
Dan Brecher
Counsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comCounsel
212-286-0747 dbrecher@sh-law.comThe number of craft breweries in the United States has skyrocketed in recent years. Most recently, the monks of St. Joseph Abbey, located in a small Massachusetts town, made headlines by introducing the first and only certified Trappist ale in the country. It sold out in a matter of days.
Here in New Jersey, laws took effect in 2012 that reduce the red tape for New Jersey breweries and help them compete with businesses in other states. Under the regulations, brewpubs can increase annual production from 3,000 barrels to 10,000. Microbreweries can also sell beer as part of a brewery tour as well as sell a limited amount for customers to take home.
While small brewers continue to open and thrive, the industry is also becoming big business. Under federal tax law, “small brewers’’ qualify for a reduced excise tax of $7 on beer sales. By comparison, brewers producing more than two million barrels pay an $18 tax on every barrel.
Given the potential tax breaks, larger breweries are also seeking to take advantage. By way of example, Boston Beer Co. is one of several beer manufacturers lobbying to expand the definition of “small brewer” to include those who produce six million barrels. The maker of Samuel Adams considers itself a “craft brewer” with its seasonal beers and limited edition releases. However, it generated more than $600 million in sales in 2012.
Nonetheless, the manufacturer was previously successful in lobbying the Brewers Association to change its definition of “craft” to include manufacturers who produce up to 6 million barrels annually, arguing that its operations pale in comparison to international giants like Anheuser-Busch InBev and MillerCoors. However, many argue that the tax benefits should be limited to those brewers that need the break to gain a foothold in the industry, rather than an established business.
Other beer companies have designed their operations to take advantage of the current law. Anheuser-Busch InBev owns several small breweries, including Blue Point. In addition, Jacob Leinenkugel Brewing Company, famous for its summer shandy, is owned by MillerCoors, although you will find no mention of the affiliation on the brewery’s website. Through the use of holding companies and the use of small sounding names on their websites, the large corporations are able to shield the true owner’s name.
Whether the practice is squeezing out the “little guy” is up for debate, but it may make you think twice about where your money is going next time you order a pint.
If you have any questions about this post or would like to discuss the regulations impacting the craft brewing industry, please contact me or the Scarinci Hollenbeck attorney with whom you work.
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Using chattel paper to obtain a security interest in personal property is a powerful tool. It can ensure lenders have a legal claim on collateral ranging from inventory to intellectual property. To reduce risk and protect your legal rights, businesses and lenders should understand the legal framework. This framework governs the creation, sale, and enforcement […]
Author: Dan Brecher
For years, digital assets operated in a legal gray area, a frontier where innovation outpaced the reach of regulators and law enforcement. In this early “Wild West” phase of finance, crypto startups thrived under minimal oversight. That era, however, is coming to an end. The importance of crypto compliance has become paramount as cryptocurrency has […]
Author: Bryce S. Robins
Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services vitiating the so-called “background circumstances” test required by half of federal circuit courts.1 The background circumstances test required majority group plaintiffs pleading discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act to meet a heightened pleading standard […]
Author: Matthew F. Mimnaugh
Special purpose acquisition companies (better known as SPACs) appear to be making a comeback. SPAC offerings for 2025 have already nearly surpassed last year’s totals, with additional transactions in the pipeline. SPACs last experienced a boom between 2020–2021, with approximately 600 U.S. companies raising a record $163 billion in 2021. Notable companies that went public […]
Author: Dan Brecher
Merging two companies is a complex legal and business transaction. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process that involves important corporate governance considerations. A short form merger, in which an acquiring company merges with a subsidiary corporation, offers a more streamlined process. However, […]
Author: Dan Brecher
The Trump Administration’s new tariffs are having an oversized impact on small businesses, which already tend to operate on razor thin margins. Many businesses have been forced to raise prices, find new suppliers, lay off staff, and delay growth plans. For businesses facing even more dire financial circumstances, there are additional tariff response options, including […]
Author: Brian D. Spector
No Aspect of the advertisement has been approved by the Supreme Court. Results may vary depending on your particular facts and legal circumstances.
Consider subscribing to our Firm Insights mailing list by clicking the button below so you can keep up to date with the firm`s latest articles covering various legal topics.
Stay informed and inspired with the latest updates, insights, and events from Scarinci Hollenbeck. Our resource library provides valuable content across a range of categories to keep you connected and ahead of the curve.
Let`s get in touch!
Sign up to get the latest from the Scarinci Hollenbeck, LLC attorneys!