Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 14, 2020
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.com
With key COVID-19 relief programs scheduled to expire at the end of the year, the pressure is on Congress to reach a deal. While it’s still unclear what the next few weeks will bring, a recently announced bipartisan proposal for $908 billion in COVID-19 aid is a good sign.
Several COVID-19 relief programs are scheduled to expire at the end of the month. They include Pandemic Unemployment Assistance Program (PUA) and Pandemic Emergency Unemployment Compensation (PEUC), which provide expanded benefits to unemployed workers. Moratoriums on evictions and foreclosures are also ending on December 31, 2020.
COVID-19 relief for borrowers with federal student loans also terminates at the end of the month. The relief paused federal student loan payments and collections through the end of the year and imposed a temporary 0% interest rate on federally-owned student loans. Additionally, previous COVID-19 relief bills relaxed several requirements for retirement accounts. Those impacted by the pandemic could withdraw up to $100,000 from a 401(k) or individual retirement account until without facing the 10% penalty. Retirees age 72 and older were also able to forgo their 2020 required minimum distributions.
On December 1, 2020, a group of Republican and Democratic Senators announced a bipartisan, bicameral COVID-19 emergency relief framework. The lawmakers working on the proposed COVID-19 relief package includes Rep. Tom Reed of New York and Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Bill Cassidy of Louisiana and Lisa Murkowski of Alaska; as well as Democrats: Rep. Josh Gottheimer of New Jersey and Sens. Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan, both of New Hampshire, and Mark Warner of Virginia; and one independent, Sen. Angus King of Maine.
A breakdown of the COVID-19 emergency relief framework can be found here. Of particular interest to the business community, the plan includes $288 billion in aid for small businesses, including additional Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) and Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) funding. The business relief would also include subsidies for airlines, airports, transit, and other transportation industries, as well as targeted relief for the restaurant industry.
The COVID-19 proposal also includes a liability shield for businesses and other organizations that would protect them from COVID-19 related suits on a “short-term” basis. COVID-10 liability protection has been a top priority for Republicans, and this is the first time that Democrats have expressed any willingness to include it in a relief plan.
Right now, the bi-partisan group has only released a framework, with the full text of the legislation expected within the next week. Until then, we won’t know how the $908 billion will be specifically allocated and how the proposed legal protections for businesses would work.
While the introduction of a bipartisan proposal is certainly good news given the months-long standoff between the two parties, any COVID-19 relief legislation will need support from leadership on both sides of the aisle to get across the finish line. So far, only the Senate’s top Democrats have endorsed the plan. Of course, President Donald Trump must also sign the final bill.
The likelihood of compromise is lessened by the fact that control of the Senate is still up for grabs. While the Democrats hold the presidency and the House, Senate control will not be determined until two run-off elections are completed in Georgia.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Edward “Teddy” Eynon, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-896-4100.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) remain a critical tool for protecting sensitive business information. However, New York NDA requirements have evolved, and businesses must ensure these agreements are carefully drafted to remain enforceable. In a competitive market like New York City, NDAs are commonly used to protect proprietary information, client relationships, and strategic plans. At the same […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How Courts Evaluate Testamentary Capacity and Undue Influence Will contests in New Jersey are difficult to win, given the strong presumption that a properly executed will reflects the testator’s intent. However, challenges based on lack of testamentary capacity and undue influence remain common, particularly where there are concerns about mental capacity or the involvement of […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Bringing on outside investors can provide the capital and strategic support a business needs to grow. However, raising capital also introduces important legal, financial, and operational considerations. Before bringing on investors, businesses should address key legal issues to reduce risk, streamline investor due diligence, and position the company for long-term success. Early preparation signals that […]
Author: Dan Brecher

How the Updated Law Shapes Retirement and Estate Planning The SECURE 2.0 Act of 2022 materially reshapes the required minimum distribution (RMD) landscape, extending tax deferral opportunities while accelerating distribution requirements for many beneficiaries. For high-net-worth individuals and families, these changes are not merely technical. They require a reassessment of retirement income strategies, beneficiary planning, […]
Author: Marc J. Comer

Small businesses considering buying commercial property in New Jersey must evaluate a range of legal, financial, and operational factors. While ownership can offer long-term value and control, it also introduces significant risks if not properly structured. This guide outlines key considerations to help New Jersey business owners make informed decisions, minimize legal exposure, and successfully […]
Author: Robert L. Baker, Jr.

On January 28, 2026, staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Divisions of Corporation Finance, Investment Management, and Trading and Markets issued a joint statement clarifying how existing federal securities laws apply to tokenized securities. The SEC’s “Statement on Tokenized Securities” does not establish new law, but it does provide greater clarity on the […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!