Microsoft is being audited by the IRS and they demand leaders testify
The IRS is suing a number of former and current executives of Microsoft in a bid to force them to testify in an investigation into the company’s corporate tax practices.
According to The Seattle Times, at issue is whether the company is following corporate tax law in its practices of transferring the rights to its software to various subsidiaries in countries and territories of the U.S. with low taxes. This practice is commonly used by multinational corporations with valuable intellectual properties, and reportedly had “billions of dollars of impact” on Microsoft’s taxable income between 2004 and 2006, according to the lawsuit being brought by the IRS.
How it works
Companies that have subsidiaries in countries around the world are supposed to operate as though those subsidiaries were an “arm’s length” away for tax purposes. This means negotiating and dealing fairly with each other instead of setting prices that are favorable to the company come tax time. Frequently, this is not what happen.
Picture a large, multinational company with Subsidiary A in a country or locale with low taxes but a small market for its intellectual goods. Subsidiary B is in a country with higher taxes but a much larger market. Subsidiary B makes $1 billion in profits, but to reduce the overall tax burden, the company shifts the rights to the intellectual goods to Subsidiary A and sets the “price” for Subsidiary B to sell those goods at $1 billion. The result is that Subsidiary B makes no profits on paper, meaning that it has to pay virtually nothing in corporate tax. Subsidiary A has $1 billion in profits and pays the lower taxes on those profits that are mandated by its location.
The Internal Revenue Service appears to believe that this is what is happening in the case of Microsoft, and is attempting to get to the bottom of the issue.
According to GeekWire, the IRS issued a summons to longtime CEO Steve Ballmer at his home in Seattle demanding that he testify on Dec. 8, but he failed to appear. Microsoft had already told the IRS by this point that it was declining to make Ballmer and other former executives available because of a disagreement with the IRS over interview procedures. The IRS is also seeking to interview former chief Jim Allchin, former executive Bill Veghte, former Office division leader Jeff Raikes, former research and strategy chief Craig Mundie, former VP of Microsoft’s Worldwide Partner Group Jon Roskill and former marketing chief Mich Matthews, among others.
Crypto Enforcement: A Former Prosecutor’s Warning to Criminals and the Public
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Understanding Chattel Paper: A Key Component in Secured Transactions
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Supreme Court and Title VII: Implications for Reverse Discrimination
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Short Form Merger: Streamlining the Process for Businesses
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
