If you’ve been keeping up with the latest sports law, you’ve probably heard Texas A&M Defensive Coordinator John Chavis will face a jury of his peers regarding his alleged breach of contract with Louisiana State University.
The Advocate reported Baton Rouge District Judge Tim Kelley recently concluded a jury will decide whether Chavis or LSU breached the former’s contract. The judge’s decision is the latest development in a high-profile sports lawsuit that’s been going on since early 2015.
Background of the LSU and Chavis case
Chavis is, according to Saturday Down South, one of the most reputable DCs in the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s Southeastern Conference. He served as DC for the Tennessee Volunteers (1995-2008) and the LSU Tigers (2009-2014). Now, he’s a DC and linebackers coach for the Texas A&M Aggies. During his time at LSU, analysts consistently ranked the team’s defense in the top 10 across the nation.
What’s going on with the lawsuit? SB Nation provided a rundown of the case. On Jan. 5, 2015, Chavis submitted his 30-day notice to LSU in the wake of rumors speculating the DC was to leave the Baton Rouge-based school for a position at Texas A&M. According to CBS Sports, Chavis’ LSU contract expired on Dec. 31, 2015. However, Chavis maintained the contract contained the following conditions which allowed him to legally terminate the agreement before the end of last year:
Chavis could terminate the deal without cause provided he submitted an official 30-day notice.
If there were 11 months left on his contract or fewer, the DC could terminate the agreement without having to pay a penalty.
Here’s where things get a little messy. SB Nation noted that, on Jan. 15 of last year, a picture surfaced showing Chavis dawning Texas A&M gear while on an alleged recruiting visit with Kris Boyd, a corner back now playing for the University of Texas. The photo implies that Chavis was working for his current school before the 30-day notice period expired on Feb. 4. From LSU’s perspective, recruitment is a part of a coach’s job, and therefore, Chavis broke the contract’s agreement.
Lawsuits on both sides
KBTX.com reported that, before Chavis allegedly visited Boyd in an attempt to recruit him, LSU Director of Athletics Joe Alleva sent the DC a letter claiming the latter must pay the university $400,000. This was before Texas A&M officially hired Chavis. This prompted Chavis to file a suit claiming not only that he didn’t have to pay the penalty but also that Texas A&M was responsible for paying the fee if that was the case.
Last year, a Texas judge dismissed the lawsuit, asserting the case belonged in a Louisiana district, according to Alabama.com. One of the recent arguments against Chavis’ suit is that he did not break the contract because he did not sign an amended contract during his tenure at LSU. However, the DC’s old school is still pursuing the case.
Jill Craft, Chavis’ lead attorney, argued the $400,000 buyout Chavis owes the school is void because the school altered the contract in 2013. In her words, “[Chavis] didn’t breach it because he didn’t sign it.” However, Kelley maintained the lawsuit will go to jury in any case. As of the end of October, Kelley has not set a date for the jury trial.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association contracts are quite complex, requiring thorough analysis from experienced attorneys. If you’re in the midst of negotiating a contract with your university or have any questions regarding the matter, please contact me, Anthony Caruso, 201-806-3364.
A Whistleblower Just Filed a Complaint Against Your Company: Here's What to Do Now
Few situations create more uncertainty than learning that an employee has filed a whistleblower complaint. Questions arise immediately: Is the allegation legitimate? Should the employee be placed on leave? Do we need to notify our insurance carrier? Are we now prevented from disciplining the employee if there are unrelated ongoing work related issues? There is […]
Assignment for the Benefit of Creditors: An Alternative to Bankruptcy for Distressed Businesses
When a business reaches the point where it can no longer service its debts or otherwise resolve its liabilities, management is often faced with a difficult question: is a bankruptcy filing necessary or is there another way to perform an orderly liquidation or sale of the business assets? While Chapters 7 and 11 of the […]
Breaking Down New Jersey’s “Mansion” Tax: What Buyers and Sellers Need to Know
For many years, the New Jersey Mansion Tax has been a significant consideration in high-value real estate transactions. Recent legislative changes, however, have substantially altered how the tax operates, including who is responsible for paying it and the amount owed in certain transactions. Whether you are purchasing, selling, or investing in New Jersey real estate, […]
Estate Planning for Digital Assets Under New Jersey Law
As our personal and financial lives increasingly move online, estate planning must evolve to address a new category of property: digital assets. From email accounts and social media profiles to cryptocurrency and cloud-stored business records, these assets often carry both financial and sentimental value. Yet, without proper planning, they can become inaccessible—or even lost—upon incapacity […]
The Role of Representation and Warranty Insurance in M&A Transactions
In today’s mergers and acquisitions market, representation and warranty (R&W) insurance has become a common feature of deal negotiations. Once used primarily in larger transactions, R&W insurance is now frequently incorporated into middle-market deals as buyers and sellers look for efficient ways to allocate risk and close deals. When structured properly, R&W insurance can help […]
You Just Received a Federal Grand Jury Subpoena in New Jersey: Now What?
Receiving a federal grand jury subpoena is not something most businesses or individuals anticipate. While it can be concerning, a federal grand jury subpoena does not necessarily mean that you are being accused of wrongdoing. It does, however, mean that a federal criminal investigation is underway and that federal prosecutors believe you may possess information […]
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!
