Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Date: December 12, 2018
The Firm
201-896-4100 info@sh-law.comUber Technologies, Inc. (Uber) agreed to pay a record $148 million to settle accusations that it intentionally concealed a 2016 data breach that exposed the personal information of 57 million riders and drivers. Uber reached

According to reports, in November 2016, hackers notified security officials at Uber that they had stolen user information, which included names, email addresses, mobile phone numbers, and drivers’ license information. After providing proof of the massive data breach, the hackers demanded Uber pay a ransom to delete the data and not disclose the breach. Uber ultimately paid the hackers $100,000 to conceal the breach.
In the spring of 2017, Uber’s Board of Directors retained a law firm to investigate Uber’s security team in the wake of unrelated litigation involving the alleged theft of trade secrets related to self-driving cars. The investigators subsequently discovered the breach and ransom payment. Uber didn’t provide notice of the breach until November 2017, a year after the breach. The company later fired the two executives that approved the ransom payment.
The massive data breach and untimely disclosure prompted investigations by the Office of the New York Attorney General, along with numerous other state attorneys general. The recent settlement is the result of a multi-state probe that includes all 50 states, and the District of Columbia. In addition to the multi-million-dollar fine, the settlement requires Uber to adopt model data breach notification and data security practices and a corporate integrity program for employees to report unethical behavior, and hire an independent third party to assess its data security practices.
“This record settlement should send a clear message: we have zero tolerance for those who skirt the law and leave consumer and employee information vulnerable to exploitation,” New York Attorney General Barbara Underwood said. “We’ll continue to fight to protect New Yorkers from weak data security and criminal hackers.”
Uber has publicly stated that it has already started the process of overhauling its cyber and data security practices. As with other high-profile data breaches, there are a few lessons that other companies can learn from Uber’s mistakes:
As the potential risk and liability associated with data breaches continue to grow, businesses must be proactive. Consulting with attorneys knowledgeable in cybersecurity risk analysis and mitigation can help businesses of all sizes navigate the process.
If you have any questions or if you would like to discuss the matter further, please contact me, Fernando M. Pinguelo, or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work, at 201-806-3364.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

As battery energy storage system (BESS) projects move from planning to construction, developers and property owners must address an issue that extends well beyond zoning approvals and interconnection agreements: what happens when something goes wrong? To avoid unforeseen liability, developers should address fire code compliance, emergency response planning, contractual risk allocation, and environmental liability before […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

Case law following the 2010 amendments to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26 offers guidance on how courts are likely to address whether an expert witness’s AI records are subject to discovery. Key Takeaways Rule 26 Expert Discovery After the 2010 Amendments This article addresses the question courts and lawyers have faced in recent cases: […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

“Show how 3M is 0% at fault.” The absurd tale of how a 350-page ChatGPT history for 3M’s expert witness was produced during a deposition is more likely than you think. It’s an inevitable trend, and an unsettled question for federal courts as experts make generative AI part of their workflow. Key Takeaways Expert Witness […]
Author: Chris Seelinger

Screenshots have changed the risks of electronic communications. The screenshot problem is that messages intended for one person or a small group can be copied, forwarded, preserved, and ultimately presented to opposing counsel, regulators, journalists, customers, or a jury. Businesses should recognize that a truly private digital conversation is increasingly unreliable and ensure their policies, […]
Author: Sean M. Pena

Developers, engineering, procurement, and construction (EPC) contractors, and equipment suppliers each play a critical role in completing a BESS project. However, when equipment costs rise, deliveries are delayed, or regulations change, determining who bears the financial consequences can become contentious. Well-drafted project agreements are essential to sound risk allocation. Key Takeaways This article is Part […]
Author: Nicholas Wall

IP infringement occurs when someone uses your intellectual property without your permission or beyond the scope of the permission you granted. Common examples of IP infringement include copying a product’s patented features or using a trademarked logo in a way that is likely to confuse consumers about the source or affiliation of goods or services. […]
Author: Michael Mietlicki
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!