
Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: December 14, 2016
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comNasty Gal, a homegrown fashion outfitter based in Los Angeles, has an interesting story. Its founder, Sophia Amoruso, started the company in 2006 with nothing more than a laptop, an eBay account and her passion for developing vintage clothing. The business prides itself on designing and producing its own clothes, shoes and accessories on the West Coast.
Despite former CEO Sophia Amoruso’s passionate fan base, the Nasty Gal fashion company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, according to Re/code. The company made the move in preparation for a restructuring of its debts.
Re/code noted that Amoruso had stepped down as executive chairwoman, and Director Danny Rimer had also resigned from his board position. Four years ago, Nasty Gal was in a better position. In 2012, Index Ventures invested $49 million into the business. Even last year, retail executive Ron Johnson provided $16 million in funding. So, what happened?
Recently, change has been the only certainty for Nasty Gal. Another story from Re/code noted that, in January 2015, Amoruso resigned as chief executive officer, handing the title to Sheree Waterson, who had been the fashion company’s president beforehand. Amoruso, then only 30 years old, indicated she believed Nasty Gal needed someone at the helm who had experience managing and driving operations.
Yet, at the beginning of 2016, Nasty Gal laid off 10 percent of its workforce, according to Racked. Waterson noted the decision would “allow [Nasty Gal] to continue to evolve as a company.”
TechCrunch noted Nasty Gal filed for bankruptcy to resolve its liquidity issues, correct structural problems and achieve compliance with its debt agreements.
“We expect to maintain our high level of customer service and emerge stronger and even better able to deliver the product and experience that our customers expect and that we take pride in bringing to the market,” said the company in a statement, as quoted by TechCrunch.
The bankruptcy comes in the wake of much legal wrangling over the past couple of years. According to The Fashion Law, the company was facing four lawsuits regarding its termination practices. Allegedly, Nasty Gal had fired three staff members either because of their gender or because of pregnancies. In another case, former Nasty Gal employee Farah Saberi filed a lawsuit claiming Amoruso fired her after she received a heart transplant. Upon returning to work, Saberi alleged that Nasty Gal reduced her salary, demoted her to a lower position and eventually fired her.
Saberi’s lawsuit cites violations of the Fair Employment Housing Act, Wrongful Termination and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The former Nasty Gal employee aims to receive $3 million in compensation for her grievances.
With respect to the bankruptcy, it will be interesting to see what Nasty Gal will look like after the restructuring.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
For more articles regarding retail companies filing for bankruptcy, check out:
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Nasty Gal, a homegrown fashion outfitter based in Los Angeles, has an interesting story. Its founder, Sophia Amoruso, started the company in 2006 with nothing more than a laptop, an eBay account and her passion for developing vintage clothing. The business prides itself on designing and producing its own clothes, shoes and accessories on the West Coast.
Despite former CEO Sophia Amoruso’s passionate fan base, the Nasty Gal fashion company filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, according to Re/code. The company made the move in preparation for a restructuring of its debts.
Re/code noted that Amoruso had stepped down as executive chairwoman, and Director Danny Rimer had also resigned from his board position. Four years ago, Nasty Gal was in a better position. In 2012, Index Ventures invested $49 million into the business. Even last year, retail executive Ron Johnson provided $16 million in funding. So, what happened?
Recently, change has been the only certainty for Nasty Gal. Another story from Re/code noted that, in January 2015, Amoruso resigned as chief executive officer, handing the title to Sheree Waterson, who had been the fashion company’s president beforehand. Amoruso, then only 30 years old, indicated she believed Nasty Gal needed someone at the helm who had experience managing and driving operations.
Yet, at the beginning of 2016, Nasty Gal laid off 10 percent of its workforce, according to Racked. Waterson noted the decision would “allow [Nasty Gal] to continue to evolve as a company.”
TechCrunch noted Nasty Gal filed for bankruptcy to resolve its liquidity issues, correct structural problems and achieve compliance with its debt agreements.
“We expect to maintain our high level of customer service and emerge stronger and even better able to deliver the product and experience that our customers expect and that we take pride in bringing to the market,” said the company in a statement, as quoted by TechCrunch.
The bankruptcy comes in the wake of much legal wrangling over the past couple of years. According to The Fashion Law, the company was facing four lawsuits regarding its termination practices. Allegedly, Nasty Gal had fired three staff members either because of their gender or because of pregnancies. In another case, former Nasty Gal employee Farah Saberi filed a lawsuit claiming Amoruso fired her after she received a heart transplant. Upon returning to work, Saberi alleged that Nasty Gal reduced her salary, demoted her to a lower position and eventually fired her.
Saberi’s lawsuit cites violations of the Fair Employment Housing Act, Wrongful Termination and the Americans with Disabilities Act. The former Nasty Gal employee aims to receive $3 million in compensation for her grievances.
With respect to the bankruptcy, it will be interesting to see what Nasty Gal will look like after the restructuring.
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
For more articles regarding retail companies filing for bankruptcy, check out:
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!