Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: September 4, 2019
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comIt is now easier to prove discriminatory harassment in New York. On August 12, 2019, the state enacted sweeping amendments to the New York State Human Rights Law (NYSHRL), including a provision specifying that harassment need not be “severe or pervasive” in order to be legally actionable.

Under Gov. Andrew Cuomo, New York has significantly strengthened its protections against workplace sexual harassment. In 2018, the state incorporated several new legal requirements into the budget, including provisions that prohibit certain mandatory arbitration clauses and nondisclosure agreements; require reimbursement of funds paid by state agencies, state entities and public entities for the payment of awards adjudicated in sexual harassment claims; expand the legal protection for non-employees; and establish a model policy and training program regarding the prevention of sexual harassment in the workplace.
The latest legislation, Assembly Bill No. A8421, makes additional changes to the NYSHRL and expands many of the protections to all forms of harassment against protected classes. In addition, it lowers the bar for individuals pursuing harassment claims. Under the amended NYSHRL, a claimant need only prove that he or she has been subjected to “inferior terms, conditions or privileges of employment because of the individual’s membership in one or more of [the] protected categories,” regardless of whether such harassment would be considered severe or pervasive under existing court precedent applied to harassment claims.
“By ending the absurd legal standard that sexual harassment in the workplace needs to be ‘severe or pervasive’ and making it easier for workplace sexual harassment claims to be brought forward, we are sending a strong message that time is up on sexual harassment in the workplace and setting the standard of equity for women,” Gov. Cuomo said in a statement.
Employers may raise the affirmative defense that the “harassing conduct does not rise above the level of what a reasonable victim of discrimination with the same protected characteristic would consider petty slights or trivial inconveniences.” However, the Faragher-Ellerth defense is no longer available. The long-standing defense provides that when no tangible employment action is taken, the employer may avail itself of an affirmative defense, provided that the employer exercised reasonable care to prevent and correct promptly any sexually harassing behavior, and that the employee unreasonably failed to take advantage of any preventive or corrective opportunities provided by the employer.
Below is a brief summary of several other key changes to the NYSHRL:
The new law will take effect in three phases. Effective immediately, employers must provide model sexual harassment policies and training materials in English and employee’s primary language. The elimination of the “severe and pervasive” standard takes effect in 60 days. Other provisions, such as extending the NYSHRL to all employers regardless of the number of employees, won’t take effect for 180 days.
Given the significance of the changes to New York law, employers should undertake a thorough review of their anti-harassment policies, procedures and training. Employment agreements, specifically those including mandatory arbitration and non-disclosure provisions, may also need to be amended to ensure compliance with the new requirements. For guidance, we recommend consulting with an experienced New York employment attorney.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Scott Heck, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Once a child turns 18, parents lose the automatic legal authority to make medical and financial decisions on their behalf, even if the child still lives at home or remains on the family’s insurance. Three documents close that gap: a durable power of attorney, a health care proxy or directive, and a HIPAA authorization. For […]
Author: George McGowan

Business mediation is a confidential, voluntary process in which a neutral third party helps companies negotiate a resolution to a commercial dispute without going to trial. Because working with a mediator is very different from litigating in the courtroom, it is important to understand how commercial mediation works, when it makes sense for your dispute, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The five most common causes of construction defect litigation are design defects, substandard materials, workmanship defects, code violations, and subsurface defects. Because these flaws can compromise a building’s integrity, functionality, or safety, they frequently lead to disputes involving multiple parties and high financial stakes. Key takeaways: What is Construction Defect Litigation? Construction litigation is complex, […]
Author: Paul Grossman

The most effective ways to protect your business in a divorce are put in place before one begins: a prenuptial or postnuptial agreement, clean separation of business and personal finances, and divorce contingencies built into your operating or buy-sell agreements. If divorce is already underway, the priorities shift to establishing how the business is classified […]
Author: Jay McDaniel

The most common franchise disputes involve breach of contract, franchise termination and non-renewal, intellectual property rights, territorial encroachment, royalty and fee payments, franchisor support obligations, and violations of state franchise laws such as the New Jersey Franchise Practices Act. Franchisors and franchisees can often resolve these conflicts by providing written notice detailing the dispute and […]
Author: Paul Grossman

New Jersey businesses must manage legal and reputational risk together because modern disputes play out on two fronts at once: the legal proceeding itself and the court of public opinion, where customers, employees, investors, and business partners often reach conclusions long before a judge or jury has had the opportunity to evaluate the facts. Success […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!