
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: October 22, 2019
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comThe litigation funding industry has grown rapidly over the past few years. For businesses considering taking legal action, relying on a third party to fund the suit in exchange for a cut of the proceeds can be an attractive option. However, it is important to understand how legal finance works and when it may benefit your company.
In most cases, litigation funding involves a commercial litigant obtaining capital from a third-party to pay for the costs associated with litigation or arbitration in exchange for a portion of the final award or settlement. While the terms of the agreement between the litigant and funder may vary, the capital provided by the funder is typically used to cover the fees and expenses associated with a case, such as attorney’s fees, filing fees, discovery costs, and expert witness fees. However, in some cases, the litigant may seek to use the funding for a totally unrelated business purpose.
The funder is a passive investor and plays no role in the litigation or arbitration, although the funder will closely monitor the progress of the case. In addition, the funder is generally only entitled to payment if the litigant obtains an award or judgment in its favor. If the litigant is unsuccessful, the funder loses its investment and has no legal recourse against the funded party.
Litigation funding can be used for a wide range of business litigation cases, including breach of contract, unfair competition, intellectual property infringement, and securities fraud. Businesses can also obtain funding at various stages of a lawsuit, from prior to filing suit to recovery.
Funders are more interested in entering a finance agreement in cases involving a significant degree of upfront costs, but a high likelihood of monetary recovery in the end. Given that securing payment upon the conclusion of litigation/arbitration can often be the most challenging part of the case, funders often want to make sure that the other party to the litigation has sufficient assets.
In addition to looking for meritorious claims, funders also want to see that litigants have documents and other evidence to readily back them up. Conversely, they may be reluctant to invest in cases that rely too heavily on witness testimony or involve novel legal issues because they can be unpredictable.
Litigation funding can benefit businesses ranging from start-ups to Fortune 500 companies. For smaller companies, legal finance can allow a business to pursue a claim that it may not otherwise have been able to afford. For larger ones, litigation finance can be part of a larger risk-management strategy.
Lawsuits are expensive and can significantly impact any company’s bottom line. According to Burford Capital’s 2018 Litigation Finance Survey, 68 percent of in-house counsel reported that their company had chosen to forgo valid claims due to the impact that the related legal expenses would have on their company’s finances. For companies considering litigation funding, the ability to move the costs associated with litigation off their balance sheet is particularly attractive. Litigation funding also leaves businesses free to use their capital to address more pressing needs.
Funders will always conduct due diligence to determine whether to invest in a claim. This “second set of eyes” can be valuable to a business that is not yet convinced that the claim is worth pursuing. Funders will also track the status of their investment throughout the course of the case, which can also result in valuable feedback.
Litigation funding can be a useful tool for businesses contemplating costly commercial litigation. However, it is important to recognize that entering into a finance agreement is a complex legal endeavor in and of itself. Businesses should ensure that they fully understand their rights and obligations prior to entering into a funding agreement.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Robert E. Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!