
James F. McDonough
Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comFirm Insights
Author: James F. McDonough
Date: March 11, 2013

Of Counsel
732-568-8360 jmcdonough@sh-law.comThe U.S. has entered into agreements with several countries to help curb the incidence of tax law violations on the part of Americans. While many foreign banks have admitted to facilitating Americans in hiding income, the U.S. government may soon set its sights on two Israeli banks for complicity in tax evasion.
Zvi Sperling, an American, is facing charges from federal prosecutors for hiding taxable income in offshore accounts in Israel. During Sperling’s guilty plea, he noted that he had conspired with workers at Mizrahi Tefahot Bank – or Bank A, in the court documents – and Bank Leumi Le-Israel – or Bank B – to hide income from the IRS, according to Bloomberg. A representative at Leumi declined to comment on the specifics of the case, but no Israeli banks have yet been charged.
“The bank has a long-standing policy of not discussing customer relationships,” Orit Reuveni, a spokeswoman for Bank Leumi, told Bloomberg in an email. “We have previously stated that we are among the international banks within the scope of a U.S. inquiry into tax matters involving U.S. customers.”
Sperling, who co-owns a business with his brother, failed to disclose his offshore assets between 2003 and 2010, Bloomberg reports. According to court documents, he set up back-to-back loans between the banks and created an offshore account with the sole intent of hiding income and making it difficult for U.S. authorities to detect the income, Sperling said in his plea agreement. The news source notes that Sperling held roughly $4 million in his offshore account, the amount and interest earnings of which he never reported.
No charges have yet been brought against the two banks, but federal authorities have no ruled out a case.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.

High-profile founder litigation is more than just a media spectacle. For startup founders, these cases underscore the legal and structural risks that can arise when rapid growth outpaces formal oversight. While launching a new company can be both an exciting and deeply rewarding endeavor, founders must be mindful that it also comes with significant risks. […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Every New Jersey company should periodically evaluate its governance framework. Strong corporate governance protects directors and officers, builds investor confidence, reduces litigation exposure, and positions a company for sustainable growth. The first quarter of the year is a great time to evaluate your corporate governance practices and perform any routine maintenance needed to keep that […]
Author: Ken Hollenbeck

Being served with a lawsuit is one of the most stressful legal events a business or individual can face. Whether the claim involves a contract dispute, an employment matter, an intellectual property issue, or another legal challenge, the actions you take in the first few days can significantly shape the outcome of your case. Acting […]
Author: Robert E. Levy

Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (SPACs) continue to gain momentum as we move through 2026. After enduring a significant contraction following the 2021 boom and the regulatory scrutiny that followed, SPAC activity rebounded sharply in 2025 and now carries forward into 2026 with real momentum. The SPAC resurgence reflects broader improvements in both market conditions and the […]
Author: Dan Brecher

Compliance programs are no longer judged by how they look on paper, but by how they function in the real world. Compliance monitoring is the ongoing process of reviewing, testing, and evaluating whether policies, procedures, and controls are being followed—and whether they are actually working. What Is Compliance Monitoring? In today’s heightened regulatory environment, compliance […]
Author: Dan Brecher

New Jersey personal guaranty liability is a critical issue for business owners who regularly sign contracts on behalf of their companies. A recent New Jersey Supreme Court decision provides valuable guidance on when a business owner can be held personally responsible for a company’s debt. Under the Court’s decision in Extech Building Materials, Inc. v. […]
Author: Charles H. Friedrich
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!