Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Lose One, Settle One: SEC Needs to Choose Its Fights Carefully
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: November 1, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is publicly trying to rebuild its reputation as a tough enforcer. However, as the results of two recent cases demonstrate, you can’t win them all.
As we have previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, the SEC is moving away from its former policy of settling many cases on a neither-admit-nor-deny basis. Instead, the agency plans to take more cases to trial.
However, flamboyant businessman Mark Cuban recently took his chances at trial and won. The SEC accused the owner of the Dallas Mavericks of insider trading in connection with his sale of stock in search engine Momma.com, a claim Cuban vehemently denied. In the end, the jury cleared him of violating federal securities laws. They concluded that Cuban had not received material, non-public information or agreed not to trade on it.
The high-profile loss could be a setback for the SEC’s new enforcement regime and weaken its leverage at the negotiating table. However, the agency still has a good trial record, winning approximately 80 percent of its cases in recent years.
The SEC also still tends to resolve the majority of its cases outside the courtroom. Most recently, the agency reached a $200 million settlement with JPMorgan Chase & Co. The agency alleged that the firm misstated financial results and lacked effective internal controls to detect and prevent the now infamous “London Whale” trading losses.
In a significant victory for the SEC, the settlement also required JPMorgan to admit the facts underlying the SEC’s charges and publicly acknowledge that it violated the federal securities laws. The admission bolsters the agency’s new settlement policy and may encourage future wrongdoers to follow suit.
If you have any questions these cases or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Locations: New York City
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Lose One, Settle One: SEC Needs to Choose Its Fights Carefully
Author: Dan Brecher
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is publicly trying to rebuild its reputation as a tough enforcer. However, as the results of two recent cases demonstrate, you can’t win them all.
As we have previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, the SEC is moving away from its former policy of settling many cases on a neither-admit-nor-deny basis. Instead, the agency plans to take more cases to trial.
However, flamboyant businessman Mark Cuban recently took his chances at trial and won. The SEC accused the owner of the Dallas Mavericks of insider trading in connection with his sale of stock in search engine Momma.com, a claim Cuban vehemently denied. In the end, the jury cleared him of violating federal securities laws. They concluded that Cuban had not received material, non-public information or agreed not to trade on it.
The high-profile loss could be a setback for the SEC’s new enforcement regime and weaken its leverage at the negotiating table. However, the agency still has a good trial record, winning approximately 80 percent of its cases in recent years.
The SEC also still tends to resolve the majority of its cases outside the courtroom. Most recently, the agency reached a $200 million settlement with JPMorgan Chase & Co. The agency alleged that the firm misstated financial results and lacked effective internal controls to detect and prevent the now infamous “London Whale” trading losses.
In a significant victory for the SEC, the settlement also required JPMorgan to admit the facts underlying the SEC’s charges and publicly acknowledge that it violated the federal securities laws. The admission bolsters the agency’s new settlement policy and may encourage future wrongdoers to follow suit.
If you have any questions these cases or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.