Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: January 14, 2015
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comThe IRS is suing a number of former and current executives of Microsoft in a bid to force them to testify in an investigation into the company’s corporate tax practices.
According to The Seattle Times, at issue is whether the company is following corporate tax law in its practices of transferring the rights to its software to various subsidiaries in countries and territories of the U.S. with low taxes. This practice is commonly used by multinational corporations with valuable intellectual properties, and reportedly had “billions of dollars of impact” on Microsoft’s taxable income between 2004 and 2006, according to the lawsuit being brought by the IRS.
Companies that have subsidiaries in countries around the world are supposed to operate as though those subsidiaries were an “arm’s length” away for tax purposes. This means negotiating and dealing fairly with each other instead of setting prices that are favorable to the company come tax time. Frequently, this is not what happen.
Picture a large, multinational company with Subsidiary A in a country or locale with low taxes but a small market for its intellectual goods. Subsidiary B is in a country with higher taxes but a much larger market. Subsidiary B makes $1 billion in profits, but to reduce the overall tax burden, the company shifts the rights to the intellectual goods to Subsidiary A and sets the “price” for Subsidiary B to sell those goods at $1 billion. The result is that Subsidiary B makes no profits on paper, meaning that it has to pay virtually nothing in corporate tax. Subsidiary A has $1 billion in profits and pays the lower taxes on those profits that are mandated by its location.
The Internal Revenue Service appears to believe that this is what is happening in the case of Microsoft, and is attempting to get to the bottom of the issue.
According to GeekWire, the IRS issued a summons to longtime CEO Steve Ballmer at his home in Seattle demanding that he testify on Dec. 8, but he failed to appear. Microsoft had already told the IRS by this point that it was declining to make Ballmer and other former executives available because of a disagreement with the IRS over interview procedures. The IRS is also seeking to interview former chief Jim Allchin, former executive Bill Veghte, former Office division leader Jeff Raikes, former research and strategy chief Craig Mundie, former VP of Microsoft’s Worldwide Partner Group Jon Roskill and former marketing chief Mich Matthews, among others.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Corporate transactions can have significant implications for a corporation and its stakeholders. For deals to be successful, companies must act strategically to maximize value and minimize risk. It is also important to fully understand the legal and financial ramifications of corporate transactions, both in the near and long term. Understanding Corporate Transactions The term “corporate […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Ongoing economic uncertainty is forcing many companies to make tough decisions, which includes lowering staff levels. The legal landscape on both the state and federal level also continues to evolve, especially with significant changes to the priorities of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) under the Trump Administration. Terminating an employee is one of the […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
While filing annual reports may seem like a nuisance, failing to do so can have significant ramifications. These include fines, reputational harm, and interruption of your business operations. In basic terms, “admin dissolution for annual report” means that a company is dissolved by the government. This happens because it failed to submit its annual report […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Antitrust laws are designed to ensure that businesses compete fairly. There are three federal antitrust laws that businesses must navigate. These include the Sherman Act, the Federal Trade Commission Act, and the Clayton Act. States also have their own antitrust regimes. These may vary from federal regulations. Understanding antitrust litigation helps businesses navigate these complex […]
Author: Robert E. Levy
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!