
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.com
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comThe distinction between a material and non-material contract breach impacts the legal recourse available to a Monmouth County business. After a material breach, the aggrieved party does not need to perform its part of the contract.

In some cases, a material breach will be obvious. For instance, if a band is hired to perform at an event on a specific date and fails to show up without a valid excuse, the breach is likely material.
In other situations, the distinction is far less clear, and the parties should consult with a Monmouth County business lawyer to determine the type of breach and the available remedies. There are several factors to consider when determining whether a contract breach is material, including:
| How far along are the parties in completing their obligations under the contract? A court is more likely to find a non-material breach in the later stages of an agreement. |
| How extensive is the failure?The court will evaluate the losses suffered by the non-breaching party to determine if they impact the heart of the bargain. If so, it will generally find a material breach. |
| What was the intent of the parties? If the court finds that the breaching party acted unfairly or in bad faith, it is more likely to characterize the breach as material. |
| How easy is it to rectify the breach? If the problem could be remedied using reasonable effort and expense, the court is more likely to find a minor breach. |
| How will the breaching party be impacted if the other party is not obligated to perform? Even though the breaching party may be responsible for the problem, the court will still evaluate the severity of the impact (e.g., forfeiture) if the non-breaching party’s performance is excused. |
| Does the contract address breaches?In some case, the terms of the contract specify what constitutes a material breach. The court will look to those provisions to make its determination. |
The type of breach will impact the legal remedies available to the non-breaching party. If the breach is material, the aggrieved party can:
| File a lawsuit to recover damages and continue the contract, or |
| File a lawsuit to recover damages and cancel its performance under the contract |
If the contract breach is minor, the non-breaching party may only sue to recover damages.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!