Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Lose One, Settle One: SEC Needs to Choose Its Fights Carefully
Author: Dan Brecher
Date: November 1, 2013
Key Contacts
Back
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is publicly trying to rebuild its reputation as a tough enforcer. However, as the results of two recent cases demonstrate, you can’t win them all.
As we have previously discussed on this Business Law Blog, the SEC is moving away from its former policy of settling many cases on a neither-admit-nor-deny basis. Instead, the agency plans to take more cases to trial.
However, flamboyant businessman Mark Cuban recently took his chances at trial and won. The SEC accused the owner of the Dallas Mavericks of insider trading in connection with his sale of stock in search engine Momma.com, a claim Cuban vehemently denied. In the end, the jury cleared him of violating federal securities laws. They concluded that Cuban had not received material, non-public information or agreed not to trade on it.
The high-profile loss could be a setback for the SEC’s new enforcement regime and weaken its leverage at the negotiating table. However, the agency still has a good trial record, winning approximately 80 percent of its cases in recent years.
The SEC also still tends to resolve the majority of its cases outside the courtroom. Most recently, the agency reached a $200 million settlement with JPMorgan Chase & Co. The agency alleged that the firm misstated financial results and lacked effective internal controls to detect and prevent the now infamous “London Whale” trading losses.
In a significant victory for the SEC, the settlement also required JPMorgan to admit the facts underlying the SEC’s charges and publicly acknowledge that it violated the federal securities laws. The admission bolsters the agency’s new settlement policy and may encourage future wrongdoers to follow suit.
If you have any questions these cases or would like to discuss the legal issues involved, please contact me, Dan Brecher, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
- Practices: Corporate Transactions & Business, Financial Services & Regulatory Practice
- Locations: New York City, Red Bank, NJ, Little Falls, NJ
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
The Due Diligence Process for NY Condominiums and Cooperatives
While the New York City real estate market can be extremely competitive, moving too quickly often backfires. Before purchasing a condominium or cooperative in New York City, it is important to do you homework. Purchasing property in NYC can involve a dizzying number of legal issues. These include condo and co-op rules, rent restrictions, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Smart Contract Legal Issues: Drafting Agreements for Blockchain
Smart contracts feature a unique blend of legal agreement and technical code. This innovation has the potential to reshape how business is conducted. At the same time, smart contract legal issues around enforceability, jurisdiction, identity, and compliance are common. The legal framework for these self-executing agreements is still evolving. What Are Smart Contracts? Smart contracts, […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Are Stay Interviews the Key to Retaining Top Talent?
Retaining top talent continues to be one of the greatest challenges facing employers today. Even in an employer’s market, the loss of a key employee can disrupt operations and result in significant costs. While compensation plays a role, long-term retention often depends on workplace culture, communication, and employee engagement. One increasingly popular strategy for improving […]
Author: Angela A. Turiano
Why Secured Transactions Are Important
Secured transactions form the backbone of a wide range of business dealings, including business loans, mortgages, and inventory financing. Because the stakes are often high and relatively minor oversights can have drastic consequences, lenders and borrowers should thoroughly understand how to form an enforceable security agreement that protects their legal rights. What Is a Secured […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Don’t Cash a “Paid in Full” Check Without Understanding the Legal Implications
Cashing a check marked “paid in full” can be a risky endeavor, particularly if you don’t fully understanding the legal implications. If you are owed more than the amount of the check you accept and deposit, you may waive your right to collect the full disputed amount. That is why you should consider either rejecting […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Changes to Qualified Small Business Stock Will Benefit Startup Founders and Investors
The One Big Beautiful Bill Act of 2025 (OBBBA) significantly impacts federal taxes, credits, and deductions. A key change relating to Qualified Small Business Stock (QSBS) allows greater tax-free gains for investments in startups and other qualifying small businesses. Company founders and other investors should understand how the enhanced tax strategy works or risk missing […]
Author: Dan Brecher
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.