
Robert E. Levy
Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Robert E. Levy
Date: October 22, 2019

Partner
201-896-7163 rlevy@sh-law.comThe litigation funding industry has grown rapidly over the past few years. For businesses considering taking legal action, relying on a third party to fund the suit in exchange for a cut of the proceeds can be an attractive option. However, it is important to understand how legal finance works and when it may benefit your company.

In most cases, litigation funding involves a commercial litigant obtaining capital from a third-party to pay for the costs associated with litigation or arbitration in exchange for a portion of the final award or settlement. While the terms of the agreement between the litigant and funder may vary, the capital provided by the funder is typically used to cover the fees and expenses associated with a case, such as attorney’s fees, filing fees, discovery costs, and expert witness fees. However, in some cases, the litigant may seek to use the funding for a totally unrelated business purpose.
The funder is a passive investor and plays no role in the litigation or arbitration, although the funder will closely monitor the progress of the case. In addition, the funder is generally only entitled to payment if the litigant obtains an award or judgment in its favor. If the litigant is unsuccessful, the funder loses its investment and has no legal recourse against the funded party.
Litigation funding can be used for a wide range of business litigation cases, including breach of contract, unfair competition, intellectual property infringement, and securities fraud. Businesses can also obtain funding at various stages of a lawsuit, from prior to filing suit to recovery.
Funders are more interested in entering a finance agreement in cases involving a significant degree of upfront costs, but a high likelihood of monetary recovery in the end. Given that securing payment upon the conclusion of litigation/arbitration can often be the most challenging part of the case, funders often want to make sure that the other party to the litigation has sufficient assets.
In addition to looking for meritorious claims, funders also want to see that litigants have documents and other evidence to readily back them up. Conversely, they may be reluctant to invest in cases that rely too heavily on witness testimony or involve novel legal issues because they can be unpredictable.
Litigation funding can benefit businesses ranging from start-ups to Fortune 500 companies. For smaller companies, legal finance can allow a business to pursue a claim that it may not otherwise have been able to afford. For larger ones, litigation finance can be part of a larger risk-management strategy.
Lawsuits are expensive and can significantly impact any company’s bottom line. According to Burford Capital’s 2018 Litigation Finance Survey, 68 percent of in-house counsel reported that their company had chosen to forgo valid claims due to the impact that the related legal expenses would have on their company’s finances. For companies considering litigation funding, the ability to move the costs associated with litigation off their balance sheet is particularly attractive. Litigation funding also leaves businesses free to use their capital to address more pressing needs.
Funders will always conduct due diligence to determine whether to invest in a claim. This “second set of eyes” can be valuable to a business that is not yet convinced that the claim is worth pursuing. Funders will also track the status of their investment throughout the course of the case, which can also result in valuable feedback.
Litigation funding can be a useful tool for businesses contemplating costly commercial litigation. However, it is important to recognize that entering into a finance agreement is a complex legal endeavor in and of itself. Businesses should ensure that they fully understand their rights and obligations prior to entering into a funding agreement.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Robert E. Levy, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!