Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 5, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comOn the heels of newly passed state-wide regulations, New York City recently enacted the Stop Sexual Harassment in NYC Act (Act), which imposes additional requirements on top of the New York State laws. Most notably, employers must conduct annual sexual harassment training and display an anti-sexual harassment poster in common areas of the workplace.
The Act mandates that all private employers with 15 or more employees conduct annual anti-sexual harassment training for all employees, including supervisors and managerial employees. The sexual harassment training is also required within 90 days of initial hire for employees who work more than 80 hours in a calendar year on either a full-time or part-time basis. For new employees who received anti-sexual harassment training at a previous employer within the required training cycle, additional anti-sexual harassment training at the new employer would not be required until the next cycle. In addition, employers that are subject to sexual harassment training requirements in multiple jurisdictions may prove compliance with the Act by submitting proof that it provides all workers with annual interactive anti-sexual harassment training that satisfies the training standards set forth in the Act.
Under the Act, the annual sexual harassment training must include, but need not be limited to, the following:
Under the Act, the term “interactive training” means participatory teaching whereby the trainee is engaged in a trainer-trainee interaction, use of audio-visuals, computer or online training program or other participatory forms of training as determined by the commission. However, such “interactive training” is not required to be live or facilitated by an in-person instructor. The New York City Commission on Human Rights, in order to help New York City employers comply with the new training requirement, is tasked with creating an online interactive training module, which will be posted on its website for access by employers.
Employers must keep records of the training completed by each employee for at least three years, including a signed employee acknowledgment. The new requirement takes effect on April 1, 2019.
The Stop Sexual Harassment in NYC Act directs the New York City Commission on Human Rights to design an anti-sexual harassment rights and responsibilities poster and post it online for employers to access. All NYC employers will be required to display such poster in a conspicuous location where employees gather, such as break rooms and common areas. Every employer at a minimum must display the poster in English and in Spanish.
The Act also mandates distribution of an information sheet on sexual harassment to employees at the time of hire. The sheet will also be created by the New York City Commission on Human Rights. This part of the Act takes effect 120 days after May 9, 2018, the date that it was signed by Mayor de Blasio, provided that the Commission takes all actions needed for its implementation.
The Act also amends the New York City Human Rights Law, with regard specifically to sexual harassment, to apply to all employers, regardless of the number of employees. In addition, it extended the statute of limitations for filing gender-based harassment claims under the city human rights law from one year to three years. These amendments took place immediately.
For New York City employers, tasking affirmative steps to achieve anti-sexual harassment compliance, should be a top priority. With new state and local regulations, the compliance burdens and liability risks are growing. To stay on top of all your obligations, we encourage you to contact one of Scarinci Hollenbeck’s experienced employment attorneys.
Do you have any questions? Would you like to discuss the matter further? If so, please contact me, Gary Young, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
If you’re considering closing your business, it’s crucial to understand that simply shutting your doors does not end your legal obligations. Unless you formally dissolve your business, it continues to exist in the eyes of the law—leaving you exposed to ongoing liabilities such as taxes, compliance violations, and potential lawsuits. Dissolving a business can seem […]
Author: Christopher D. Warren
Contrary to what many people think, corporate restructuring isn’t all doom and gloom. Revamping a company’s organizational structure, corporate hierarchy, or operations procedures can help keep your business competitive. This is particularly true during challenging times. Corporate restructuring plays a critical role in modern business strategy. It helps companies adapt quickly to market changes. Following […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Cryptocurrency intimidates most people. The reason is straightforward. People fear what they do not understand. When confusion sets in, the common reaction is either to ignore the subject entirely or to mistrust it. For years, that is exactly how most of the public and even many in law enforcement treated cryptocurrency. However, such apprehension changed […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!