Joel R. Glucksman
Partner
201-896-7095 jglucksman@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Judges Rule On Nortel Networks Bankruptcy Case
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Date: June 17, 2015
Key Contacts
Back
Judges in the U.S. and Canada recently ruled on the bankruptcy proceedings of Nortel Networks, providing some clarity in a saga that has lasted since 2009 when the telecommunications giant filed for protection from creditors.
In that time, several courts have considered the fate of Nortel Networks assets, causing fees of more than $1 billion to pile up, according to Reuters.
The latest trial – which involved judges from both the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware and the Ontario Superior Court of Justice – resulted in a ruling that will see regional businesses receive pro rata portions of the $7.3 billion that came from the liquidation of Nortel Networks, the media outlet reported.
In separate opinions, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross and Canadian Justice Frank Newbould wrote that every regional business would receive a share of the $7.3 billion on the basis of its creditors’ claims relative to total claims across the world, according to the news source.
The judges opted for this ruling instead of approving any of the distribution schemes provided by the three competing Nortel groups that were representing creditors, Bloomberg reported. When the joint trial began in 2014, U.K. administrators for Nortel’s European units, the Canadian parent company and its U.S. unit all proposed different plans. However, the judges rejected all three proposals. In addition, they voiced their discontent because creditor groups could not agree to an allocation plan.
“The court can only speculate why the parties, all represented by the ablest of lawyers and sparing no expense, were unable to reach a settlement,” Judge Gross wrote in the opinion, according to the news source. He went on to say that the regional businesses “have lost sight of the irrationality of their respective positions.” Finally, he stated that the different parties involved left “virtually no middle ground.”
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.
- Practices: Bankruptcy & Creditors' Rights
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Related Posts
See all
Does Your Homeowners Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage?
Your home is likely your greatest asset, which is why it is so important to adequately protect it. Homeowners insurance protects you from the financial costs of unforeseen losses, such as theft, fire, and natural disasters, by helping you rebuild and replace possessions that were lost While the definition of “adequate” coverage depends upon a […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Understanding the Importance of a Non-Contingent Offer
Making a non-contingent offer can dramatically increase your chances of securing a real estate transaction, particularly in competitive markets like New York City. However, buyers should understand that waiving contingencies, including those related to financing, or appraisals, also comes with significant risks. Determining your best strategy requires careful analysis of the property, the market, and […]
Author: Jesse M. Dimitro
Fred D. Zemel Appointed Chair of Strategic Planning at Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC
Business Transactional Attorney Zemel to Spearhead Strategic Initiatives for Continued Growth and Innovation Little Falls, NJ – February 21, 2025 – Scarinci & Hollenbeck, LLC is pleased to announce that Partner Fred D. Zemel has been named Chair of the firm’s Strategic Planning Committee. In this role, Mr. Zemel will lead the committee in identifying, […]
Author: Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC
Novation Agreement Process: Step-by-Step Guide for Businesses
Big changes sometimes occur during the life cycle of a contract. Cancelling a contract outright can be bad for your reputation and your bottom line. Businesses need to know how to best address a change in circumstances, while also protecting their legal rights. One option is to transfer the “benefits and the burdens” of a […]
Author: Dan Brecher
What Is a Trade Secret? Key Elements and Legal Protections Explained
What is a trade secret and why you you protect them? Technology has made trade secret theft even easier and more prevalent. In fact, businesses lose billions of dollars every year due to trade secret theft committed by employees, competitors, and even foreign governments. But what is a trade secret? And how do you protect […]
Author: Ronald S. Bienstock
What Is Title Insurance? Safeguarding Against Title Defects
If you are considering the purchase of a property, you may wonder — what is title insurance, do I need it, and why do I need it? Even seasoned property owners may question if the added expense and extra paperwork is really necessary, especially considering that people and entities insured by title insurance make fewer […]
Author: Patrick T. Conlon
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Sign up to get the latest from our attorneys!
Explore What Matters Most to You.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Judges Rule On Nortel Networks Bankruptcy Case
Author: Joel R. Glucksman
Judges in the U.S. and Canada recently ruled on the bankruptcy proceedings of Nortel Networks, providing some clarity in a saga that has lasted since 2009 when the telecommunications giant filed for protection from creditors.
In that time, several courts have considered the fate of Nortel Networks assets, causing fees of more than $1 billion to pile up, according to Reuters.
The latest trial – which involved judges from both the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in Wilmington, Delaware and the Ontario Superior Court of Justice – resulted in a ruling that will see regional businesses receive pro rata portions of the $7.3 billion that came from the liquidation of Nortel Networks, the media outlet reported.
In separate opinions, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Gross and Canadian Justice Frank Newbould wrote that every regional business would receive a share of the $7.3 billion on the basis of its creditors’ claims relative to total claims across the world, according to the news source.
The judges opted for this ruling instead of approving any of the distribution schemes provided by the three competing Nortel groups that were representing creditors, Bloomberg reported. When the joint trial began in 2014, U.K. administrators for Nortel’s European units, the Canadian parent company and its U.S. unit all proposed different plans. However, the judges rejected all three proposals. In addition, they voiced their discontent because creditor groups could not agree to an allocation plan.
“The court can only speculate why the parties, all represented by the ablest of lawyers and sparing no expense, were unable to reach a settlement,” Judge Gross wrote in the opinion, according to the news source. He went on to say that the regional businesses “have lost sight of the irrationality of their respective positions.” Finally, he stated that the different parties involved left “virtually no middle ground.”
Are you a creditor in a bankruptcy? Have you been sued by a bankrupt? If you have any questions about your rights, please contact me, Joel Glucksman, at 201-806-3364.