Both houses of the New Jersey Legislature have approved a new bill that would add pregnant women to the Law Against Discrimination’s (LAD) protected classes of workers.
Should Governor Christie sign the bill, New Jersey would join a growing number of states and municipalities seeking to augment existing federal and state laws that prevent pregnancy discrimination in the workplace. For example, amendments to the New York City Human Rights Law take effect on January 30, 2014, which require employers with four or more workers to provide “reasonable accommodation” for pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions.
Unlike the federal ADA and the New York State Human Rights Law, courts have held that there are no accommodations that are “unreasonable” under the broader NYCHRL if they do not cause undue hardship. Undue hardship is an affirmative defense that an employer is obligated to plead and prove. Thus, as a practical matter, whatever accommodations a pregnant employee now requests in New York City must be granted unless the employer is prepared to prove at great expense and risk that doing so would be an undue hardship.
Prohibits businesses from treating a woman affected by pregnancy, for employment-related purposes, in a manner less favorable than other persons not affected by pregnancy but similar in their ability or inability to work.
Requires employers to make available reasonable accommodation for pregnancy-related needs when requested by the employee with the advice of her physician.
Prohibits employers from penalizing workers in terms, conditions or privileges of employment for using the accommodations or, when accommodations are not feasible, for taking time away from work required by the pregnancy, as certified by a physician of the employee taking into account the condition of the employee and the job requirements.
As discussed in a prior Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law News Blog post, the legislation is partly a response to a 2005 New Jersey Supreme Court decision, in which a slim majority held that the LAD currently allows an employer to terminate a female worker for failing to return from a maternity leave in a timely manner, even though she endured a difficult pregnancy. By a vote of 4-3, the majority reasoned that failing to treat pregnancy differently from other medical conditions under a facially neutral leave policy is not discriminatory.
We will continue to track the status of this legislation and provide updates as they become available. We encourage New Jersey employers to check back regularly and contact experienced counsel regarding any potential compliance concerns.
If you have any questions about the proposed changes to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination or would like to discuss how the new employment law may affect your business, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
New Jersey Pregnancy Discrimination Bill Heads to Governor’s Desk
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Both houses of the New Jersey Legislature have approved a new bill that would add pregnant women to the Law Against Discrimination’s (LAD) protected classes of workers.
Should Governor Christie sign the bill, New Jersey would join a growing number of states and municipalities seeking to augment existing federal and state laws that prevent pregnancy discrimination in the workplace. For example, amendments to the New York City Human Rights Law take effect on January 30, 2014, which require employers with four or more workers to provide “reasonable accommodation” for pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions.
Unlike the federal ADA and the New York State Human Rights Law, courts have held that there are no accommodations that are “unreasonable” under the broader NYCHRL if they do not cause undue hardship. Undue hardship is an affirmative defense that an employer is obligated to plead and prove. Thus, as a practical matter, whatever accommodations a pregnant employee now requests in New York City must be granted unless the employer is prepared to prove at great expense and risk that doing so would be an undue hardship.
Prohibits businesses from treating a woman affected by pregnancy, for employment-related purposes, in a manner less favorable than other persons not affected by pregnancy but similar in their ability or inability to work.
Requires employers to make available reasonable accommodation for pregnancy-related needs when requested by the employee with the advice of her physician.
Prohibits employers from penalizing workers in terms, conditions or privileges of employment for using the accommodations or, when accommodations are not feasible, for taking time away from work required by the pregnancy, as certified by a physician of the employee taking into account the condition of the employee and the job requirements.
As discussed in a prior Scarinci Hollenbeck Business Law News Blog post, the legislation is partly a response to a 2005 New Jersey Supreme Court decision, in which a slim majority held that the LAD currently allows an employer to terminate a female worker for failing to return from a maternity leave in a timely manner, even though she endured a difficult pregnancy. By a vote of 4-3, the majority reasoned that failing to treat pregnancy differently from other medical conditions under a facially neutral leave policy is not discriminatory.
We will continue to track the status of this legislation and provide updates as they become available. We encourage New Jersey employers to check back regularly and contact experienced counsel regarding any potential compliance concerns.
If you have any questions about the proposed changes to the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination or would like to discuss how the new employment law may affect your business, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
