taxpayer. Incomplete Non-Grantor Trusts (INGs) have been targeted and eliminated as a means of avoiding New York State income tax. Considering that the New York State income tax rate is currently 8.82% and the New York City rate is 3.876%, one understands why taxpayers establish INGs to avoid the state income tax. The acronym ING is sometimes preceded by a “D” for Delaware or an “N” for Nevada.
INGs provide a benefit when there is a large capital gain to be realized by an individual in a high tax state, such as New York or New Jersey. INGs are also used when intangible assets, such as stock or membership interests, are to be sold. In such a case, a New York resident forms the ING in another state prior to sale. Taxpayers rely on two things. First, the state of a taxpayer’s residence, such as New York, taxes trusts based on the trustee’s residence rather than that of the grantor or creator. It is easy to understand why Delaware and Nevada, states that do not tax non-resident beneficiaries, are popular places in which to establish INGs. Second, distributions of principal made in years after the sale will be non-taxable distributions.
For those persons active in the foreign tax area, they recognize a principal feature of drop-off trusts in the development of INGs. It will be an interesting spring for advisors to the address impact of the change in law of existing INGs and plan for the future.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
New York Estate Tax Law Changes Are Paid For By Taxing INGs?
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
On March 31, 2014, New York State enacted legislation that would begin to raise the New York estate tax exclusion over five years to eventually equal the federal figure.
The table set out below shows the increases and the effective dates of such increases. Most readers will agree that everything has a price and, as one would expect, the revenue lost from the estate tax would be made up from another source.
Photo courtesy of Dorian Mongel (Unsplash.com)
NY Estate Tax Exclusion Increases
For decedents on or after
And before
The exclusion amount will be
April 1, 2014
April 1, 2015
$2,062,500
April 1, 2015
April 1, 2016
$3,125,000
April 1, 2016
April 1, 2017
$4,187,500
April 1, 2017
Jan 1, 2019
$5,250,000
April 1, 2019
Scheduled to equal the federal estate tax exemption
The New York State legislation has two additional provisions that are worthy of attention.
Three Year Look Back – New York added a provision that would pull gifts made between April 1, 2014 and 2019 back into the estate tax calculation. The State felt this was necessary to protect the tax base. The logic is sound as taxpayers could make that would not be part of the tax base and gain the benefit of the increased exclusion as well. An individual could make a taxable gross estate of $3,000,000 non-taxable for New York State purposes by simply giving away $1,000,000 today.
The Real Change – New York state expects to collect considerable income tax revenue by taxing certain trusts in a manner that is contrary to IRS federal treatment. Thus, New York will treat the trust as a grantor trust, in contrast to the federal system where the non-grantor trust is a separate taxpayer. Incomplete Non-Grantor Trusts (INGs) have been targeted and eliminated as a means of avoiding New York State income tax. Considering that the New York State income tax rate is currently 8.82% and the New York City rate is 3.876%, one understands why taxpayers establish INGs to avoid the state income tax. The acronym ING is sometimes preceded by a “D” for Delaware or an “N” for Nevada.
INGs provide a benefit when there is a large capital gain to be realized by an individual in a high tax state, such as New York or New Jersey. INGs are also used when intangible assets, such as stock or membership interests, are to be sold. In such a case, a New York resident forms the ING in another state prior to sale. Taxpayers rely on two things. First, the state of a taxpayer’s residence, such as New York, taxes trusts based on the trustee’s residence rather than that of the grantor or creator. It is easy to understand why Delaware and Nevada, states that do not tax non-resident beneficiaries, are popular places in which to establish INGs. Second, distributions of principal made in years after the sale will be non-taxable distributions.
For those persons active in the foreign tax area, they recognize a principal feature of drop-off trusts in the development of INGs. It will be an interesting spring for advisors to the address impact of the change in law of existing INGs and plan for the future.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
