Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: June 2, 2017
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comCriminal background checks are a hot-button issue. In addition to state-level “ban the box” laws, the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) also governs prospective employee criminal background checks.

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC), which is tasked with enforcing the FCRA, recently published a blog post regarding employers’ obligation to obtain written authorization to conduct background checks. While not considered official guidance, the FTC’s post does provide useful information for New York and New Jersey employers. According to the FTC, the bottom-line is to keep it simple (stupid) or KISS.
The FCRA applies when employers obtain background check information from third-party consumer reporting agencies and the FCRA requires employers to notify job applicants and employees that the employer might use information in the consumer report for employment decisions. The FCRA also requires employers to obtain written authorization to obtain the consumer report.
Because the FTC has not provided an official form for employers to use or any other official guidance regarding the required disclosure, it is a frequent subject of litigation. While the agency’s latest blog post, which is entitled “ does not remove all ambiguity regarding employers’ obligations, it does offer useful information. According to the FTC, “It’s OK to put the required disclosure and your request for their authorization in one document.” Nonetheless, the agency warns: “Just be sure to use clear wording that the prospective employee will understand.”
The FTC notes that many employers get into hot water by “using complicated legal jargon or adding extra acknowledgments or waivers.” It provides the following examples of common missteps:
As highlighted by the FTC, adding additional language may not only confuse applicants but may also lead to liability under the FCRA. To determine whether your background check disclosures and authorizations pass muster, it is always advisable to work with an experienced attorney.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki

When facing public allegations of wrongdoing, companies should not let the speed of the public conversation dictate the speed of an investigation. An investigation designed to confirm a preferred narrative rather than establish the facts can create serious problems later, particularly if litigation, regulatory scrutiny, or employment claims follow. Key Takeaways When public allegations surface […]
Author: Sean M. Pena
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!